INTRODUCTION
Cleft lip and palate, the most common congenital malformations that affect the
head and neck, occur due to lip and palate fusion failure in intrauterine
life1-3. They can be divided into isolated cleft lip, cleft
palate, and cleft palate3-6. The prevalence of this disease is
uncertain, but it affects approximately 1 in every 700 live births depending on
factors such as ethnicity, geographical origin, and socioeconomic level4. It may occur in isolation or associated
with syndromes. It is estimated that 50–70% of clefts occur in isolation or in a
non-syndromic form1,4.
The frequency of cleft lip and palate differs between the sexes. While cleft lip
with or without cleft palate affects more males, the presentation is inverted
with isolated cleft palate, which affects more females at a ratio of 2:1. As for
laterality, unilateral cleft lip is more prevalent on the left side than the
right, also by a ratio of 2:12,4,7-9.
The etiology is diverse and uncertain due to embryological error, being
influenced by genetic, environmental, and socioeconomic factors1,4. Studies indicate that smoking, drugs, parents’ age, social class,
consanguinity, and ethnicity are involved in the onset of this malformation,
relating in different ways to the occurrence of fissures1,4,5,10,11. Gestational
history, drug use, and family history are essential to possible associated
genetic factors. Folic acid is a protective factor7.
Based on embryological origin, Spina proposed a classification of clefts
considering their position in relation to the incisive foramen. In group I,
complete pre-incisive foramen cleft, which affects the lip, dental alveolus, and
nasal floor, and incomplete, which affects only the lip. Group II includes
trans-incisive foramen clefts. Group III refers to clefts that only affect the
palate, which can be complete or incomplete. Cleft lip and palate can be
unilateral or bilateral5,7.
The diagnosis of oral clefts can be done during prenatal monitoring with
ultrasound. Hard palate clefts are difficult to visualize and can only be
diagnosed after the 28th week. Thus, in general, only cleft lip is
diagnosed in the early prenatal period during the first trimester7,12,13. Surgical
correction of oral clefts can occur according to the cleft type presented and
the treatment protocol established by each service7,14,15.
OBJECTIVE
Few studies have assessed the epidemiological profile of patients with oral
clefts, especially in Brazilian territories. Given the need to better understand
this profile, the present study aims to describe the frequency of cleft types
and the prevalence of surgical procedures in patients with cleft lip and palate
who attended and underwent surgery at the Multidisciplinary Service of Care for
Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate of the Hospital Regional da Asa Norte (HRAN),
Brasília, Federal District (DF).
METHODS
This retrospective descriptive study was performed at the Multidisciplinary
Service of Care for Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate of the HRAN located in
the city of Brasília, DF. This is a medium-sized hospital and a reference center
for the care of patients with cleft lip and palate in the Midwest region. The
present study was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Health
Sciences Teaching and Research Foundation (FEPECS) (protocol
53767715.4.0000.5553) and conducted in accordance with Resolution No. 196/96,
which oversees research involving human beings.
The study population comprised all patients undergoing surgical procedures of the
Multidisciplinary Service of Care for Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate between
August 2013 and July 2017. Patients for whom information was missing from their
medical records were excluded from the study.
The researchers collected data from the medical records of patients diagnosed
with cleft lip and palate in an Excel spreadsheet. The variables analyzed
included date of surgery, patient sex, patient age at surgery, surgery
performed, diagnosis according to Spina classification, laterality of clefts,
and family history of clefts and associated anomalies. Subsequently, a
statistical analysis was performed with the proportions tests and Chi-square
test using R software for Windows.
RESULTS
Between August 2013 and June 2017, 586 patients were surgically treated in this
service, but only 322 met the study’s inclusion criteria. Of the 322 patients
enrolled in the service, 169 were male (52.48%). Patient age ranged from less
than 1 year to 53 years, with a median of 1.87 years.
Patient origin was variable. The reference service assists the Federal District
and surrounding areas. However, some patients are from the North and Northeast
regions of Brazil.
