INTRODUCTION
The reconstruction of extensive defects of the anterior thoracic region is a
great challenge for plastic surgeons. The successful use of skin, muscle, and
myocutaneous proximal flaps, as well as free and pedicled omentum flaps, for
this type of repair has been described1,2.
In cases of mediastinitis after cardiac surgeries in which bleeding areas are
extensive and require covering with well-vascularized tissue, the use of omentum
flaps has proved to be very useful, to have wide coverage, to be safe from a
circulatory viewpoint, and to be associated with less morbidity for the
patient3-6.
We report an extremely severe case of mediastinitis after cardiac surgery in
which the patient presented an extensive bleeding area that affected the entire
anterior chest region, with poor granulation tissue and exposure of the ribs,
sternum, and pericardium. We used a skin coverage with pedicled omentum flap
rotation in the left gastroepiploic vessels, followed by partial meshed skin
grafting in a second surgery.
CASE REPORT
A 70-year-old male patient was admitted to the hospital in September 2016. He
underwent myocardial revascularization in March 2016 in another medical service
center in the State of Pará. He developed operative wound infection and
mediastinitis, for which he received several iterations of surgical debridement
and negative pressure dressing.
He also developed an acute vascular abdomen in August 2016, that is, a few days
before arriving at our hospital. According to data from the hospital where the
procedure was performed, the jejunum and ileum had extensive necrosis,
justifying the need to resect approximately 3 m of the small intestine, starting
at 30 cm from the Treitz angle, and to consequently perform a jejunostomy
procedure.
Upon arrival at our service, his general condition was poor, and vasoactive drugs
were used to maintain blood pressure. He presented an extensive bleeding area
in
the anterior thoracic region, no visible sternum, and exposure of the
pericardium, ribs, and intercostal musculature.
The cutaneous ulcer measured approximately 19 cm in width and 23 cm in length
longitudinally and presented a poor granulation tissue (Figures 1 and 2). He
also presented a recent middle incision in the upper abdominal wall, at a
distance of 9 cm from the ulcer, and partial dehiscence. The lower right
pectoral region had a recent scar in the lateroposterior direction, of
approximately 14 cm long.
Figure 1 - Open bleeding area in the anterior chest wall with exposure of
the sternum, ribs, and pericardium.
Figure 1 - Open bleeding area in the anterior chest wall with exposure of
the sternum, ribs, and pericardium.
Figure 2 - Open bleeding area in the anterior chest wall with exposure of
the sternum, ribs, and pericardium.
Figure 2 - Open bleeding area in the anterior chest wall with exposure of
the sternum, ribs, and pericardium.
Along with intensive clinical care to control infection foci (lung and urine) and
advanced life support, local wound care was initiated. Surgical debridement,
hyperbaric oxygen therapy in a monoplace chamber, and negative pressure dressing
were performed using silver foam (KCI).
Twenty days after the implementation of this therapeutic scheme and with evident
improvement of the local wound conditions, the patient underwent a sternal
approximation performed by the thoracic surgery team and omentum flap rotation
performed using video-laparoscopy by the digestive tract surgery team. The flap
generated was based on the vascular pedicle of the left gastroepiploic artery
and transferred to the thoracic region by a layer of skin between the upper
abdominal incision and the ulcer (Figures 3
and 4).
Figure 3 - Intraoperative aspect of the omentum flap already transferred to
the bleeding area.
Figure 3 - Intraoperative aspect of the omentum flap already transferred to
the bleeding area.
Figure 4 - Aspect of the omentum flap on the sixth postoperative
day.
Figure 4 - Aspect of the omentum flap on the sixth postoperative
day.
Moist dressings were placed daily to ensure flap hydration, and >25 days were
necessary to obtain an appropriate granulation tissue, which allowed cutaneous
coverage. Then, a split mesh skin graft of the right thigh was performed with
an
electric dermatome, with the integration of approximately 90% of the grafted
area (Figure 5).
Figure 5 - Final aspect after a meshed skin graft.
Figure 5 - Final aspect after a meshed skin graft.
Figure 5 shows the appearance of the
reconstruction site 3 weeks after the skin grafting. At the time, we were
planning a new skin graft in the small residual bleeding area, the patient
presented a recurrent intestinal bleeding that progressed to hemodynamic
instability and irreversible cardiopulmonary arrest.
DISCUSSION
Postoperative cardiac surgery mediastinitis is a serious complication and
requires a fast and multidisciplinary treatment, coordinated between the
different teams involved, to reduce the high rates of morbidity and mortality.
Its incidence rate is 0.5% to 4%, and the mortality rate is approximately 50%
7. For such cases, the objectives are
to control infection, stabilize the chest wall, and provide a cutaneous wound
coverage as soon as possible.
The plastic surgeon initially performs hygienic procedures to remove purulent
collections and debridement of devitalized tissues, sparing the largest possible
amount of viable tissue and visualizing the possibility of local reconstruction
in the near future. The plastic surgeon is also responsible for the orientation
and realization of various types of bandages, which are available in the market,
among which is the negative pressure dressing, which is of great value in the
treatment of complex wounds.
Where the chest wound is clean and the patient is stable, from a clinical point
of view, many possibilities for reconstruction can be considered, depending
primarily on the size of the defect and the conditions surrounding the
ulcer8. Minor injuries can be rebuilt
with local skin or fasciocutaneous flaps from nearby regions. They present less
morbidity but are less reliable from a circulatory viewpoint, as they are
usually pedicle flaps selected at random.
Larger, high-secretion wounds require a reconstruction with more vascularized
tissues, which is more reliable from a circulatory viewpoint. In these
situations, muscular and myocutaneous flaps of the major pectoralis or dorsal
large muscle are the most frequently indicated.
