INTRODUCTION
Palate development occurs between the fifth and twelfth weeks of embryonic life, with
the most critical period occurring between the sixth and ninth weeks. Cleft lip and
palate (CLP) occur due to the non-fusion of the maxillary and nasomedial processes
during the embryonic period1.
Among craniofacial malformations, CLP are the most common. In a large study conducted
in several Latin American countries, the prevalence of this malformation was 0.87
per thousand births when the cleft lip is evaluated with or without the palate’s involvement
and 0.13 per thousand births when exclusively cleft palate is evaluated2.
Several etiological factors are related to CLP, including genetic, environmental factors,
and exposure to teratogens. Thus, malformations are essentially multifactorial and
not yet fully defined1. CLP are generally classified according to the shape and extent of the structures
involved. One of the most commonly used classifications is the Spina classification,
which is based on the incisive foramen3. According to the degree of involvement, this classification is subdivided into complete
and incomplete, uni, or bilateral.
OBJECTIVE
Thus, this study’s objective was to verify the prevalence, in a specialized care center,
of the different morphological varieties of CLP based on the Spina classification,
in addition to classifying them by the details of the affected structures.
METHODS
It is an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study based on a review of
medical records of individuals born between 1989 and 2014 and followed up at a tertiary
medical center specialized in treating craniofacial malformations and located in the
south of Brazil. The institutional ethics committee approved the research under number
1,779,572 in 2016. The variables analyzed were the patient’s gender and the type of
cleft, based on Spina’s model. The fissures were divided into (with due variations
in laterality, right, left, or median): incomplete unilateral pre-foramen fissure,
incomplete bilateral pre-foramen fissure, complete unilateral pre-foramen fissure,
complete bilateral pre-foramen fissure, unilateral trans-foramen fissure, bilateral
trans-foramen fissure, incomplete post-foramen fissure, complete post-foramen fissure,
rare fissure. Besides, details on the involvement of the lip, dental arch, nasal filter,
soft palate, and/or hard palate and uvula were also collected. The information collected
was tabulated in Excel spreadsheets and submitted to statistical analysis. Pearson’s
chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to assessing possible correlations between
variables. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social
Science (SPSS) program. The level of significance considered was 0.05.
RESULTS
There were found 1,151 cases registered at the medical center between 1989 and 2014.
The medical records of individuals with other types of facial malformations were excluded
and those with incomplete or missing information, in a total of 73. Thus, the final
sample was 1,078 individuals.
Regarding the sex of registered cases, male patients are more common (585 - 54.3%)
than female patients (493 - 45.7%) (p = 0.005). The cleft with the greatest presence
in females was the post-foramen type with 180 cases (16.7%), unlike the male sex,
which had a greater number of patients with cleft foramen with 272 cases (25.2%) (Table 1).
Table 1 - Absolute frequency (N) and proportion, in percentage, of cleft lip and/or palate location
found concerning sex.
Fissure type |
Female |
Male |
Total |
N |
% |
N |
% |
N |
% |
Post-foramen |
180 |
16.7 |
132 |
12.2 |
312 |
28.9 |
Pre-foramen |
146 |
13.5 |
181 |
16.8 |
327 |
30.3 |
Trans-foramen |
167 |
15.5 |
272 |
25.2 |
439 |
40.7 |
Total |
493 |
45.7 |
585 |
54.3 |
1078 |
100 |
Table 1 - Absolute frequency (N) and proportion, in percentage, of cleft lip and/or palate location
found concerning sex.
Comparing the clefts as to their unilateral or bilateral presence, in those that can
be classified as such, that is, disregarding the post-foramen clefts, it was observed
that, of a total of 766 cases, 591 (77.2%) are unilateral and 175 (22.8%) are bilateral,
regardless of gender, approximately three times more prevalent than unilateral than
bilateral.
Unilateral clefts can occur on the right or left side. The distribution of unilateral
clefts located on the left was 368 (62.2%), greater than on the right with 222 (37.5%)
cases. One (0.2%) patient with a rare median fissure was identified.
In the division into complete or incomplete, taking into account that the trans-foramen
clefts are always classified as complete, the post-foramen cleft with the highest
prevalence was incomplete in 257 patients (23.8%), whereas in the pre-foramen the
cleft type more appeared in 139 patients (12.9%) (Table 2).
Table 2 - Frequency of complete or incomplete forms compared between pre-, post- and trans-foramen
clefts, in number (N) and percentage.
Fissure type |
Complete |
Incomplete |
Total |
N |
% |
N |
% |
N |
% |
Post-foramen |
55 |
5.1 |
257 |
23.8 |
312 |
28.9 |
Pre-foramen |
139 |
12.9 |
188 |
17.4 |
327 |
30.3 |
Trans-foramen |
439 |
40.7 |
0 |
0 |
439 |
40.7 |
Total |
633 |
58.7 |
445 |
41.3 |
1078 |
100 |
Table 2 - Frequency of complete or incomplete forms compared between pre-, post- and trans-foramen
clefts, in number (N) and percentage.
The most prevalent cleft in the general sample was unilateral trans-foramen with 307
individuals (28.5%) followed by incomplete post-foramen with 257 (23.8%). Rare fissures
(n = 2) included alveolar fissures (n = 1) and Epignathus (median, n = 1) (Table 3).
Table 3 - Frequency in number (N) and percentage (%) of the types of clefts.
