INTRODUCTION
Dermatofibrosarcoma is a rare cancer, representing 1% of all skin sarcomas and
less than 0.1% of all tumors1.
This disease was initially reported by Darier and Fernand in 1924 as an
unfamiliar condition and only later identified by Hoffman as
dermatofibrosarcoma2.
It is considered an uncommon soft tissue tumor, affecting approximately 0.8 to 5
people per million3. The
proportion of affected individuals is similar between men and women. Although
it
can occur at any age, it is most commonly observed from the second to the fifth
decade of life2.
The tumor exhibits characteristics such as slow growth, aggressive tissue
invasion, and a high risk of recurrence. However, metastasis is rarely
observed3. Initially,
it was believed to originate from fibroblasts, but immunohistochemistry analysis
suggested its origin from dendritic cells of the skin4.
Dermatofibrosarcoma is most frequently found on the chest and extremities of the
body, with approximately 10% to 15% of cases occurring on the head and neck.
It
initially presents as a painless, flat lesion with the same color as healthy
skin or rose-colored. As a result, it can be mistaken for some benign
conditions, leading to delayed diagnosis, sometimes even up to a few
years3.
The recommended treatment for dermatofibrosarcoma is surgical excision of the
lesion with wide margins and primary reconstruction. An excisional biopsy alone
is insufficient, as at least 2 cm of free margins or Mohs micrographic surgery
is necessary5,6. Currently, Mohs micrographic surgery is
considered the gold standard for treatment, regardless of the tumor’s location.
Case series analyses and retrospective studies have demonstrated that this
technique has lower recurrence rates and preserves more healthy tissue compared
to the traditional technique with wide margins3.
This study was accepted by the ethics committee - #24859519.0.0000.5509.
A sixty-year-old man, social drinker, and smoker for 27 years (from 18 to 45)
complained of a forehead skin lesion next to the right orbit in the glabella
for
6 years. He underwent surgical resection under local anesthesia in 2013 and
2017, with a pathological diagnosis of dermatofibroma spreading to muscle with
the recommendation for immunohistochemistry evaluation; however, it had not been
performed. A mobile subcutaneous nodular lesion measuring 2.5 cm located on the
right glabella was detected (Figure 1).
There were no palpable lymph nodes. The ultrasonography showed a highly
vascularized nodule measuring 19 x 17 x 16 mm with a hypoechoic halo. The
immunohistochemical analysis of both previous biopsies indicated
dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with a proliferation index (Ki67) of 10%. MRI
scan revealed an expansive lesion with 25 x 18 x 21 mm in contiguity with the
bone, however, without erosion. Surgical resection with intraoperative frozen
sections was performed to determine free margins (Figure 2). After two margin augmentations next to the nasogenian
groove, they were tumor-free. The reconstruction was performed with a midfrontal
flap based on the left trochlear artery (Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 1 - Lesion before excision
Figure 1 - Lesion before excision
Figure 2 - Lesion excision, including a portion of the nasal bone.
Figure 2 - Lesion excision, including a portion of the nasal bone.
Figure 3 - Demarcation of flap for reconstruction after margins
clearance.
Figure 3 - Demarcation of flap for reconstruction after margins
clearance.
Figure 4 - Patient’s face after the reconstruction with a flap based on the
left trochlear artery.
Figure 4 - Patient’s face after the reconstruction with a flap based on the
left trochlear artery.
Histopathological examination showed low graded cell spindle tumor with discreet
nuclear atypia, low mitotic index, and no necrosis, measuring up to 32 mm in
diameter, spreading into dermis, hypodermis, and striated muscle tissue with
free margins (Figure 5). Thus, the final
diagnosis was dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. The patient evolved
uneventfully.
Figure 5 - Histopathological examination.
Figure 5 - Histopathological examination.
DISCUSSION
Seldom does dermatofibrosarcoma affect the glabella, resulting in few reported
cases in this location. It typically exhibits a slow growth pattern, local
aggressive behavior, and negligible metastatic potential, with high rates of
local recurrence1.
It commonly presents as a violaceous red-blue plaque with gradual growth over the
years, eventually developing multiple nodules within the plaque1. The tumor demonstrates
aggressive local invasion and a high recurrence rate after excision, although
metastasis is rare2. The
diagnosis of dermatofibrosarcoma is often delayed due to its insidious onset
and
appearance that is relatively nonspecific7, and these lesions can be clinically misdiagnosed as
benign entities, as was the case in our patient3.