Patient Diagnosis
For both sexes, the left and bilateral foramen clefts were the most prevalent
(20.50% and 18.94%, respectively). The proportions test yielded a
p value of 0.6098. As observed in Table 1, in males, the most common
clefts were bilateral trans-foramen (21.30%), left trans-foramen (18.93%),
and right trans-foramen clefts (15.38%). The proportions test yielded a
p value of 0.2974. In females, the more frequent clefts
were left trans-foramen (22.22%), bilateral trans-foramen (16.34%), and
incomplete post-foramen clefts (16.34%) (p = 0.2354).
Table 1 - Patient diagnosis by sex.
Diagnosis (cleft) |
Male |
Percentage |
Female |
Percentage |
Total |
Percentage |
Incomplete left pre-foramen |
14 |
8.28% |
11 |
7.19% |
25 |
7.76% |
Incomplete right pre-foramen |
6 |
3.55% |
9 |
5.88% |
15 |
4.66% |
Bilateral incomplete pre-foramen |
3 |
1.78% |
0 |
0.00% |
3 |
0.93% |
Complete left pre-foramen |
9 |
5.33% |
7 |
4.58% |
16 |
4.97% |
Complete right pre-foramen |
14 |
8.28% |
11 |
7.19% |
25 |
7.76% |
Bilateral complete pre-foramen |
3 |
1.78% |
3 |
1.96% |
6 |
1.86% |
Left trans-foramen |
32 |
18.93% |
34 |
22.22% |
66 |
20.50% |
Right trans-foramen |
26 |
15.38% |
16 |
10.46% |
42 |
13.04% |
Bilateral trans-foramen |
36 |
21.30% |
25 |
16.34% |
61 |
18.94% |
Complete post-foramen |
11 |
6.51% |
12 |
7.84% |
23 |
7.14% |
Incomplete post-foramen |
15 |
8.88% |
25 |
16.34% |
40 |
12.42% |
Total |
169 |
100.00% |
153 |
100.00% |
322 |
100.00% |
Table 1 - Patient diagnosis by sex.
Cleft Laterality
Initially, the frequency of laterality (uni- and bilateral) of the most
common clefts, pre-foramen and trans-foramen clefts of patients, in general
and by sex (Table 2) were analyzed.
In the study population, a left unilateral cleft was the most common in both
sexes. Thereafter, the prevalence of pre- and trans-foramen clefts was
analyzed by sex and in general (Table 3) since they were the most common in both sexes. As the
proportion test revealed a p value less than 0.001, the
trans-foramen clefts are more prevalent.
Table 2 - Cleft laterality by sex.
Laterality |
Male |
Percentage |
Female |
Percentage |
Total |
Percentage |
Right unilateral |
46 |
32.17% |
36 |
31.03% |
82 |
31.66% |
Left unilateral |
55 |
38.46% |
52 |
44.83% |
107 |
41.31% |
Bilateral |
42 |
29.37% |
28 |
24.14% |
70 |
27.03% |
Total |
143 |
100.00% |
116 |
100.00% |
259 |
100.00% |
Table 2 - Cleft laterality by sex.
Table 3 - Cleft type by sex.
Diagnosis (cleft) |
Male |
Percentage |
Female |
Percentage |
Total |
Percentage |
Pre-foramen |
49 |
34.27% |
41 |
35.34% |
90 |
34.75% |
Trans-foramen |
94 |
65.73% |
75 |
64.66% |
169 |
65.25% |
Total |
143 |
100.00% |
116 |
100.00% |
259 |
100.00% |
Table 3 - Cleft type by sex.
Statistical tests were performed to analyze whether the clefts (pre- and
trans-foramen) were related to sex among patients treated in this service.
Tests were also performed to identify if the cleft laterality (uni- or
bilateral) had a predilection to either sex. According to the Chi-squared
test (Table 4), in the population
studied, both the diagnosis of laterality and the clefts themselves are
independent of patient sex.
Table 4 - Statistical analysis of laterality and sex versus diagnosis and
sex.
