INTRODUCTION
The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) is considered the main focus in the
surgical treatment of facial aging1-6. After the work of Mitz &Peyroniein 19767, dissection of the SMAS became increasingly popular, with the adoption of different
ways of tensioning it since then8-10. It is a fibromuscular fabric composed of several layers divided to envelop the superficial
mimetic musculature. It becomes the best structure we have at our disposal to, safely
and naturally, achieve the elevation and repositioning of the face the neck. It has
a variable thickness, being thinner and discontinuous in the anterior region of the
cheek and thicker and more uniform in the masseteric-parotid and temporoparietal regions
of the forehead, where it is called temporoparietal fascia6,7.
From a functional point of view, the SMAS acts as a distributor and amplifier of facial
muscle activity, and, for rejuvenation, the ideal is that we can pull and increase
the tension of the largest possible area of this structure without forgetting the
temporoorbital region7,8.
Even in the 1980s, Pitanguy2,10, Baker11 and many others dissected the lateral SMAS that directly covers the parotid gland.
This procedure of elevation and traction of the lateral superficial fascia was often
disappointing, as it produced results similar to those of a simple SMAS plication.
In the 1990s, deep dissection and extended procedures such as the deep plane12, the subperiosteal13 and the compound lift14 were the focus.
Almost all tractions are mainly focused on the pre-masseteric and submandibular regions1-6; however, the discussion continues to the present day about what would be the best
way to traction the SMAS. The temporoorbital region (including the tail of the eyebrows)
is often neglected during conventional (non-videoendoscopic) facelifts.
Most patients who are candidates for a facelift or just a blepharoplasty have evident
signs of descent in the lateral region of the orbit and require vigorous repositioning.
In this location, the SMAS (temporoparietal fascia) involves the orbicularis and zygomatic
muscles and often presents significant mobility, requiring tensioning and repositioning
together with the tail of the eyebrows7-9.
We must also consider that the facelift of the lower third, when performed, elevates
a large excess of skin to the temporoorbital region, which added to the pre-existing
dermomuscular redundancy in the lateral corner of the orbit, aggravates the problem
at the site5,10.
In the search for a simple, efficient and safe solution to treat the temporoorbital
and eyebrow tail droop, since August 2017, the author has been performing a temporoorbital
lift tactic with repositioning of the orbicularis muscle and the tail of the eyebrows
that will be described below.
OBJECTIVE
To present a temporoorbital lift tactic with repositioning of the orbicularis and
the tail of the eyebrows for the treatment of aging and sagging of the orbitotemporal
region, easily reproducible, simple, safe and efficient.
METHODS
In August 2017, the author started using the tactic described here in complete facelifts
and, observing its efficiency, from the following month, it started to adopt it in
exclusively temporal lifts. Between September 2017 and October 2020, this treatment
was performed in 358 patients. Of these, only 30 were included in the study, as they
were the ones who underwent exclusively temporal lifts to treat only alterations in
the temporoorbital region, whether or not accompanied by blepharoplasty. The main
exclusion criteria in the analysis were patients undergoing complete facelifts. The
criterion sought to prevent the treatment of the lower third of the face from influencing
the occurrence of complications and our perception of the results in the temporal
area.
Of the 30 patients analyzed, 27 were female (90%), and three were male (10%). Five
underwent temporal lift only (16.6%), and 25 underwent temporal lift accompanied by
blepharoplasties (83.4%). The inclusion criteria encompassed patients who did not
complain or did not present significant signs of sagging and drooping of the lower
third of the face, candidates or not for blepharoplasty, and who presented one or
more of the following signs:
eyebrow tail drop
blepharochalase exceeds the orbital rim in its lateral corner
large skin/muscle redundancy in the lateral corner of the orbits caused by smiling
and with significant “crow’s feet.”
cheek bags or festoons
All cases analyzed were conducted at the Fibonacci plastic surgery clinic in Belo
Horizonte, MG, Brazil, between September 2017 and October 2020.
