INTRODUCTION
Reconstruction of the plantar region is still one of the greatest challenges in
reconstructive plastic surgery1,2. The tissues in this region have
unique characteristics essential for maintaining the functionality of the limb.
We can mention local characteristics: strong adhesion between the skin and deep
structures, providing stability when walking; the presence of a thick cushion,
allowing impact absorption when walking.
Of the entire plantar region, the heel region is the area with the greatest
weight-bearing and subjected to the greatest impact. To this end, it is richly
vascularized and has fibrous septa that connect the dermis to the periosteum
of
the calcaneal bone, forming fat compartments3-7.
We must, therefore, look for tissues with similar characteristics for the
reconstruction of plantar defects in the heel8.
There are several methods of reconstruction of the plantar region, ranging from
skin grafting to microsurgical flaps, but few meet all of these needs1,2,8-14.
The medial plantar fasciocutaneous flap is an excellent option, as it represents
similar tissue and maintains sensitivity to the recipient area15,16.
Initially described in 1981 by Harrison & Morgan9, the medial plantar flap is based on the medial
plantar artery and maintains local sensitivity through cutaneous branches of
the
medial plantar nerve17. Since
then, several studies have been described in the literature, but few evaluate
its use in cancer patients18,19.
OBJECTIVE
To describe a series of 7 cases of reconstruction of heel defects after resection
of acral lentiginous melanoma, performed at the Plastic Surgery Service of the
Instituto do Câncer of the State of São Paulo, from July 2013 to September
2019.
METHOD
A retrospective study collected data from medical records of patients who
underwent reconstruction of the heel region with a medial plantar flap from July
2013 to September 2019.
Patients were selected according to the type of reconstruction used after
resection of acral lentiginous melanoma by the Sarcoma and Melanoma Group at
the
Instituto do Câncer of the State of São Paulo. The inclusion criteria for the
study were: patients admitted to the Instituto do Câncer of the State of São
Paulo for resection of acral lentiginous melanoma of the heel region, undergoing
reconstruction with a medial plantar flap.
Of the 7 patients, 3 (42.8%) were female, and 4 (57.1%) were male (Table 1). Six patients (85.7%) had some
associated comorbidity, with smoking and systemic arterial hypertension being
the most prevalent comorbidities. The average age of the patients was 57.3
years, ranging from 45 to 73 years.
Table 1 - Patient characteristics, type of reconstruction performed, and
complications related to the procedures.
|
Age |
Sex |
Histologic Type
|
Comorbidities |
Additional
local reconstruction
|
Donor area |
Retail complications
|
Donor
area complications
|
1 |
58 |
M |
Acral Melanoma
|
Smoking,
SAH
|
No |
Partial skin
grafting
|
Necrosis |
No |
2 |
53 |
M |
Acral Melanoma
|
Smoking, hypertension, DM
|
No |
Partial skin grafting |
Necrosis |
No |
3 |
64 |
M |
Acral Melanoma
|
Smoking, hypertension, alcoholism, CKD
|
No |
Partial skin
grafting
|
No |
No |
4 |
73 |
M |
Acral Melanoma
|
Smoking, hypertension, previous
AMI
|
No |
Partial skin grafting |
No |
No |
5 |
51 |
F |
Acral Melanoma
|
Smoking, rheumatoid arthritis
|
Total
skin grafting
|
Partial skin
grafting
|
Não |
Graft
loss
|
6 |
45 |
F |
Acral Melanoma
|
|
No |
Partial skin grafting |
No |
No |
7 |
57 |
F |
Acral Melanoma
|
SAH |
No |
Partial skin
grafting
|
Necrosis |
No |
Table 1 - Patient characteristics, type of reconstruction performed, and
complications related to the procedures.
The HCFMUSP Ethics Committee approved the study for Analysis of Research Projects
(CAAE Number: 56849422.0.0000.0068).
Surgical technique
The posterior tibial artery is identified through palpation posterior to the
medial malleolus, and a broken line demarcation is made just above this
region.
The skin island is demarcated according to the size of the defect in the heel
region and can extend across the entire area outside of plantar support.
The incision begins with the demarcation posterior to the medial malleolus,
and the posterior tibial artery is identified. The medial edge of the flap
is incised, and the artery is dissected until its bifurcation. The medial
branch is identified between the abductor hallucis and flexor digitorum
brevis muscles. The flap is then elevated by including the plantar fascia
and the lateral branch of the medial plantar nerve, sparing the medial
innervation of the hallux.
The lateral, distal, and proximal edges are incised as the dissection
progresses. The flap is transposed to the heel defect, and the donor area is
reconstructed with a partial skin graft from the ipsilateral thigh (Figures 1 and 2).
