INTRODUCTION
According to the National Cancer Institute, breast cancer is the most common type
of malignancy among women in Brazil and worldwide, excluding non-melanoma skin
neoplasms, with 1.2 million new cases diagnosed annually, totaling 15% of all
cancer deaths in women1-3. In Brazil, this percentage is
29%, and for the year 2020, 66,280 new breast cancer cases are
expected1,3-6.
Despite prevention campaigns, locally advanced breast cancer, not being the
majority of cases, can cover up to 50% of cases7. Due to its severity, the initial therapeutic
approach has been using neoadjuvant chemotherapy for possible primary reduction
of the lesion and subsequent surgical treatment. In resistant cases, mastectomy
becomes the treatment of choice, including axillary emptying and large skin
resections, leading to important chest wall defects7.
The thoracoepigastric flap has been an important surgical tool for such cases,
with an excellent prognosis and low rate of complications3.
The case of a patient with locally advanced breast cancer, associated with
extensive involvement of the skin and pectoral muscles, with a large defect of
the chest wall after surgical removal of the tumor is described, and the
thoracoepigastric flap technique was used for complete closure of the
region.
CASE REPORT
R.A.S., female, 53 years old, from Regent Feijó/SP, with no family history
of breast cancer, sought her municipality’s health center, stating that
six months ago, she noticed a nodule in her right breast during the
self-examination. She was referred to the Mastology outpatient clinic of the
Regional Hospital of Presidente Prudente, presenting, on physical examination, a
voluminous tumor occupying the entire length of the right breast, measuring
approximately 20cm in diameter, fixed to the deep planes, invading the skin,
providing ulceration and destruction of the nipple-areolar complex. Biopsy
showed infiltrating mixed carcinoma (lobular component with discrete areas of
non-special ductal carcinoma).
The patient underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment with four
cyclophosphamide doxorubicin cycles, followed by 12 paclitaxel cycles, without
the lesion’s clinical regression.
She was referred for surgical treatment, in which a mastectomy was performed with
subsequent closure of the chest wall defect using thoracoepigastric flap. The
technique involved the following steps: a) with the patient in a supine
position, surgical marking of the area to be resected and the flap was performed
(Figure 1); b) a wide resection of the
tumor area was carried out, including breast, pectoral musculature and adjacent
cutaneous tissue, with subsequent axillary emptying; c) making the flap by
detaching it from the abdominal wall, keeping it pedicled in the epigastric
region (Figure 2); c) rotation and fixation
of the flap in the defective area (Figure 3); d) approximation and synthesis of local flaps with complete closure
of the thoracic defect (Figure 4).
The patient progressed favorably with good flap perfusion, without areas of
necrosis or infection. The surgical specimen’s anatomopathological
analysis confirmed the diagnosis of mixed carcinoma measuring 16x14cm of high
degree. It was observed that the tumor mass invaded the pectoral muscle and with
great involvement of the skin and papilla.
DISCUSSION
Locally advanced breast tumors are defined as a neoplasm that compromises the
breast in all, or almost all of its extension, tumors that compromise four or
more axillary lymph nodes, or those with metastases in ipsilateral
supraclavicular lymph nodes4,7.
Figure 1 - Skin marking of the thoracic-epigastric flap
Figure 1 - Skin marking of the thoracic-epigastric flap
Figure 3 - Flap rotated and fixed in the defective area
Figure 3 - Flap rotated and fixed in the defective area
Figure 4 - Closure of the chest defect
Figure 4 - Closure of the chest defect
According to Ho et al., in 20168, its treatment should include
loco-regional disease control and eradicating occult systemic metastases. In the
case of voluminous tumors requiring extensive skin losses, impossible to be
reparated with primary closure, several studies highlight the importance of
using oncoplastic techniques2,4,5,7-9. There is no established consensus on the best
approach to be defined according to the surgeon’s experience and
preference and the quality of tissue adjacent to the breast and intraoperative
factors of the patient3-5,7.
The flaps appeared in 1886, with Tansini, and among the existing options, stand
out the large dorsal muscle, the transverse flap of the rectus abdominal muscle
(TRAM) or vertical flap rectus abdominal muscle (VRAM), the thoracoepigastric or
thoracoabdominal flap and skin grafts2-5,7,10.
The use of the thoracoepigastric flap has been described as a reliable tool
because it is characterized as a technique that is easy to perform, safe and
with minimal post-surgical complications, highlighting the cases in which it is
desired that the radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatment should not be
delayed5,7. Initially described in 1974 by
Bohmert e Cronin, in 198011,
this method allows the coverage of extensive defective areas of the breast, in
lower or lateral thoracic regions, in addition to sternal defects, without the
need for other flaps or skin grafts11,12. Park et al.,
in 200613, described a series of 24 cases in which the closure of a
large compromised area after mastectomy was performed with thoracoepigastric
fasciocutaneous flaps, which were safe with 36% of small complications, possible
to be recovered with conservative treatment, in a14-month follow-up13. Davis et al., in
197714, describe16 other cases with the use of the
thoracoepigastric flap, which did not present complications, so they are shown
to be very safe and effective techniques14.