The analysis of medical records took place between December 2020 and March 2021. The
elaboration of the article followed the Helsinki principles.
Description of the operative tactic: temporal lift
Temporal incisions are made, always intrapilose marginal, in “W”15 and beveled to preserve the follicles on edge. They ranged from 5.0 to 7.5 cm in
length, depending on the degree of elevation intended to be achieved in the tail of
the eyebrows. Lower eyebrows require more cephalad elevation and therefore require
longer temporal incisions, often reaching the tip of the temporal hairy implantation
peninsula.
Then, subcutaneous detachment is performed up to approximately 1 cm from the orbital
rim, with the upper limit being the tail end of the eyebrow and the lower limit being
the most prominent area of the malar region. In this way, we were able to expose a
good part of the temporoparietal fascia, the orbicularis muscle in its lateral portion
and part of the subcutaneous tissue of the malar region (Figure 1).
Figure 1 - Incision and area of detachment.
Figure 1 - Incision and area of detachment.
The detachment is performed superficially to the superficial temporal fascia to avoid
damage to the temporal nerve. Whenever electrocautery is used, the fascia is elevated
with the aid of tweezers and the area is irrigated with saline for the same purpose.
After hemostasis, two sutures are performed that pull the orbicularis muscle. The
first rests close to the temporal prepilous incision at its cephalic limit, transfixing
the temporoparietal fascia and the deep temporal fascia to then encompass, at a distance,
the orbicularis muscle in the most cephalic portion of the detachment and the adjacent
dermis, in the eyebrow tail region (Figure 2).
Figure 2 - Surgical photo and diagram of the area of complete detachment of the temporoorbital
lift with methylene blue marking of the lateral border of the orbicularis muscle and
the direction of muscle traction (also shown by the light blue arrows).
Figure 2 - Surgical photo and diagram of the area of complete detachment of the temporoorbital
lift with methylene blue marking of the lateral border of the orbicularis muscle and
the direction of muscle traction (also shown by the light blue arrows).
In order to achieve adequate traction of the dermis, a considerable amount of the
dermis was included, without the thread being visible on the skin surface (Figure 2). This first traction suture is made with Vicryl 5-0 because, as it encompasses the
dermis, it causes a large depression in the transfixed area and, as the thread is
absorbed, it gradually disappears.
The second traction suture also rests close to the temporal prepilous incision, just
below the first, also deep to ensure secure support for traction. Then it also encompasses,
at a distance, the orbicularis muscle at the level of the lateral corner of the eyelid
and the passage through the muscle is done in two steps (round trip) to avoid fraying.
In this traction, the dermis is spared, and we traction only the muscle. As there
is no skin pinching, non-absorbable colorless Nylon 4-0 thread is used to achieve
vigorous and permanent traction (Figure 2).
These first two traction wires cross the temporal region parallel and with about 1
to 1.5 cm of distance between them. The traction direction of both is always superolateral
oblique, but with the degree of inclination varying according to the needs of each
case.
Likewise, a third traction suture is placed close to the temporal incision, but now
in its caudal portion and also seeking to include the deep temporal fascia. It then
encompasses, at a distance, the SMAS and the malar fat at the end of its detachment.
As with the suture described above, a double pass is performed using a 4-0 colorless
Nylon thread (Figure 3).
Figure 3 - Traction suture of the malar region. Here we see the stride of the point near the
temporal incision involving the deep temporal fascia.
Figure 3 - Traction suture of the malar region. Here we see the stride of the point near the
temporal incision involving the deep temporal fascia.
To achieve a decrease in dead space and, at the same time, uniform distribution of
skin traction, after the three musculoaponeurotic traction sutures, three skin traction
sutures are made in the detached area. All pull exclusively on the dermis and rely
deeply on the edge of the temporal incision, occupying the space between the muscle
tractions (Figure 4). The three dermal transfixations are performed halfway between the temporal incision
and the end of the detachment. Here, a faster absorption thread, Monocryl 5-0, is
used, as there will also be pinching of the skin, which will gradually disappear (Figure 5).