Test |
Sex |
N (%) |
Chi-square test |
Ratio (F/M) |
Laterality |
Female |
116 (44.8%) |
x2 = 1.301
|
1 : 1.23 |
Male |
143 (55.2%) |
p = 0.52 |
Pre-foramen x trans-foramen |
Female |
116 (44.8%) |
x2 = 0.03
|
1 : 1.23 |
Male |
143 (55.2%) |
p = 0.85
|
Table 4 - Statistical analysis of laterality and sex versus diagnosis and
sex.
Kinship
The heredity of the clefts by sex from 2015 to 2017 was subjectively
analyzed. Most of the patients had no relatives with this diagnosis. Among
males, 77.78% had no relatives with oral cleft, whereas in females, 83.05%
had no affected relatives.
Associated Malformations
When analyzing the presence of malformations associated with oral cleft of
patients by sex, one can observe that 90.46% of the cleft patients do not
have this diagnosis. In males, only 9.36% of the patients presented with
this diagnosis compared to 9.74% of females.
Among the 9.56% syndromic cleft patients, 5 had cardiac malformations; 1 had
thoracic malformation; 1 had cranial malformation; 2 had intellectual
disability; and 6 had two or more associated malformations, the most
prevalent being cardiac, ocular, limbs, and urinary system.
Type of surgery
As shown in Figure 1, at HRAN Cleft
Center, the most frequent surgery is cheiloplasty, followed by
palatoplasty.
Figure 1 - Surgery type overall and by sex.
Figure 1 - Surgery type overall and by sex.
Age
Figure 2 shows the relationship between
patient age at surgery, type of surgery performed (palatoplasty,
cheiloplasty, or rhinoplasty), and sex. For palatoplasty, the median age for
both sexes was 3 years (mean age of females, 9 years; mean age of males, 6
years). For cheiloplasty, the mean age was 4 years for males and 8 years for
females. The median age was before the first year of life and 1.42 years,
respectively, in males and females. For rhinoplasty, the mean age was 20.54
years (median, 17 years) for males and mean was 19.2 years (median, 22.71
years) for females.
Figure 2 - Boxplot of age by surgery type.
Figure 2 - Boxplot of age by surgery type.
DISCUSSION
A referral center requires the services of several professionals to offer a
complete and qualified treatment for cleft patients. However, Paranaíba et
al.15 reported that 75% of the
treatment units in Brazil have only the following specialists in their services:
plastic surgeon, dental surgeon, and speech therapist. At the HRAS, the
following professionals are recommended in the interdisciplinary team: plastic
surgeon, otorhinolaryngologist, craniofacial surgeon, dentist,
odontopediatrician, orthodontist, nutritionist, speech therapist, psychologist,
pediatrician, nurse, social worker, and geneticist.
The exact prevalence of cleft lip and palate in Brazil is not known. Studies
performed in other centers reported a prevalence of malformation at 0.49 in Rio
Grande do Norte; 0.88 in Porto Alegre, RS; and 1.54 in Bauru, SP, for every 1000
live births3,6,16. As cleft lip and palate became a notifiable disease in the DF in
September 2017 (Law 5.958/2017), it was not possible to determine its prevalence
in the analyzed period (August 2013 to June 2017) in the literature or by using
data from the government. Thus, there is a possibility of underreporting, which
would have hindered the determination of its prevalence in the local
population.
Regarding sex, published reports indicate an increased frequency of oral clefts
in males2,8,9,16-22. Although
169 of the 322 children studied (52.48%) were boys, it was not possible to
affirm this in the population studied, as there was no statistical
relevance.
Of the total of 322 records of oral clefts of patients of HRAN, there is a
greater proportion of labial clefts and trans-foramen clefts (80.4%) when
compared to isolated cleft palate (19.6%). This finding is in agreement with the
literature, in which there are reports of predominance of cleft lip and palate
ranging between 69.1% and 81%, taking pre-foramen clefts and trans-foramen
clefts as a joint entity 10,19.
