INTRODUCTION
Madelung’s disease or Multiple Symmetric Lipomatosis (MSL) is a rare disorder of adipocyte
metabolism, characterized by the accumulation of non-encapsulated adipose tissue,
located symmetrically in the facial region neck, shoulders, trunk, limbs and other
areas1.
Otto Madelung described it in 1888, and, since then, there have been just over 280
reported cases of this disease in the literature. There is no fully clarified pathophysiology
about it, but it seems associated with chronic excessive consumption of alcoholic
beverages. A possible autosomal dominant inheritance with variable penetration of
mitochondrial DNA has been discussed2.
In 1978, Carlsen and Thomsen classified benign lipomatosis into 3 distinct clinical
groups, according to the fat accumulation site, as shown in Chart 13.
Chart 1 - Carlsen and Thomsen classification.
Type 1 Congenital diffuse lipomatosis |
Located principally in trunk, bad delimited from neighboring tissues, not hereditary. |
Type 2 Symmetrical Diffuse Lipomatosis |
Develops at life adult, firstly located in the cervical region, hereditary. |
Type 3 Multiple Lipomatosis |
Numerous small encapsulated subcutaneous lipomas, mainly located on the limbs. |
Chart 1 - Carlsen and Thomsen classification.
The classic clinical presentation of the disease is in adult men, alcoholics with
comorbidities, who notice the appearance of symmetrical lipomatous lesions with slow
and progressive growth. The vast majority of them decrease quality of life due to
the aesthetic damage caused by adipose lesions3.
Computed tomography is the main method for diagnosis, preoperative staging and postoperative
follow-up of patients. The tomographic characteristic of the disease is the distribution
of non-encapsulated and homogeneous lipomatous tissue, with imprecise limits and without
a cleavage plane with the adjacent subcutaneous tissue, and there may also be deep
(submuscular) deposition of adipose tissue4. In some cases, calcifications within the lipomas can be identified.
Complications involved in Madelung’s disease result from compression of the cervical
structures by fat deposition, which can cause dysphagia, odynophagia and hoarseness5. Death resulting from a direct complication of lipomas is quite uncommon; however,
despite being rare, malignant degeneration of Madelung’s disease has already been
reported in the literature6.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study is to report the case of a patient with MSL who was surgically
treated by the combination of lipectomy and liposuction techniques and to discuss
the choice of treatment and its effectiveness, in addition to analyzing the possibilities
of clinical and surgical treatments available so far.
CASE REPORT
A 55-year-old male patient reported the appearance of painless expansive masses in
various parts of the body about a year ago. The progressive growth of these masses
triggered compressive complaints such as dyspnea, dysphagia and dysphonia, and abdominal
pain and aesthetic deformity, with consequent social isolation.
Personal history: Patient with systemic arterial hypertension, a former smoker for
24 years/pack and former alcoholic of spirits (200 ml/day) for 35 years.
Surgical history: Lipoma excision in the right breast region three years ago.
The general physical examination showed no alterations, except for the symmetrical,
non-delimitable and painless masses in the upper part of the body - anterior and posterior
cervical, submental, supraclavicular, deltoid, thoracic, dorsal and abdominal regions
(Figure 1) compatible with Madelung’s disease type I.
Figure 1 - Pre-operative.
Figure 1 - Pre-operative.
There were no significant changes in her laboratory tests. A computed tomography (CT)
scan of the neck was performed (Figure 2), which showed prominence of adipose tissue in the cervical subcutaneous tissue,
more pronounced in the submandibular, posterior cervicodorsal supraclavicular regions.
Chest CT (Figure 3) showed prominence of adipose tissue in the subcutaneous tissue of the breast, anterior
chest wall and dorsal region, including between the muscular planes, with a swelling
effect. Abdominal CT showed prominence of adipose tissue in the abdominal subcutaneous
tissue (Figure 4).