Figure 4 - Traction suture and skin adhesion (black arrow).
Figure 4 - Traction suture and skin adhesion (black arrow).
Figure 5 - Direction of traction of the temporoorbital lift (the green lines represent the direction
of muscle traction and the yellow lines the dermal traction. The red circle represents
the region where we transfixed the skin during the first suture of muscle traction).
Figure 5 - Direction of traction of the temporoorbital lift (the green lines represent the direction
of muscle traction and the yellow lines the dermal traction. The red circle represents
the region where we transfixed the skin during the first suture of muscle traction).
After all the traction/adhesion sutures, the excess skin becomes evident, and, without
any traction, its resection is performed, mirroring the same design of the temporal
incision made previously. The author opts for Gillies sutures with zero tension throughout
the closure. Half of them are removed on the sixth postoperative day and the other
half on the ninth postoperative day (Figure 6).
Figure 6 - Resection of excess temporal skin and tension-free accommodation.
Figure 6 - Resection of excess temporal skin and tension-free accommodation.
RESULTS
What most calls attention to this treatment is the efficiency and durability of the
elevation and, mainly, the lateral opening of the eyebrows tail in all treated cases.
The increase in the distance between the tail end of the eyebrows and the lateral
corner of the eyelids is evident and always significant (Figures 7 and 8).
Figure 7 - Pre and postoperative 6 months of temporal lift and blepharoplasty.
Figure 7 - Pre and postoperative 6 months of temporal lift and blepharoplasty.
Figure 8 - Pre and postoperative 6 months. Note the clear increase in the distance between the
lateral corner of the eyelid and the eyebrow’s tail.
Figure 8 - Pre and postoperative 6 months. Note the clear increase in the distance between the
lateral corner of the eyelid and the eyebrow’s tail.
In addition, a second beneficial and unexpected effect, but always achieved, is the
loss or great decrease of the contractile function of the orbicularis muscle in its
lateral portion (the region where it is tractioned), with great improvement of the
wrinkles called “crow’s feet.” (Figures 9 to 11).
Figure 9 - Pre and 6-month postoperative period of blepharoplasty and temporoorbital lift, in
which there is a great improvement in the positioning of the eyebrow tail and excellent
quality of the pre-pilous temporal scar.
Figure 9 - Pre and 6-month postoperative period of blepharoplasty and temporoorbital lift, in
which there is a great improvement in the positioning of the eyebrow tail and excellent
quality of the pre-pilous temporal scar.
Figure 10 - Pre and 6-month postoperative period of blepharoplasty and temporal lift, in which
a great improvement in the positioning of the eyebrow tail and “crow’s foot” wrinkles
is observed.
Figure 10 - Pre and 6-month postoperative period of blepharoplasty and temporal lift, in which
a great improvement in the positioning of the eyebrow tail and “crow’s foot” wrinkles
is observed.
Figure 11 - Pre and 6-month postoperative period of blepharoplasty and temporo-orbital lift.
Figure 11 - Pre and 6-month postoperative period of blepharoplasty and temporo-orbital lift.
None of the 30 treated cases had complications such as hematomas, paresis, paralysis
or necrosis, and all final discharge and postoperative photographs were performed
six months after the operation.
DISCUSSION
Much is still discussed about the efficiency of the different ways of traction of
the SMAS, and most of the time, the focus of the discussions is the pre-masseteric
and mandibular regions. The temporoorbital region and tail of the eyebrows are often
neglected in non-videoendoscopic facelifts. The author attributes this to the fact
that few truly effective options are described for treating SMAS in this region.