As for the diagnosis by the Spina classification, the most prevalent types of
clefts were left trans-foramen (20.50%) and bilateral cleft (18.94%), followed
by right trans-foramen clefts (13.04%) and incomplete post-foramen clefts (12.
42%). As the p value was greater than 0.05 (p-value of 0.6098), it is not
possible to state the prevalence of any type of cleft in this study. However,
the literature reports a predominance of left trans-foramen clefts followed by
incomplete post-foramen clefts18. Studies
that do not discriminate laterality also reported higher frequencies of
trans-foramen clefts (24.89 - 37.1%) and post- foramen clefts (26.9 - 31.7%)
17,20.
Regarding the distribution of cleft type by sex, left trans-foramen clefts were
more common in females (22.22%), while bilateral trans-foramen clefts were more
common in males (21.30%). However, the p valuefor both sexes was greater than
0.05, so it is not possible to determine the prevalence of cleft type in this
sample, although studies in Eslováquia, Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Minas Gerais
(BR), and Pernambuco (BR) reported the prevalence of cleft lip with or without
involvement of the palate was higher in boys and the incidence of isolated cleft
palate was higher in females4,7-9,18-22. Regarding
laterality, there was a greater prevalence of unilateral left clefts (41.31%),
which were 1.3-fold more common than right unilateral clefts (31.66%).
Similarly, in the medical literature, left clefts are more commonly
described2,8,9,13,16-18,20-22.
Although the etiology is multifactorial, inheritability is reported in the
scientific community as the most important factor of oral cleft involvement. The
risk of a child being born with a cleft is increased by 40-fold when the parents
have this malformation2,5. In this study, 19.85% of patients had a
family history of oral clefts, a value close to that observed in the literature
(23%)5.
According to the literature, trans-foramen clefts are the most prevalent and
there is a higher incidence in males (1.5:1.0)23. In line with the literature, in the present study, trans-foramen
clefts were also the most common (65.25%). However, there was no statistically
significant influence of sex in the diagnosis of trans-foramen cleft in the
sample studied.
In Brazil, few studies have analyzed the frequency and type of congenital
malformations associated with patients with cleft lip and palate5. A study conducted in 2014 in the state of
Paraíba and one in 2005 in São Paulo reported that 7% and 9.18% of the clefts
were syndromic, respectively5,24. Of the
patients treated at the HRAN, only 9.54% have associated malformations. This
underscores the importance of patients with cleft lip and palate being examined
in detail to detect other associated malformations5.
According to the literature, malformations of the lower and upper limbs are the
most common (33%), followed by malformations of the cardiovascular system
(24%)7. Among the cleft patients
treated at the HRAN, cardiac malformations were the most prevalent (25.8%).
The treatment of oral clefts is surgical and each reference center has its own
treatment protocol. In accordance with the protocol established by the Cleft
Service of the HRAN, cheiloplasty is the first procedure performed in patients
with cleft lip and palate; just the lip is corrected in infants under 3 months
of life once they reach the minimum organic condition required to undergo
general anesthesia7,14.
The fact that 80% of the patients treated at the HRAN had pre-foramen and
trans-foramen clefts explains why cheiloplasty is the most common surgical
procedure performed by the service. The results of this study show that the mean
age of males is 4 years while that of females is 8 years, while the median is
before the first year of life and 1.42 years in males and females. Nevertheless,
some patients underwent cheiloplasty belatedly, thus changing the mean. This
could occur because the HRAN cleft service treats patients regardless of age at
presentation; or difficulty accessing the health service; or after a late
diagnosis. Consequently, treatment is not always performed at the age
recommended by the protocol. However, it is interesting to note that, as the
results reveal, most of the patients treated at this service receive surgical
treatment in the first year of life.
According to the HRAN protocol, palatoplasty is performed in patients with cleft
lip and palate at the age of at least 18 months and when their weight is
appropriate. In this study, 36.08% of patients underwent this surgical
procedure. The median age in both sexes was 3 years, while the mean age of
females was 9 years and that of males was 6 years. Thus, as with cheiloplasty,
this surgery is also performed in older ages in this service, likely for similar
reasons.