Figure 2 - Neck CT scan - lateral arrow for the accumulation of adipose tissue deposited in the
cervicodorsal region.
Figure 2 - Neck CT scan - lateral arrow for the accumulation of adipose tissue deposited in the
cervicodorsal region.
Figure 3 - Chest CT showing prominence of adipose tissue in the breast, anterior thoracic and
dorsal region
Figure 3 - Chest CT showing prominence of adipose tissue in the breast, anterior thoracic and
dorsal region
Figure 4 - Abdominal CT scan showing prominence of adipose tissue in a diffuse abdominal.
Figure 4 - Abdominal CT scan showing prominence of adipose tissue in a diffuse abdominal.
Once the diagnosis of Madelung’s disease with cervical and trunk involvement was established,
surgical treatment was chosen together between the Head and Neck Surgery and Plastic
Surgery teams from the Celso Pierro Hospital and Maternity, Campinas, SP, in two stages,
combining the methods of cervical lipectomy and abdominal liposuction, taking into
account the symptoms, extent of the lesions, physical deformity and the patient’s
desire. According to the Helsinki principles, the patient signed the Free Informed
Consent Form prior to the surgical procedures.
In the first surgical stage, performed by the Head and Neck Surgery team in September
2019, the patient underwent cervical lipectomy with the removal of three non-encapsulated
fatty lesions (Figure 5), followed by primary closure of the single transverse cervicotomy. The anatomical
pieces were sent for anatomopathological (AP). The AP report revealed histopathology
consistent with lipoma.
Figure 5 - Anatomical pieces removed in the anterior cervicotomy.
Figure 5 - Anatomical pieces removed in the anterior cervicotomy.
In the second surgical time performed by the Plastic Surgery team, in February 2020,
anterior abdominal liposuction was performed, with a wet technique, with the removal
of 1700 milliliters of fat tissue, which was later discarded (Figure 6).
Figure 6 - Product aspirated during abdominal liposuction.
Figure 6 - Product aspirated during abdominal liposuction.
The patient evolved satisfactorily in the postoperative period, did not present surgical
complications, attended follow-up appointments, and performed an evolutionary photographic
record. She received non-pharmacological antithrombotic prophylaxis during the intraoperative
and postoperative periods. In the postoperative follow-up, he was satisfied with the
surgical results, with a significant improvement in appearance (Figure 7), improvement in his clinical complaints, and increased self-esteem. Nowadays, he
has not had recurrences of lesions in the treated regions.
Figure 7 - Postoperative.
Figure 7 - Postoperative.
DISCUSSION
Madelung’s disease or Multiple Symmetric Lipomatosis is a rare disorder of adipocyte
metabolism, predominantly in adult men aged 30 to 60 years. Its slow and progressive
growth can determine social isolation and depression1. Compressive symptoms can arise in the cervical and thoracic territory, giving the
patient a significant loss of quality of life.
After diagnosing this syndrome, a therapeutic plan must be drawn up to guarantee that
patients relief from their symptoms and complaints, both physical and psychological.
The treatment of these patients is palliative and may include clinical and surgical
measures.
In addition to correcting the metabolic syndrome when present, drugs have demonstrated
control over the growth of lesions. The use of beta-2-adrenergic agonists was described
in work by Leung et al. from 1987. This work experimentally presented the use of oral
Salbutamol as a drug to reverse rapidly progressive Madelung’s disease. The recommended
regimen for therapy with Salbutamol consisted of the intake of 12 mg/day divided into
three doses for six months7. However, few studies have proven its effectiveness, and its use is not routine in
treating these patients.
Non-surgical techniques have been developed as an adjunct or substitute for surgery,
such as lipolytic injection. This is performed by applying lipolytic actives, such
as phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate, causing fibrosis of the adipose tissue and
improving the appearance of the disease8. However, its use generates severe adhesions in the treated region, which technically
difficult liposuction or surgical excision in case of recurrence.
