INTRODUCTION
The presence of extended defects in the scalp presents itself as a major reconstructive
challenge for the plastic surgeon1,2. These defects have a wide etiology, such as traumatic, thermal or electrical burns,
benign and malignant or congenital tumor resections, sequelae of radiotherapy treatments
and infections. Deformities can range from small defects, which can be closed primarily,
to extensive defects, which require tissue expansion or even free flap transfer for
closure.
Scalping is trauma caused by partial or total avulsion of the scalp, resulting from
canine bites, accidents with industrial machinery and boat engines3,4.
The accident imposes physical sequelae and intense psychological and social suffering
throughout the treatment and throughout the patients’ lives, since it causes significant
damage to self-esteem, identity, body perception, mood, sociability, and global affective
relationships besides contributing to change the dynamics and family economy5.
The most serious injuries are caused by electrical burn5,6. The bone table is often impaired in these lesions, leading to necrosis of one or
both tables of the calvary7-10. The scalping caused by canine biting or some industrial machinery usually preserves
the external bone table, but in most cases, compromises the periosteum11. Extensive and complex defects involving exposed vital structures are not repairable
by local or regional techniques. In these difficult cases, free tissue transfer is
the best solution for coverage. Flap survival rates above 95% with low complication
rates have been described1.
This study aims to report a case of microsurgical reconstruction with a large dorsal
muscle-free flap due to total scalping per dog bite in a 69-year-old female patient.
CASE REPORT
Female, white, 69-year-old hypertensive patient, victim of scalping by a dog bite,
on 12/03/2018, in which the scalp tissue was totally devitalized with loss of tissue
anatomy. She was sent to Santa Casa de Limeira when the debridement of devitalized
tissues was performed under general anesthesia and later transferred to the hospital
of PUC-Campinas for plastic surgery evaluation and conduct.
On physical examination, the patient presented with an extensive scalp lesion with
an area of 550 cm² (frontal-occipital: 25 cm and biparietal: 22 cm), with exposure
of the skull cap with 50% of the periosteum area involved in the central parietal
region (Figure 1). On December 11, 2018, the right great dorsal musculocutaneous flap was transplanted
with end-to-end microvascular anastomosis between the right superficial temporal artery
and the thoracodorsal artery and, subsequently. Subsequently, the end-to-end microanastomosis
was performed between the right superficial temporal vein and the thoracodorsal vein
with the flap’s good tissue perfusion. Before vascular microanastomosis, both the
pedicle vessels and the recipient’s vessels were washed with 20 ml of 0.9% saline
solution (250 ml) with unfractionated heparin (2.5 ml). Both vascular anastomoses
were end-to-end type and made with simple stitches of 10.0 nylon thread (Ethicon W.2850).
The temporal vein offered greater technical difficulty, as it was shorter due to the
trauma. In the postoperative period, the patient used 20 mg subcutaneous clexane once
daily for three days and 200 mg acetylsalicylic acid orally once daily for 30 days.
Figure 1 - Preoperative: Extensive scalping with an area of 550cm² and periosteum lesion
Figure 1 - Preoperative: Extensive scalping with an area of 550cm² and periosteum lesion
Concomitantly with the fixation of the muscular part of the large dorsal flap at the
edges of the residual scalp, a partial skin graft of the left thigh was obtained with
Blair knife for grafting into the muscle bed of the flap, along with the simultaneous
closure of the donor area of the right dorsal large flap, which occurred with several
points of attachment of Vicryl 2.0 and tubular suction drain number 4.8. The surgery
lasted a total time of 6 hours and 35 minutes. The patient progressed well in the
postoperative period and without complications, hospitalized in the ICU for two days,
for rigorous hemodynamic monitoring, and another three days in the ward. After one
month of surgery, the first photos were documented (Figure 2).