Rhinoplasty is also part of the treatment protocol in cases of nasal deformity.
Thus, it is less common and performed only after correction of the cleft lip and
palate or when the patient is at least 16 years old14. At the HRAN, in agreement with the literature, only
6.82% of patients underwent this surgical procedure. The mean age was 20.54
years and the median age was 17 years, in line with published
recommendations.
According to Paranaíba et al.15, the
techniques of Veau and Van Langenbeck are the most commonly used in
palatoplasties in international reports. In cheiloplasties, a review of
Brazilian surgical protocols showed a preference for the Millard technique for
unilateral cheiloplasty and of the Spina and Millard techniques for bilateral
cases. In the cleft department of HRAN, the majority of surgeries are performed
using the Fisher or Millard techniques for cheiloplasties and the Van Langenbeck
and Sommerlad techniques for palatoplasty.
CONCLUSION
The epidemiological profile of patients with cleft lip and palate treated at the
HRAS indicates that the majority of patients are male with non-syndromic
diagnoses and no family history of this diagnosis. It was not possible to
determine a prevalence between the sexes. Trans-foramen clefts were most common,
mainly left sided. The most frequent surgery was cheiloplasty, since pre-foramen
and trans-foramen clefts were the most common. However, the exact prevalence of
this malformation in the DF could not be found in the period analyzed using the
local literature and governmental data.
COLLABORATIONS
EVR
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, data curation, formal analysis,
writing - original draft preparation.
|
TOP
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, formal analysis.
|
GNM
|
Formal analysis.
|
LRR
|
Conception and design study.
|
LGM
|
Conception and design study, supervision.
|
MDS
|
Supervision.
|
DRP
|
Final manuscript approval, writing - review & editing.
|
REFERENCES
1. Aquino SN, Paranaíba LM, Martelli DR, Swerts MS, Barros LM, Bonan
PR, et al. Study of patients with cleft lip and palate with consanguineous
parents. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(1):19-23. PMID: 21340184 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000100004
2. Gardenal M, Bastos PRHO, Pontes ERJC, Bogo D. Prevalent Diagnosis of
Orofacial Fissures in a Reference Service with Resident Cases in the State of
Mato Grosso do Sul. Int Arch Otorrinolaringol. 2011;15(2):133-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-48722011000200003
3. Cunha ECM, Fontana R, Fontana T, Silva WR, Moreira QVP, Garcias GL,
et al. Anthropometry and risk factors in newborns with facial clefts. Rev Bras
Epidemiol. 2004;7(4):417-22.
4. Dixon MJ, Marazita ML, Beaty TH, Murray JC. Cleft lip and palate:
synthesizing genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet.
2011;12(3):167-78.
5. Baptista EVP. Malformações congênitas associadas à fissura labial
e/ou palatal em pacientes atendidos em um serviço de referência para tratamento
de defeitos da face: um estudo de série de casos [dissertação]. Recife:
Instituto Materno Infantil Professor Fernando Figueira; 2007.
6. Bruner G, Montagnana M, Correa AC, Degan VV, Tubel CAM. Prevalence
of lip and palate cleft in Rio Claro - SP, from 2006 to 2009. Odontol Clín
Cient. 2012;11(2):117-9.
7. Watson ACH, Sell DA, Grunwell P. Tratamento de Fissura Labial e
Fenda Palatina. São Paulo: Santos; 2005.
8. Pacáková D, Zábavníková M, Miklošová M, Kúkel'ová D,
Dankovčík R. Epidemiological Study of Orofacial Clefts among Population
of Eastern Slovakia during the Period 1996-2013. Cent Eur J Public Health.
2016;24(2):128-32.
9. Martelli DR, Coletta RD, Oliveira EA, Oliveira MC, Swerts MS,
Rodrigues LA, et al. Association between maternal smoking, gender, and cleft lip
and palate. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;81(5):514-9.