Figure 1 - A: Intraoperatively, after resection of the
lesion with margins. B: Immediate postoperative
reconstruction with a pedicled medial plantar flap on the heel
and partial skin grafting on the flap donor area.
Figure 1 - A: Intraoperatively, after resection of the
lesion with margins. B: Immediate postoperative
reconstruction with a pedicled medial plantar flap on the heel
and partial skin grafting on the flap donor area.
Figure 2 - Postoperative result, with adequate functional and aesthetic
results.
Figure 2 - Postoperative result, with adequate functional and aesthetic
results.
RESULTS
One patient required additional reconstruction with local skin grafting; in the
others, the medial plantar flap was sufficient to cover the dry areas. In all
cases, partial skin grafting was performed in the flap donor area.
Lymphadenectomy was performed in 3 patients (42.8%), 2 (28.6%) in the left
inguinal region, and 1 (14.3%) in the left inguinal region associated with the
left iliac-obturator region. Among the 7 patients, 2 had metastatic disease
(28.6%).
Surgical complications were observed in 3 patients, all over 50 years old and/or
had some associated comorbidity. The flap survival rate was 57%. Regarding
complications, there were 3 total flap necrosis (42.9%) and 1 total graft loss
in the donor area (14.3%). Of the 3 patients with flap necrosis, 2 required
subsequent local reconstruction with an anterolateral fasciocutaneous
microsurgical thigh flap and 1 with a lateral fasciocutaneous microsurgical arm
flap.
One of the patients with total necrosis of the medial plantar flap underwent
resection of acral lentiginous melanoma on the left lower limb, with immediate
reconstruction with a medial plantar flap. He progressed well during
hospitalization and was discharged on the seventh postoperative day. He returned
for an outpatient consultation on the 11th postoperative day,
presenting a flap with signs of distress at the edges. We opted for expectant
treatment of the complication, and the flap presented total necrosis on the
26th postoperative day. Debridement and reconstruction with an
anterolateral thigh microsurgical flap were performed. Currently, the patient
presents a good appearance of the flap and good functionality of the left lower
limb.
DISCUSSION
Reconstruction of the soft tissues of the heel still represents a challenge for
plastic surgeons due to the scarcity of local tissues and the complexity of this
reconstruction to preserve functionality.
During surgical planning, it is important to assess whether the plantar injury is
located in a support area, as grafts in this region can develop complications
such as ulceration, scar retraction, pain, bone deformities, and inability to
walk.
Initially described in 1981, the medial plantar flap still represents one of the
best options for reconstruction of the heel region, especially on its plantar
surface9. Among its
advantages, the following stand out: similar local tissue and preserved
innervation.
The local tissue is formed by a thick pad of skin without hair follicles, which
provides adequate coverage for the pressure area and support for the patient’s
weight and is aesthetically more favorable. Innervation through the cutaneous
branch of the medial plantar nerve allows the patient to maintain sufficient
tactile sensitivity for adequate ambulation and limb protection.
As a disadvantage of the medial plantar flap, we can mention the morbidity of the
donor area, located in the plantar cavity region, which constitutes an area of
non-support and where partial skin grafting is necessary. Despite the section
of
the medial plantar artery, the foot maintains its adequate vascularization
through the deep plantar arch, formed by the foot’s lateral and dorsal plantar
arteries.
The medial plantar flap has the following limitations: size and depth of the area
to be reconstructed, limited to smaller defects. Larger resections should
preferably be reconstructed with fasciocutaneous or musculocutaneous
microsurgical flaps, and alternatively, they can be reconstructed with the
reverse sural flap.
Although the medial plantar flap is described in the literature with low
complication rates, most published studies describe the medial plantar flap in
patients suffering from trauma or pressure ulcers, with a lower average
age4,8,11,16,17,20,21. This work focused on cancer
patients, who typically have multiple comorbidities, advanced age, and,
therefore, atheromatosis, a selection bias that could explain the higher rate
of
complications in this study. Furthermore, the study was carried out in a
teaching hospital, where the surgical procedures were performed by different
surgeons still on the learning curve.
CONCLUSION
The medial plantar flap is versatile and has a well-known vascular anatomy.
Today, it presents itself as a great alternative for conducting oncological
reconstructions of defects in the plantar region of the foot. However, the
choice of the ideal patient must be considered, and remember that the dissection
of the vascular pedicle is not easy to perform.
1. Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São
Paulo, SP, Brazil
2. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina,
Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Corresponding author: Giulia Godoy Takahashi Rua
Arruda Alvim, 423, apto 51, Pinheiros, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, Zip Code:
05410-020, E-mail: giu.godoy@gmail.com