Many patients with an indication for facelift or blepharoplasty have evident signs
of sagging and aging in the lateral region of the orbit, including the tail of the
eyebrows. All of these will require region-specific treatment16 and, in these cases, the SMAS (temporoparietal fascia/orbicularis muscle in its lateral
portion) will often present ample mobility and require aggressive tensioning and repositioning
together with the tail of the eyebrows. In addition, large excess skin from the lower
half of the face and neck in full facelifts will accumulate in the same temporoorbital
region that already has significant dermomuscular redundancy, aggravating the local
problem.
The proposed temporoorbital lift is intended to treat, in a simple, effective, and
highly reproducible way, sagging and aging of the lateral region of the orbit, which
may or may not be associated with a complete facelift and blepharoplasty.
Many years ago, the author chose to use temporal marginal intrapilous incisions in
“W” in all complete or partial facelifts he performs. It is a minimally intrapilous
incision, where about two rows of hairs are sacrificed to make sure that it will be
camouflaged by hairs that will be very close to the margin of the incision that, in
the end, after the resection of excess skin, it becomes pre-pilose. To ensure the
integrity of the bulbs of these edge wires, the incisions are made in a bevel. In
this way, the scar generally has an excellent quality, and we can avoid what the author
believes to be the worst of the sequelae in the temporal region: the retreat of the
anterior line of hairy implantation with consequent enlargement of the temporal region17 (Figure 12).
Figure 12 - Late postoperative periods in which the quality of the temporal scar can be observed.
Figure 12 - Late postoperative periods in which the quality of the temporal scar can be observed.
The variation in the length of the temporal incision and the angle of the musculoaponeurotic
traction sutures allow us to reposition the tail of the eyebrows and the entire temporoorbital
drop according to the needs of each case.
In cases with malar bags or festoons, lateral oblique tractions of the lateral border
of the orbicularis muscle, associated with vigorous cephalic traction of the orbicularis
covering the SOOF (through a lower blepharoplasty) achieve excellent results. In the
author’s view, these tractions have become the best treatment option for these deformities
(Figure 7) and greatly contribute to the result of blepharoplasty in general.
Another extremely beneficial effect of this approach is that, with the traction of
the orbicularis muscles, we can definitively inactivate their contraction in the lateral
portion without running the risk of muscle resections at the site18. This effect significantly reduces wrinkles called “crow’s feet,” simulating the
effect of botulinum toxin. (Figures 10 and 11)19.
In addition to being an excellent alternative to treat temporoorbital sagging in exclusively
temporal lifts, this treatment has also been used in more than 300 complete lifts
(which included the lower third of the face), with excellent results.
Among the open approaches for treating the temporoorbital region17, there are other proposals for broken incisions (Connell)15, for releasing the orbicularis muscle with its transverse bipartition and lateral
traction (Aston)20 and others for myectomy21,22 with or without fat grafts (Viterbo)18. In 2013, Bozola & Vieira proposed treating the temporal region using a marginal
intracapillary incision and temporal detachment in the subcutaneous plane to the lateral
half of the orbicularis muscle, followed by fan traction17.
The author’s approach has several similarities with the Bozola technique and some
important differences, as described below:
Broken temporal incision in “W.”
Orbicularis traction performed at a distance, which reduces the chance of injury to
the frontal branch of the facial nerve, as it prevents the plication from being performed
directly on the nerve path. It also allows us to have deep and secure support for
the traction by supporting it in the deep temporal fascia, very close to the edge
of the temporal incision.
Traction of the dermis of the eyebrow’s tail and the underlying orbicularis muscle
make the repositioning of this area very efficient and makes the fibrosis of each
leaflet help the other maintain the final higher position both.
Traction of the malar SMAS which, in many patients, achieves a significant mobilization
of the middle third and causes more redundancy of the orbicularis muscle in its lateral
portion, which the two upper traction sutures will treat.
CONCLUSION
The search for excellence in treating aging in all face sectors makes it necessary
to constantly search for new tactics and operative techniques that involve facelift.
