INTRODUCTION
Chest wall reconstruction after extensive resection due to advanced breast cancer
remains a challenge for oncologic and plastic surgeons. However, in the last decade,
improved surgical techniques have allowed extensive resection and reconstruction in
patients with tumors involving the chest wall tissue or bone structures, with functional
and aesthetic results and cancer-free margins, a critical element for decreased disease
recurrence1.
This case report describes the application of the thoracoabdominal flap technique
after locally advanced tumor mastectomy in a patient with breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) mutation.
CASE REPORT
A 40-year old woman presented to the oncology service with a locally advanced breast
tumor after undergoing chemotherapy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy. She reported the
onset of a nodule in her left breast one year before, which grew and progressed after
chemotherapy. The tumor was a non-special-type invasive carcinoma of grade T4BN2MO-IIIB
(Figure 1), was triple negative, and had a Ki-67 score of 70%. A pathogenic mutation was identified
in the BRCA1 c.3331_3334delCAAG gene (p.Gln1111Asnfs*5). Treatment with three cycles of doxorubicin
(60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) every 21 days resulted in disease progression. A new treatment with paclitaxel (175
mg/m2) every 21 days showed no clinical response. The patient then underwent combined radiotherapy
and chemotherapy with cisplatin (30 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (100 mg/m2) weekly, which showed a partial response (Figure 2). Physical examination showed an ulcerated tumor measuring 30 x 20 cm affecting the
entire left breast with confluent, movable left axillary metastasis. Ultrasound revealed
two benign nodules (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System [BI-RADS] III) in the
right breast measuring 1.5 cm each at the union of the upper and lateral quadrants.
A left mastectomy was indicated, including axillary dissection and resection of both
right breast nodules with intraoperative freezing. The patient underwent a left mastectomy
with resection of nearly the entire pectoral muscle and homolateral axillary lymphadenectomy
up to level three (Figures 3 and 4). The great dorsal plexus and the long thoracic nerve were preserved. Freezing of
the margins and resected right nodules were negative for neoplasia. The large defect
was reconstructed with a fasciocutaneous thoracoabdominal flap based on the posterior
intercostal arteries (Figures 5 and 6). The patient was discharged on the first postoperative day for which she reported
low-intensity pain (visual analog scale 3). The suction drain was removed 10 days
after surgery. The small area of flap dehiscence was locally treated and showed good
results (Figure 7). Two months after the surgical treatment, the patient continues cancer treatment
using capecitabine. After completing chemotherapy, a laparoscopic prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy
is scheduled to evaluate if there is no early disease recurrence. This case report
was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (Opinion No. 2,948,415), and the patient
provided an informed consent form.
Figure 1 - Locally advanced breast tumor before radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Figure 1 - Locally advanced breast tumor before radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Figure 2 - Tumor after radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Figure 2 - Tumor after radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Figure 3 - Left mastectomy specimen showing involvement of the breast (25 x 20 cm, reduced by
5 cm after radiotherapy.
Figure 3 - Left mastectomy specimen showing involvement of the breast (25 x 20 cm, reduced by
5 cm after radiotherapy.
Figure 4 - Left mastectomy specimen showing involvement of the breast (25 x 20 cm, reduced by
5 cm after radiotherapy).
Figure 4 - Left mastectomy specimen showing involvement of the breast (25 x 20 cm, reduced by
5 cm after radiotherapy).
Figure 6 - Breast reconstruction with thoracoabdominal flap.
Figure 6 - Breast reconstruction with thoracoabdominal flap.
Figure 5 - Thoracoabdominal flap.
Figure 5 - Thoracoabdominal flap.
Figure 7 - Healing flap after 15 day.
Figure 7 - Healing flap after 15 day.
DISCUSSION
Locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC) is a grade III cancer (IIIA, IIB and IIIC),
defined as tumors measuring >5 cm (T3) or affecting the chest wall (T4a), skin (T4b),
or both (T4c) or as extensive lymph node involvement (N2/N3) of one or more lymphatic
chains and inflammatory carcinoma. LABC includes 10%-25% of all breast cancers in
developed countries and 40%-50% of those in developing countries2.
LABC treatment including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy, has
increased survival rates. Studies prior to the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neo-CT)
showed overall survival (OS) of 25% after 5 years. The use of neo-CT resulted in 5-year
OS of 80% and 45% in patients with IIIA and IIIB disease, respectively. Thus, neo-CT
is recommended in patients with LABC and cases with inadequate response to neo-CT.
As in the present study, radiotherapy may make surgical resection easier or more feasible3.
Unilateral breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations should undergo contralateral mastectomy when diagnosed at early stages.
However, the literature does not support prophylactic contralateral mastectomy (PCM)
for locally advanced disease4. Based on the literature and joint decision with the patient, PCM was not performed,
since freezing examination of the nodules in the opposite breast showed a fibroadenoma.