Figure 2 - Postoperative 1 month
Figure 2 - Postoperative 1 month
After six months, the patient underwent a new surgery under general anesthesia for
flap slimming, thus providing a better aesthetic contour of the flap on the scalp
(Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 3 - Postoperative period of 6 months after flap weight loss
Figure 3 - Postoperative period of 6 months after flap weight loss
Figure 4 - Postoperative period of 6 months after flap weight loss
Figure 4 - Postoperative period of 6 months after flap weight loss
The current methodology was the retrospective analysis of the medical records of the
patient in question. The present work follows the standards of Helsinki’s declaration
and the ethics and research committee’s approval under number 2486.
DISCUSSION
In this case report, the patient presented extensive loss of scalp (550cm²) with
a partial lesion of the periosteum in the central parietal part, thus making it impossible
to make grafting on a skull cap and local flaps. The exposed skull cap without periosteum,
even with daily dressings, is a common source of chronic osteomyelitis and erosion
of the external table, making it necessary to cover the wound with a muscle flap to
bring perfusion to this previously devitalized area. The muscle flap has the advantage
over the skin flap due to its higher capillary density. Furthermore, the muscle with
pedicle parallel to its axis is preferable to the perforating flap due to its vessels’
better accommodation against the skull cap1-13.
As in this case, large avulsions and total avulsions of the scalp, undoubtedly the
best results are achieved through immediate microsurgical reimplantation. For reimplantations,
there is a need to preserve at least one main vascular pedicle 12. However, the patient’s avulsioned scalp was totally unfeasible by the dog’s bite
in the present case, making it impossible.
Beasley et al., in 200413), propose a staging system for the selection of the type of flap to be used for reconstruction,
based on the etiology and size of the defect, previous treatment and future treatment
planning. For scalp defects, they suggest: smaller than 200cm² can be closed primarily
or with local flaps; for smaller under 200 cm² associated with severe trauma, osteomyelitis
or osteoradionecrosis, previous radiation, previous local flap and postoperative radiotherapy
plan recommend muscle flaps free from the abdominal rectum or latissimus dorsi with
cutaneous graft; muscle flaps free of latissimus dorsi with skin graft are used; in
those over 600 cm², the combination of two latissimus muscle flaps free from the dorsum
with a skin graft should be used1-13.
The latissimus muscle of the back associated with the skin graft is currently the
flap of choice for scalp reconstruction, whose reimplantation is not feasible12. The thoracodorsal vascular pedicle measured approximately 8.5cm. The arterial diameter
is approximately 2.5 mm, permeates the muscle with dimensions of approximately 25x35cm
and can be dissected with a cutaneous island of 10x22cm, infused by perforating vessels,
allowing the primary closure of the donor area. For scalp wounds, the length of the
thoracodorsal pedicle allows anastomosis in both superficial and cervical vessels.
The intermuscular blood supply of the latíssimo of the back allows the muscle to be
divided into distinct muscle flaps to cover complex three-dimensional defects. If
a larger amount of tissue is required, the serratus muscle and the scapular flap can
be added to the vascular pedicle1-13. In this case, a musculocutaneous flap was used, in which the cutaneous part of the
patient had the function of perfusion coverage and monitoring of the flap and the
muscle part as an excellent vascularized receptor bed for partial grafting.
The head and neck region has an extensive bilateral vascular network, easily accessible
for free tissue transfer. The preferred receptor vessel in the upper third of the
face is the superficial temporal artery and vein. If this vessel is not available,
lower branches of the external carotid system (facial, upper thyroid and transverse
cervical) can be used1,12.
Among the most frequent complications of this type of procedure are total or partial
necrosis of the flap, non-integration of the cutaneous graft and seromas in the donor
area (large dorsal muscle). In the series of Ioannides et al., in 1999 11), in which 31 patients with scalp defects treated with free flaps were reported, there
was a loss of only one (3.2%) free flap of large dorsal muscle, due to venous congestion,
being within acceptable limits of 6.6% for this area of the body reported by Kroll
et al., in 199614. There was only a small partial loss of the skin graft, with no major complications
in the present case.
Multiple methods have been described to refine scalp reconstruction, including serial
excision, local flap transposition, tissue expansion and follicular micrografts in
muscle flaps with skin grafts 12.
Scalp reconstruction with a large dorsal muscle-free flap can reestablish the skull
cap’s cover with sufficient perfusion to nourish the outer table and prevent or treat
any subclinical infection. The form is also restored satisfactorily. The limitation
is due to the area of alopecia, which can be circumvented by employing hair prosthesis
(“wigs”) or adornments such as scarves. In this case, the transplantation of hair
follicle units or tissue expansion would not be a good option since the residual area
with hair is very scarce, and most of the flap was composed of muscle with skin graft
and scar areas.
As the patient is satisfied, using scarves and hair prosthesis, no more surgical complements
were proposed at the moment. The patient, who is a hairdresser by profession, went
through the trauma of scalp avulsion and reported having refound her self-esteem after
reconstructive plastic surgery.
CONCLUSION
The free flap of the large dorsal muscle effectively reconstructed extensive scalp
lesions with 550cm² and partial periosteum lesions due to scalping. The flap recovered
the shape of the skull and the protective function of the skull cap.
REFERENCES
1. Neligan PC. Cirurgia plástica: princípios. 3a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2015.
2. Cunha CB, Sacramento RMM, Maia BP, Marinho RP, Ferreira HL, Goldenberg DC, et al.
Perfil epidemiológico de pacientes vítimas de escalpelamento tratados na Fundação
Santa Casa de Misericórdia do Pará. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2012 Mar;27(1):3-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1983-51752012000100003
3. Van Driel AA, Mureau MA, Goldstein DP, Gilbert RW, Irish JC, Gullane PJ, et al. Aesthetic
and oncologic outcome after microsurgical reconstruction of complex scalp and forehead
defects after malignant tumor resection: an algorithm for treatment. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 2010 Ago;126(2):460-70.
4. Lutz BS, Wei FC, Chen HC, Lin CH, Wei CY. Reconstruction of scalp defects with free
flaps in 30 cases. Br J Plast Surg. 1998 Abr;51(3):186-90.
5. Ribeiro NS. Necessidade e dilemas das famílias vítimas de escalpelamento atendidas
na FSCMP: desafios para o serviço social [dissertação]. Belém: Universidade Federal
do Pará (UFPA); 2009.
6. Newman MI, Hanasono MM, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ. Scalp reconstruction: a
15-year experience. Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Mai;52(5):501-6.
7. Spies M, McCauley RL, Mudge BP, Herndon DN. Management of acute calvarial burns in
children. J Trauma. 2003;54(4):765-9.
8. Hartford CE. Preservation of devitalized calvarium following high-voltage electrical
injury: case reports. J Trauma. 1989 Mar;29(3):391-4.
9. Dalay C, Kesiktas E, Yavuz M, Ozerdem G, Acarturk S. Coverage of scalp defects following
contact electrical burns to the head: a clinical series. Burns. 2006 Mar;32(2):201-7.
10. Wright HR, Drake DB, Gear AJ, Wheeler JC, Edlich RF. Industrial high-voltage electrical
burn of the skull, a preventable injury. J Emerg Med. 1997 Jun;15(3):345-9.
11. Ioannides C, Fossion E, McGrouther AD. Reconstruction for large defects of the scalp
and cranium. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1999 Jun;27(3):145-52.
12. Mélega JM. Cirurgia plástica: reconstrução de couro cabeludo e calota craniana. Cap
66.
13. Beasley NJ, Gilbert RW, Gullane PJ, Brown DH, Irish JC, Neligan PC. Scalp and forehead
reconstruction using free revascularized tissue transfer. Arch Facial Plast Surg.
2004 Jan/Fev;6(1):16-20.
14. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GR, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL, et al. Choice of
flap and incidence of free flap success. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Set;98(3):459-63.
1. Plastic Surgery Service Prof. Dr. Ricardo Baroudi, Plastic Surgery, Campinas, SP,
Brazil.
2. Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Corresponding author:
Daniel Nowicki Kaam Avenida Benjamin Constant, 1971, Apt 1603, Cambuí, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Zip Code:
13025-005 E-mail: danielnkaam@gmail.com
Article received: July 03, 2020.
Article accepted: July 23, 2020.
Conflicts of interest: none