The transfer of great omentum flaps for the reconstruction of thoracic defects
has also been described and well accepted in the world literature owing to its
low morbidity and high success rate.
As patients are always treated when already presenting severe conditions, all
these reconstruction techniques are high-risk surgeries, and no consensus has
been reached in the literature about which flap is the best option for each type
of patient. We believe that each case should be well analyzed on an individual
basis to choose the most suitable method.
We report a case of reconstruction of an extensive anterior thoracic defect with
exposure of the pericardium and all ribs. As the wound edges were far apart,
local structures could not be used. An extensive skin incision was present on
the right side, and the pectoral muscles were practically absent and bilaterally
retracted due to possible prior resection.
Despite a recent history of abdominal surgery to partially resect the small
intestine, we opted to use the great omentum flap. Hence, we requested the
assistance of colleagues from the general surgery service, who managed to assess
the conditions of the great omentum by using videolaparoscopy and to make a
pedicled flap on the left gastroepiploic artery, which, after passing through
the subcutaneous tunnel, was enough to cover the entire bleeding area. The
integration of a meshed skin graft 3 weeks after flap rotation complemented this
operative strategy.
In our view, the great omentum flap proved to be a good option owing to its
vascular, lymphatic, and immune properties, as well as its adhesion to the
receptor site.
Its wide vascularization with extensive vessel network increases the number of
possible positions. In addition, the production of angiogenic factors is great,
which allows rapid neovascularization and adhesion of the repositioned tissue
to
the recipient area. Owing to its rich network of lymphatic tissue, which
promotes good immune competence, it plays an important role in preventing local
infections4.
The literature shows that using the great omentum flap can present complications
at the donor site, such as abdominal hernia, small intestine obstruction, and
bleeding5.
In our environment, Tavares et al.9
published their experience of using this flap in reconstructing the chest wall
in 2 cases after extensive breast tumor resections. This allowed us to conclude
that the procedure is effective, safe, and quite functional.
CONCLUSION
No consensus has been reached on the best type of reconstruction for extensive
anterior chest wall defects; however, the great omentum flap, which was used
herein, proved to be a good option in situations of great difficulty (prior
recent abdominal surgery). This is due to its good blood and lymphatic
vascularization and wide coverage, given its size and mobility.
Although this technique is not new, this case appeared to be a great challenge
due to the extensive lesion. This study shows that the omentum flap can be used
even in patients with recent abdominal surgeries for intestinal resections.
COLLABORATIONS
OMA
|
Analysis and/or interpretation of data; final approval of the
manuscript; completion of surgeries and/or experiments; writing the
manuscript or critical review of its contents.
|
RGA
|
Completion of surgeries and/or experiments.
|
DO
|
Completion of surgeries and/or experiments.
|
CED
|
Completion of surgeries and/or experiments.
|
PV
|
Completion of surgeries and/or experiments.
|
FAH
|
Completion of surgeries and/or experiments.
|
MLMA
|
Conception and design of the study; writing the manuscript or
critical review of its contents.
|
FS
|
Conception and design of the study; writing the manuscript or
critical review of its contents.
|
REFERENCES
1. Matros E, Disa JJ. Uncommon flaps for chest wall reconstruction.
Semin Plast Surg. 2011;25(1):55-9. DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1275171 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1275171
2. Domene CE, Volpe P, Onari P, Szachnowicz S, Birbojm I, Barreira LF,
et al. Omental flap obtained by laparoscopic surgery for reconstruction of the
chest wall. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8(3):215-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00019509-199806000-00011
3. van Wingerden JJ, Lapid O, Boonstra PW, de Mol BA. Muscle flaps or
omental flap in the management of deep sternal wound infection. Interact
Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13(2):179-87. DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2011.270652 DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2011.270652
4. Zbuchea A, Racasan O, Oprescu N. Trans-Retroperitoneal Omental Flap
for Reconstruction of a LargeThoraco-Dorsal Defect, Following Oncological
Resection - Case Report and Literature Review. Chirurgia (Bucur).
2016;111(2):161-4.
5. Hamid UI, Parissis H. Treatment of severe mediastinitis following
cardiac surgery with omental flaps. BMJ Case Rep. 2011;2011. pii: bcr0320113971.
DOI: 10.1136/bcr.03.2011.3971 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bcr.03.2011.3971
6. Spindler N, Etz CD, Misfeld M, Josten C, Mohr FW, Langer S. Omental
flap as a salvage procedure in deep sternal wound infection. Ther Clin Risk
Manag. 2017;13:1077-83. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S134869 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S134869
7. Toumpoulis IK, Anagnostopoulos CE, Derose JJ Jr, Swistel DG. The
impact of deep sternal wound infection on long-term survival after coronary
artery bypass grafting. Chest. 2005;127(2):464-71. PMID: 15705983 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.2.464
8. Kaul P. Sternal reconstruction after post-sternotomy mediastinites.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;12(1):94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0656-7
9. Tavares FMO, Menezes CMGG, Moscozo MVA, Xavier GRS, Oliveira GM,
Amorim Jr MAP, et al. Omental flap: an alternative in reconstructive surgery
of
chest wall. Rev Bras Cir Plast. 2011;26(2):360-5.
1. Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo, SP,
Brazil.
2. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, São
Paulo, SP, Brazil.
3. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São
Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
4. Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP,
Brazil.
Corresponding author: Otavio Machado de
Almeida
Rua Barata Ribeiro, 490 Cj 51 - Bela Vista
São Paulo, SP,
Brazil Zip Code 01308-000
E-mail: omadr@terra.com.br
Article received: August 15, 2017.
Article accepted: May 17, 2018.
Conflicts of interest: none.