10. Loffredo LCM, Freitas JAS, Grigolli AAG. Prevalence of oral clefts
from 1975 to 1994, Brazil. Rev Saúde Pública. 2001;35(6):571-5.
11. Dolovich LR, Addis A, Vaillancourt JM, Power JD, Koren G, Einarson
TR. Benzodiazepine use in pregnancy and major malformations or oral cleft:
meta-analysis of cohort and case-control studies. BMJ. 1998;317(7162):839-43.
PMID: 9748174
12. Vaccari-Mazzetti MP, Kobata CT, Brock RS. Antenatal ultrasonography
diagnosis of cleft lip and palate. Arq Catarin Med. 2009;38(Suppl
1):130-2.
13. Bunduki V, Ruano R, Sapienza AD, Hanaoka BY, Zugaib M. Prenatal
Diagnosis of Lip and Palate Cleft: Experience of 40 Cases. Rev Bras Ginecol
Obstet. 2001;23(9):561-6.
14. Trindade IEK, Silva Filho OM. Fissuras labiopalatinas: uma abordagem
interdisciplinar. São Paulo: Santos; 2007.
15. Paranaíba LMR, Almeida H, Barros LM, Martelli DRB, Orsi Júnior JD,
Marteli Júnior H. Técnicas cirúrgicas correntes para fissuras lábio-palatinas,
em Minas Gerais, Brasil. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol.
2009;75(6):839-43.
16. Figueirêdo CJR, Vasconcelos WKS, Maciel SSSV, Maciel WV, Gondim LAM,
Tassitano RM. Prevalência de fissuras orais no Estado do Rio Grande do Norte,
Brasil, entre 2000 e 2005. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2011;29(1):29-34.
17. Freitas JAS, Dalben GS, Santamaria Júnior M, Freitas PZ. Current
data on the characterization of oral clefts in Brazil. Braz Oral Res.
2004;8(2):128-33.
18. Vasconcelos BCE, Oliveira e Silva ED, Porto GG, Pimentel FC, Melo
PHNB. The incidence of the lip and palate malformations. Rev Cir Traumat
Buco-Maxilo-Fac. 2002;2(2):41-6.
19. Paranaíba LMR, Miranda RT, Ribeiro LA, Barros LM, Martelli-Júnior H.
Frequency of congenital craniofacial malformations in a Brazilian Reference
Center. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2011;14(1):151-60.
20. Di Ninno CQMS, Fonseca LFN, Pimenta MVE, Vieira ZG, Fonseca JA,
Miranda ICC, et al. Epidemiological survey of patients with cleft lip and/or
palate at a specialized center in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Rev CEFAC.
2011;13(6):1002-8.
21. Coutinho ALF, Lima MC, Kitamura MAP, Ferreira Neto J, Pereira RM.
Epidemiological characteristics of patients with orofacial clefts attending a
Referral Center in Northeast Brazil. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant.
2009;9(2):149-56.
22. Gundlach KK, Maus C. Epidemiological studies on the frequency of
clefts in Europe and world-wide. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34 Suppl
2:1-2.
23. Kuhn VD, Miranda C, Dalpian DM, Moraes CMB, Backes DS, Martins JS,
et al. Fissuras labiopalatais: revisão da literatura. Disciplinarum Sci.
2012;13(2):237-45.
24. Sousa ALB. Incidência e caracterização de fendas orofaciais em
nascidos vivos registrados em dados do SINASC (DATASUS) - Paraíba - de 2002 a
2010 [Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso]. João Pessoa: Universidade Estadual da
Paraíba; 2014.
1. Hospital Regional da Asa Norte, Brasília, DF,
Brazil.
Corresponding author: Tayane Oliveira
Pires SMHS - Área Especial, Q. 101, Asa Sul - Brasília, DF, Brazil
Zip Code 70330-150 E-mail: tayaneoliveirap@gmail.com
Article received: December 18, 2018.
Article accepted: February 10, 2019.
Conflicts of interest: none.