Surgical techniques such as adipose tissue resection and liposuction are widely reported
in the literature. It is estimated that 63% of patients have a recurrence in the postoperative
period of open surgery and 95% in the case of liposuction9.
The excision of lipomatous masses is complex, not only because of its extension but
also because of the fibrous, hypervascular and infiltrative nature of this tissue10. As there is no cleavage plane between the lesions and normal adipose tissue, the
total resection of the deposits becomes a major challenge for the surgeon. Despite
rigorous hemostasis and use of drains in the postoperative period, the appearance
of seromas and hematoma is relatively common11.
Liposuction has the advantage of presenting lower perioperative mortality than conventional
surgery, being extremely important since patients commonly have multiple comorbidities12. Its execution presents technical difficulties, such as resistance to penetration
of the cannula due to the fibrous nature of the tissue, profuse bleeding due to the
tissue’s rich vascularization and the need for a cautious approach due to the intimate
relationship of the tissue with vessels and nerves13. Thus, this technique must be performed by experienced hands and in large regions
where open resection is unfeasible.
Constantinidis et al.14, in their 2003 study, used lipectomy and liposuction together to treat neck masses
in 11 patients with Madelung’s disease. Lipectomy was performed first and liposuction
second. During the 32-month postoperative follow-up, all patients showed functional
improvement, and more than 80% of patients were satisfied with the esthetic result.
Two relapses were observed in this study14.
Wollina et al.15, in their 2017 study, described ten cases of Madelung’s disease. Three patients underwent
surgical correction of neck masses by lipectomy (one case) and liposuction (two cases).
In most cases, liposuction was chosen because it is a safe technique, with less downtime
and without extensive scarring. Two patients had a recurrence, one after lipectomy
and the other after liposuction15.
Based on the therapeutic possibilities available in the literature, and the fact that
the patient was young and healthy, we opted for surgical treatment with the combination
of lipectomy and liposuction techniques.
Aiming at greater safety in the procedures, an approach was carried out by two different
teams, each with an emphasis on its area of operation. The Head and Neck Surgery team
performed cervical lipectomy, and the Plastic Surgery team performed abdominal liposuction.
Cervical lesions were addressed by lipectomy, as they were relatively small lesions
and easily accessible by cervicotomy. In abdominal injuries, as they are very extensive
and distributed throughout the abdominal quadrants, liposuction was chosen, resulting
in small, well-positioned scars that allowed the aspiration of a large amount of adipose
tissue in all regions of the anterior abdomen.
As he did not present metabolic syndrome, no additional clinical treatment was proposed,
only oriented to maintain the regular treatment of systemic arterial hypertension.
The patient was informed of the palliative nature of the approaches since fat deposits
can re-accumulate due to the permanence of the defect in lipid metabolism. However,
he judged that the aesthetic and psychological benefits would justify the surgical
interventions.
In the postoperative period, the patient was satisfied with the aesthetic result,
evolved with aesthetically acceptable and well-positioned scars and felt relief from
the compressive symptoms he had already been experiencing.
CONCLUSION
Madelung syndrome is a rare disease, and its etiology is not yet fully understood.
Due to its involvement in different body segments, the interaction between surgical
teams is extremely important in planning the treatment of these patients.
Choosing the right treatment for patients with Madelung syndrome depends on the extent
of the disease, age, associated comorbidities, patient expectations, and the surgical
team’s experience.
Aware of the potential risk of recurrence, these patients need to be advised with
caution in the preoperative period, aligning their expectations with the real palliative
purpose of the treatment and informed of the real chances of recurrence.
In the case reported here, the association between the surgical techniques of lipectomy
and liposuction provided a favorable esthetic result, in addition to not making future
procedures unfeasible, as in the case of lipolytic enzymes, because it was a young
patient with the possibility of recurrence.
This study has a postoperative follow-up of less than one year, with no recurrence
of the lesions so far. This fact makes it impossible to compare the maintenance of
results between the techniques of lipectomy and liposuction.