The few really efficient options for specific treatment of the temporoorbital region
and the excellent results achieved with the operative tactic described make the proposed
temporoorbital lift an excellent option in treating this region. It is a safe, simple
and effective way to treat sagging and aging of the lateral region of the orbit, whether
or not associated with lower third lift and blepharoplasty. The success obtained with
this approach in the first patients led the author to start using it in absolutely
all of our facelift cases, whether complete or only temporary.
REFERENCES
1. Pontes R. O Universo da Ritidoplastia. Rio de Janeiro. Revinter; 2011.
2. Pitanguy I, Radwanski HN, Amorim NFG. Treatment of the Aging Face Using the “Round-lifting”
Technique. Aesthet Surg J. 1999;19(3):216-22.
3. Castro CC. Ritidoplastia: arte e ciência. 1ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: DiLivros; 2007.
4. Rohrich RJ, Narasimhan K. Long-Term Results in Face Lifting: Observational Results
and Evolution of Technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(1):97-108.
5. Cló TCT, Flávio WF, Leão CEG, Cló FX, Lacerda LM, Leão LR. Sistematização perioperatória
para prevenção de hematomas em face-lifts: abordagem pessoal após 1138 casos operados.
Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2019;34(1):2-9.
6. Warren RJ, Neligan P. Cirurgia Plástica Estética. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier;
2015. p. 184-207.
7. Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid
and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58(1):80-8.
8. Narasimhan K, Stuzin JM, Rohrich RJ. Five-step neck lift: integrating anatomy with
clinical practice to optimize results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):339-50.
9. Pelle-Ceravolo M, Angelini M, Silvi E. Complete Platysma Transection in Neck Rejuvenation:
A Critical Appraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(4):781-91.
10. Pitanguy I, Ramos H, Garcia LC. Filosofia, técnica e complicações das ritidectomias
através da observação e análise de 2600 casos pessoais consecutivos. Rev Bras Cir.
1972;62:277-86.
11. Baker TJ, Gordon HI. The temporal face lift (“mini-lift”). Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;47(4):313-5.
12. Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(1):53-61.
13. Ramirez OM. The subperiosteal rhytidectomy: the third-generation face-lift. Ann Plast
Surg. 1992;28(3):218-32.
14. Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(1):1-13.
15. Connell BF, Marten TJ. Surgical correction of the crow’s feet deformity. Clin Plast
Surg. 1993;20(2):295-302.
16. Castro CC, Aboudib JHC, Giaquinto MGC, Moreira MBL. Avaliação sobre resultados tardios
em ritidoplastia. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2005;20(2):124-6.
17. Bozola AR, Vieira R. Ritidoplastia setorial temporal - incisão marginal intracapilar
tração do músculo orbicular e blefaroplastia. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2013;28(4):557-62.
18. Viterbo F. New treatment for crow’s feet wrinkles by vertical myectomy of the lateral
orbicularis oculi. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(1):275-9.
19. Cabbabe SW, Andrades P, Vasconez LO. Lateral orbicularis oculi muscle plasty in conjunction
with face lifting for periorbital rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(4):1285-93.
20. Aston SJ. Orbicularis oculi muscle flaps: a technique to reduce crows feet and lateral
canthal skin folds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;65(2):206-16.
21. de Assis Montenegro Cido Carvalho F, Vieira da Silva V Jr, Moreira AA, Viana FO. Definitive
treatment for crow’s feet wrinkles by total myectomy of the lateral Orbicularis Oculi.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32(5):779-82.
22. Furnas DW. The orbicularis oculi muscle. Management in blepharoplasty. Clin Plast
Surg. 1981;8(4):687-715.
1. Fibonacci Cirurgia Plástica, Plastic Surgery, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
2. Hospital Felício Rocho, Plastic Surgery, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Ticiano Cesar Teixeira Cló, Rua República Argentina, 507, Bairro Sion, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Zip Code
30315-490, E-mail: ticianoclo@gmail.com
Article received: March 19, 2021.
Article accepted: October 28, 2021.
Conflicts of interest: none.