The thoracoepigastric flap derives from a richly vascularized region with
superficial segmental blood supply of perforating arteries, which allows the
manufacture of long resistant and safe fragments4,6. They
are designed as transposition flaps, and the determination of length remains
uncertain6. Davis et
al., in 197714, reported the largest flap size being
35x15cm2. In this case, we used a fabric fraction of 15x8cm,
ensuring the necessary coverage of the existing defect14.
There are numerous advantages described in the use of thoracoepigastric flaps,
such as shorter surgical time compared to other techniques, less blood loss and
less postoperative hospital stay4. According to Deo et al., in 200315, patients who
underwent musculocutaneous reconstructions demonstrated increased morbidity,
blood loss in the abdominal wall and prolonged hospital stay compared to
thoracoabdominal reconstructions15,16.
CONCLUSION
It is concluded that this technique is extremely useful, innovative and easily
executable. The use of thoracoepigastric flap represents an important tool in
closing chest wall defects, with satisfactory results.
REFERENCES
1. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Instituto Nacional de
Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). Estimativa 2018:
incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério
da Saúde/INCA; 2017.
2. Cosac OM, Camara Filho JPP, Cammarota MC, Di Lamartine J, Daher JC,
Borgatto MS, et al. Reconstrução mamária de resgate: a
importância dos retalhos miocutâneos. Rev Bras Cir Plást.
2013;28(1):92-9.
3. Fitoussi AD, Berry MG, Famà F, Falcou MC, Curnier A,
Couturaud B, et al. Oncoplastic breast surgery for cancer: analysis of 540
consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Fev;125(2):454-2.
4. Saldanha OR, Urdaneta FV, Llaverias F, Saldanha Filho OR, Saldanha
CB. Reconstrução de mama com retalho excedente de abdominoplastia
reversa. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2014;29(2):297-302.
5. Pinto EBS, Muniz AC, Erazo PI, Abdalla PCSP.
Reconstrução mamária: princípios geométricos
dos retalhos cutâneos em duplo V. Rev Bras Cir Plást.
1998;13(3):19-42.
6. Pires DM, Souza GJ, Pace B. Utilização do retalho
tóraco-epigástrico em grandes ressecções da mama:
relato de caso de tumor filóide. Mastology (Impr.). 2018
Dez;28(4):231-5.
7. Burattini ACB, Piteri RCO, Ferreira LF, Silveira Junior VF, Broetto
J, Richter CA, et al. Segurança e viabilidade de um novo formato de
retalho toracoepigástrico na reconstrução da parede
torácica em câncer de mama localmente avançado: um estudo
transversal. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2016;31(1):2-11.
8. Ho W, Stallard S, Doughty J, Mallon E, Romics L. Oncological
outcomes and complications after volume replacement oncoplastic breast
conservations—the Glasgow experience. Breast Cancer (Auckl).
2016;10:223-8.
9. Cammarota MC, Campos AC, Faria CADC, Santos GC, Barcelos LDP, Dias
RCS, et al. Qualidade de vida e resultado estético após
mastectomia e reconstrução mamária. Rev Bras Cir
Plást. 2019;34(1):45-57.
10. Marcondes CA, Pessoa SGP, Pessoa BBGP, Dias IS, Ribeiro NP.
Estratégias em reconstruções de tórax pós
ressecções extensas de tumores de mama localmente
avançados: uma série de 11 casos. Rev Bras Cir Plást.
2015;30(13):339-44.
11. Bohmert H. Experience in breast reconstruction with
thoraco-epigastric and advancement flaps. Acta Chir Belg.
1980;79(2):105-10.
12. Cronin TD, Upton J, McDonough JM. Reconstruction of the breast after
mastectomy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1977; 59:1
13. PARK P. et al. Extended cutaneous ‘thoracoabdominal’
flap for large chest wall reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg.
2006;57(2):177-83.
14. Davis WM. et al. Use of a direct, transverse, thoracoabdominal flap
to close difficult wounds of the thorax and upper extremity. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 1977;60(4):526-33. PMID: 333484 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197710000-00005
15. Deo S. V. et al. Myocutaneous versus thoraco-abdominal flap cover
for soft tissue defects following surgery for locally advanced and recurrent
breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2003;83:31-35.
16. Silva MMA, Sabino Neto M, Leite AT, Guimarães PAP, Ferreira
LM. Reconstrução de parede torácica em extensas
ressecções oncológicas. Rev Bras Cir Plást.
2017;32(4):513-22.
1. Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Faculdade de
Medicina de Presidente Prudente, Presidente Prudente, SP,
Brazil.
Corresponding author: Rafaela Alias
Horta, Rua Rio Grande do Sul, 244, Vila Marcondes, Presidente
Prudente, SP, Brazil., Zip Code: 19030-130, E-mail:
aliasrafaela@gmail.com
Article received: July 17, 2020.
Article accepted: January 10, 2021.
Conflicts of interest: none
Institution: Universidade do Oeste Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina de
Presidente Prudente, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil.