ISSN Online: 2177-1235 | ISSN Print: 1983-5175
Letter to the Editor - Year2019 - Volume34 - Issue 2
Hello,
Gynecomastia is a commonly treated cosmetic problem with an average worldwide incidence of 32%-36%1. On clinical examination, gynecomastia is graded depending on the amount of breast tissue and the looseness of the skin over the breast. Simon’s grading is simple and used widely2. However, one additional factor that we assess is the skin tone, which means that while skin excess is the loose skin on top of the breast tissue, skin tone is the inherent capacity of the skin to shrink and contract after the surgery. As per Simon’s grading, gynecomastia is graded as follows:
• Grade 1: Minor breast enlargement with no excess skin
• Grade 2a: Moderate breast enlargement with no excess skin
• Grade 2b: Moderate breast enlargement with excess skin
• Grade 3: Marked breast enlargement with excess skin
While skin excess has a linear progression from grades 1 to 3, skin tone can be independent of it. Moreover, this often neglected factor can be the difference between a well-sculpted chest and an average result.
The revised grading we suggest is as follows:
• Grade IT: Small enlargement, no skin excess, and normal skin tone
• Grade 1L: Small enlargement, no skin excess, and poor skin tone (indicating laxity)
• Grade IIAT: Moderate enlargement, no skin excess, and normal skin tone
• Grade IIAL: Moderate enlargement, no skin excess, and poor skin tone
• Grade IIBT: Moderate enlargement, minimal skin excess, and normal skin tone
• Grade IIBL: Moderate enlargement, minimal skin excess, and poor skin tone
• Grade IIIT: Marked enlargement, a lot of excess skin, and normal skin tone
• Grade IIIL: Marked enlargement, a lot of excess skin, and poor skin tone
This gives us a better picture and assessment of how well the skin is likely to shrink for the same grade of gynecomastia. For example, a man with grade 2a Simon’s gynecomastia can have a very poor skin tone that may lead to an imperfect skin retraction even after a similar surgery as in another individual with the same grade of gynecomastia. Once the surgeon takes into account the skin tone, he may even predict the extent of skin sculpting that can be achieved after gynecomastia surgery. Moreover, the skin tone may be affected by various factors like smoking, diabetes, and poor general heath. Using this revised grading not only predicts the surgical outcome in terms of the skin sculpting but also helps during follow-up and in comparing different patients with the same grade in a more accurate manner.
COLLABORATIONS
|
SH |
Analysis and/or data interpretation, conception and design study, conceptualization, data curation, final manuscript approval, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, realization of operations and/or trials, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing - original draft preparation, writing - review & editing. |
REFERENCES
1. Petty PM, Solomon M, Buchel EW, Tran NV. Gynecomastia: evolving paradigm of management and comparison of techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(5):1301-8.
2. Simon BE, Hoffman S, Kahn S. Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;51(1):48-52.
1. Contura Clinic, Plastic and Cosmetic
Surgery, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Corresponding author: Sreekar Harinatha, 2nd Floor, Above KFC, 80 feet Kammanahalli Main road, HRBR 3rd Block, Kalyan Nagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, Índia, Zip Code: 560043. E-mail: drsreekarh@yahoo.com
Article received: March 02, 2018.
Article accepted: April 16, 2019.
Conflicts of interest: none.
Indexers
All scientific articles published at www.rbcp.org.br are licensed under a Creative Commons license