Radical surgical removal in these patients results in extensive skin loss in the thoracic
region that cannot be repaired with primary closure. The use of flaps, such as myocutaneous
flaps, provides effective coverage for major defects but requires longer surgical
time, increasing morbidities that may delay additional treatment5, especially in patients with triple-negative tumors with residual tumor after neo-CT.
In these cases, the administration of capecitabine may increase survival6,7.
However, despite the specific indication for myocutaneous flaps for chest reconstruction
after mastectomy, locoregional fasciocutaneous flaps are important. These flaps are
quickly made, have low morbidity, and present partial necrosis rates similar to those
for myocutaneous flaps, despite the restricted amount of skin that can be mobilized
and previous radiotherapy8. For these reasons, we applied this technique in the present case.
Regional fasciocutaneous flaps should be well vascularized, as in the present case,
based on posterior intercostal artery irrigation to ensure that there is no wall suffering,
necrosis, or destabilization9.
The extent of resection should always be enough to treat the disease; however, breast
reconstruction surgeons are indispensable for surgical planning to make subsequent
reconstruction easier10. Thus, interdisciplinary treatment benefits patients.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study corroborate the use of fasciocutaneous thoracoabdominal
flap reconstruction as an effective technique to cover large areas after mastectomy
without other flaps or skin grafts. The present case confirmed that interdisciplinary
treatment is important for good surgical outcomes.
COLLABORATIONS
DRSF
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, Conception and design study, Data Curation, Final
manuscript approval, Methodology, Project Administration, Writing - Original Draft
Preparation
|
ALNA
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, Conception and design study, Data Curation, Final
manuscript approval, Methodology, Project Administration, Realization of operations
and/or trials, Writing - Original Draft Preparation
|
RJVV
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, Final manuscript approval, Realization of operations
and/or trials, Writing - Original Draft Preparation, Writing - Review & Editing
|
SCV
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, Conception and design study, Data Curation, Final
manuscript approval, Methodology, Realization of operations and/or trials, Writing
- Original Draft Preparation, Writing - Review & Editing
|
REFERENCES
1. Persichetti P, Cagli B, Tenna S, Fortunato L, Vitelli CE. Role of cutaneous thoraco-abdominal
flap in the surgical treatment of advanced stage breasttumors. Suppl Tumori. 2005
May/Jun;4(3):S177.
2. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the
AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4.
3. Sanchez AM, Franceschini G, Orlandi A, Di Leone A, Masetti R. New challenges in multimodal
workout of locally advanced breast câncer. Surgeon. 2017 Dec;15(6):372-378.
4. Murphy BL, Hoskin TL, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, Glazebrook KN, Hieken TJ. Contralateral
Prophylactic Mastectomy for Women with T4 Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Ann Surg
Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3365-70.
5. Burattini ACB, Piteri RCO, Ferreira LF, Silveira Junior VF, Broetto J, Richter CA,
et al. Safety and viability of a new format of thoracoepigastric flap for reconstruction
of the chest wall in locally advanced breast cancer: a cross-sectional study. Rev
Bras Cir Plást. 2016;31(1):2-11.
6. Székely B, Silber AL, Pusztai L. New Therapeutic Strategies for Triple-Negative Breast
Cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017 Feb;31(2):130-7.
7. Masuda N, Lee SJ, Ohtani S, Im YH, Lee ES, Yokota I, et al. Adjuvant Capecitabine
for Breast Cancer after Preoperative Chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun;376(22):2147-2159.
8. Deo SV, Purkayastha J, Shukla NK, Asthana S. Myocutaneous versus thoraco-abdominal
flap cover for soft tissue defects following surgery for locally advanced and recurrent
breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2003 May;83(1):31-5.
9. Dast S, Berna P, Qassemyar Q, Sinna R. A new option for autologous anterior chest
wall reconstruction: the composite thoracodorsal artery perforator flap. Ann Thorac
Surg. 2012 Mar;93(3):e67-9.
10. Franco D, Tavares Filho JM, Cardoso P, Moreto Filho L, Reis MC, Boasquevisque CHR,
et al. Plastic surgery in chest wall reconstruction: relevant aspects - case series.
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2015 Dec;42(6):366-370.
1. Universidade Estadual do Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
2. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, Clinica Oncocenter, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
3. Clínica Oncobem, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
4. Clinica Oncocenter, Teresina, PI, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Danilo Rafael da Silva Fontinele Rua Agnelo Pereira da Silva, 2570, São João, Teresina, PI, Brazil. Zip
code: 64045-420. E-mail: drsilvafontinele@gmail.com
Article received: January 6, 2019.
Article accepted: April 21, 2019.
Conflicts of interest: none.