REFERENCES
1. Chen CY, Fang QQ, Wang XF, Zhang MX, Zhao WY, Shi BH, et al. Madelung’s Disease: Lipectomy
or Liposuction? Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:3975974. DOI: 10.1155/2018/3975974
2. Plummer C, Spring PJ, Marotta R, Chin J, Taylor G, Sharpe D, et al. Multiple Symmetrical
Lipomatosis--a mitochondrial disorder of brown fat. Mitochondrion. 2013;13(4):269-76.
DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2013.03.003 PMid:23524250
3. Carlsen A, Thomsen M. Different clinical types of lipomatosis. Case report. Scand
J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1978;12(1):75-9. DOI: 10.3109/02844317809010484 PMid:663569
4. Bulum T, Duvnjak L, Car N, Metelko Ž. Madelung’s disease: case report and review of
the literature. Diabetol Croat. 2007;36(2): 25-30.
5. Tadisina KK, Mlynek KS, Hwang LK, Riazi H, Papay FA, Zins JE. Syndromic lipomatosis
of the head and neck: a review of the literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39(3):440-8.
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-015-0478-8 PMid:25860506
6. Tizian C, Berger A, Vykoupil KF. Malignant degeneration in Madelung’s disease (benign
lipomatosis of the neck): case report. Br J Plast Surg. 1983;36(2):187-9. DOI: 10.1016/0007-
1226(83)90089-9 PMid:68310198
7. Leung NW, Gaer J, Beggs D, Kark AE, Holloway B, Peters TJ. Multiple symmetric lipomatosis
(Launois-Bensaude syndrome): effect of oral salbutamol. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1987;27(5):601-6.
8. Andou E, Komoto M, Hasegawa T, Mizuno H, Hayashi A. Surgical excision of madelung
disease using bilateral cervical lymphnode dissection technique-its effect and the
influence of previous injection lipolysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(4):e375.
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000337 PMid:25973353 PMCid:PMC4422206
9. Brea-García B, Cameselle-Teijeiro J, Couto-González I, Taboada-Suárez A, González-Álvarez
E. Madelung’s disease: comorbidities, fatty mass distribution, and response to treatment
of 22 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37(2):409-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-012-9874-5
10. Hugo NE, Conway H. Benign symmetric lipomatosis: a case report. Plast Reconstr Surg.
1966;37(1):69-71.
11. Sonni VF, Pires CEB, Kay MS, Neiva IF, Bier GE. Síndrome de Madelung - Relato de caso.
Rev Bras Cir Plast. 1999;14(2):65-74.
12. Adamo C, Vescio G, Battaglia M, Gallelli G, Musella S. Madelung’s disease: case report
and discussion of treatment options. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46(1):43-5.
13. Verhelle NA, Nizet JL, Van den Hof B, Guelinckx P, Heymans O. Liposuction in benign
symmetric lipomatosis: sense or senseless?Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27(4):319-21.
14. Constantinidis J, Steinhart H, Zenk J, Gassner H, Iro H. Combined surgical lipectomy
and liposuction in the treatment of benign symmetrical lipomatosis of the head and
neck. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003;37(2):90-6. DOI: 10.1080/02844310005612
PMid:12755508
15. Wollina U, Heinig B. Madelung’s Disease - Case Series and Treatment by Tumescent Liposuction
or Lipectomy. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017;5(4):427-31.DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2017.114
1. Celso Pierro Hospital and Maternity, Plastic Surgery and Head and Neck, Campinas,
SP, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Amanda Bishop Perseguim, Rua Professor Doutor Euryclides de Jesus Zerbini, 1516 - Parque Rural Fazenda Santa
Cândida, Campinas, SP, Brazil, Zip Code 13087-57, E-mail: amandaperseguim@hotmail.com
Article received: November 29, 2020.
Article accepted: April 19, 2021.
Conflicts of interest: none.