Dermatofibrosarcoma has been reported to occur on various body surfaces,
primarily the trunk, followed by the extremities, and less commonly on the head
and neck4. Initially, it
superficially adheres to the overlying skin, leading to mobility upon palpation.
However, it may infiltrate adipose tissue in later stages and become fixed to
deeper structures such as fascia and muscle. Delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis
are common, often due to the absence of symptoms or confusion with benign dermal
fibrohistocytic lesions4. The
initial lesion was misdiagnosed as dermatofibroma in our case due to the lack
of
further immunohistochemical evaluation before the patient was referred to our
facility. Other possible differential diagnoses in the early stages include
lipomas, epidermal cysts, nodular fasciitis, and even keloids. As the lesion
becomes more protuberant in the late stages, other soft tissue sarcomas should
be considered in the differential diagnosis4.
MRI scan findings are not specific, typically showing a well-delineated tumor
that appears isointense or mildly hyperintense on T1-weighted images and
hyperintense on T2-weighted images1.
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans occupies a central position within a spectrum of
tumors known as fibrous histiocytomas. These tumors can exhibit relatively
benign behavior, similar to fibrous histiocytomas, or demonstrate more
aggressive features akin to malignant histiocytomas. Histologically,
dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is highly cellular and composed of monomorphic,
fusiform cells with elongated nuclei that show little or no pleomorphism or
hyperchromasia. Mitotic activity is usually moderate. Immunohistochemical
evaluation is necessary for accurate diagnosis5. The diagnosis is confirmed by demonstrating
strong immunoreactivity for CD 344. This patient underwent two surgeries at another facility,
and, most likely, due to the omission of immunohistochemistry evaluation, they
were misdiagnosed as dermatofibroma.
Due to its histological characteristics of poor circumscription and frequent
extension into the dermis, subcutis, and muscles, resection should include wider
and deeper margins than those appreciated clinically or on MRI studies1. The tumor often extends beyond
the clinically determined margins during surgical resection3.
Successful treatment requires deep and wide excision and extensive reconstruction
involving flaps or grafts5.
Micrographic Mohs surgery is considered the optimal treatment for this disease
in all anatomical locations3,6. Recommended excision margins
are 2 cm or even 3 cm for block excision4,5. The recurrence
rate depends on the adequacy of the excision margins4. In our case, intraoperative frozen sections
confirmed disease-free margins, subsequently confirmed by the final
histopathologic examination using paraffin-embedded tissue.
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is uncommon in the glabella region. Given its
proximity to the orbits, its occurrence in this location presents a significant
challenge due to the requirement for radical excision and the potential impact
on both functional and cosmetic outcomes.
REFERENCES
1. Kiratli H, Koç İ, Özkayar Ö, Kösemehmetog Lu K. Sequential
development of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in the forehead and eyelid. Can
J
Ophthalmol. 2017;52(6):e228-30.
2. Simman R, DeFranzo A, Sanger C, Thompson J. Dermatofibrosarcoma
protuberans of the face: surgical management. J Craniofac Surg.
2005;16(3):439-43.
3. Benoit A, Aycock J, Milam D, Brown M. Dermatofibrosarcoma
Protruberans of the Forehead With Extensive Subclinical Spread. Dermatol Surg.
2016;42(2):261-4.
4. Eguzo K, Camazine B, Milner D. Giant dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
of the face and scalp: a case report. Int J Dermatol.
2014;53(6):767-72.
5. Brazzo BG, Saffra N. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the brow and
eyelid. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20(4):332-4.
6. St Clair B, Clark A, Rollins B, Jennings TA. Mohs Micrographic
Surgery for Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans in 15 Patients: The University of
Arkansas for Medical Sciences Experience. Cureus.
2022;14(4):e24147.
7. Haas AF, Sykes JM. Multispecialty approach to complex
dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the forehead. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck
Surg. 1998;124(3):324-7.
1. Universidade Metropolitana de Santos, Santos,
SP, Brazil
2. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP,
Brazil
Corresponding author: Mario Augusto Ferrari de
Castro Rua Dr. Luis de Faria, 109/94, Santos, SP, Brazil, Zip Code:
11060-481, E-mail: mafc@uol.com.br
Article received: November 27, 2022.
Article accepted: August 20, 2023.
Conflicts of interest: none.