Fissure type |
N |
% |
Unilateral trans-foramen |
307 |
28.5 |
Incomplete post-foramen |
257 |
23.8 |
Incomplete unilateral pre-foramen |
160 |
14.8 |
Bilateral trans-foramen |
131 |
12.2 |
Complete unilateral pre-foramen |
123 |
11.4 |
Complete post-foramen |
55 |
5.1 |
Incomplete bilateral pre-foramen |
27 |
2.5 |
Complete bilateral pre-foramen |
16 |
1.5 |
Rare |
2 |
0.2 |
Total |
1078 |
100.00 |
Table 3 - Frequency in number (N) and percentage (%) of the types of clefts.
When considering the anatomical structures that may be involved in the different types
of fissures, the following aspects were established: to be characterized as a complete
fissure, and it must be present in all the anatomical structures that may be involved;
that is, the pre-foramen is complete when it affects the lip, dental arch up to the
incisor foramen (12.9% of patients in the sample) and the post-foramen fissure affects
from the incisor foramen to the end of the soft palate, in addition to the uvula (5.1%
).
As for the malformation location in incomplete type fissures, the same structures
are used, appearing partially or in isolation, as can be seen in Table 3. Among the affected anatomical references, one can perceive a predominance of exclusively
lip involvement in 167 patients with an incomplete pre-foramen cleft. In 24 patients,
only a red line was observed in the nasal filter together with the lip, called scar
cleft. This scar can occur combined with cleft lip (2 cases in the sample) and other
types of cleft, such as incomplete post-foramen (1 patient). When post-foramen was
considered, there was a prevalence of isolated involvement of the soft palate (129
cases) followed by the hard palate partially associated with the soft palate (89 cases).
Submucosal clefts appeared in 12 patients with post-foramen cleft and two patients
with trans-foramen cleft without association with other soft tissues, and in 1 patient
with an associated cleft lip. In the trans-foramen clefts, fissures were observed
that affected all structures, from the lip to the soft palate’s limits, having been
observed in 368 patients (Table 4).
Table 4 - Frequency in number regarding the location of the cleft related to the anatomical
structures involved (in cases of incomplete clefts)
Specified location |
Post |
Pre |
Trans |
Total |
Lip to soft palate |
|
|
368 |
368 |
Isolated lip |
|
167 |
25 |
192 |
Lip to incisive foramen |
|
139 |
|
139 |
Isolated soft palate |
129 |
|
4 |
133 |
Partial hard palate + soft palate |
89 |
|
8 |
97 |
Incisive foramen to the soft palate |
55 |
|
|
55 |
Partial soft palate |
22 |
|
1 |
23 |
Muscular plane (submucosa) |
12 |
|
2 |
14 |
Scar cleft |
|
16 |
8 |
24 |
Lip + dental arch |
|
2 |
10 |
12 |
Isolated uvula |
3 |
|
2 |
5 |
Hard palate + soft palate |
2 |
|
2 |
4 |
Scar fissure + lip + dental arch |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
Lip + partial hard palate + soft palate |
|
|
3 |
3 |
Epignathus |
|
|
1 |
1 |
Scar cleft + lip |
|
2 |
|
2 |
Lip + partial hard palate + soft palate |
|
|
1 |
1 |
Lip + soft palate |
|
|
2 |
2 |
Lip + muscle plane |
|
|
1 |
1 |
Total |
312 |
327 |
439 |
1078 |
Table 4 - Frequency in number regarding the location of the cleft related to the anatomical
structures involved (in cases of incomplete clefts)
DISCUSSION
In our study, a higher general occurrence of cleft lip and/or palate was found in
males (54.3%), following the literature that points to be a more common problem in
this sex2,4. However, still concerning sex, the female was, in absolute numbers, the most affected
when it comes to post-foramen clefts. The literature shows that females are the most
affected when it comes to cleft palate4,5. The female predominance in isolated cleft palates is attributed to the earlier horizontalization
of the palate in male embryos, which occurs after testicular differentiation. This
would leave female embryos exposed to environmental factors for longer6.
Regarding the type of cleft, we found trans-foramen cleft (n = 439, 40.7%) and approximate
values between post-foramen (n = 312, 28.9%) and pre-foramen (n = 327), 30.3%).
The higher prevalence of trans-foramen cleft is in agreement with another study that
used a similar classification7.
Regarding the clefts being unilateral or bilateral, not taking into account post-foramen
clefts and rare for not having these classifications, we observed in our results a
unilateral predominance in both sexes (77.2%). Regarding the side, there was a higher
prevalence on the left side (62.3%). This finding also follows the literature that
shows that unilateral cases are more common than bilateral and unilateral cases on
the left4,5.
The detailed description of all the structures affected by the fissure, besides the
traditional classification itself, brings, in our view, some significant benefits.
Details about the involvement of the lip, hard and/or soft palate, dental arch, uvula,
and nasal filter increase the amount of information about the case, being useful in
the record, especially in the surgical planning the execution of the procedure itself.
Since the etiology of CLP has not yet been fully elucidated and may be influenced
by factors such as genetics and environmental exposure, among others, data referring
to a medical center located in a given geographic area may also be of specific interest.
As far as our research went, this is one of the few publications referring to CLP
in our country’s southern region, an area of almost 30 million people, as projected
by the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística in 20188. Also, in this region-specific geographic area, this research presents the largest
number of patients affected.
As the main limitation of this study, we point out that only patients followed up
at the medical center were included; therefore, it is not a broader population study,
being indeed susceptible to unreported clinical cases, in addition to not being able
to present a general prevalence of cases in the geographical area involved.
CONCLUSION
The most prevalent type of cleft was unilateral trans-foramen. In the female gender,
the post-foramen cleft, and in the male, the transformation was the most frequent.
Unilateral fissures were more common than bilateral fissures and, when unilateral,
there was a predominance of lesions on the left. Regarding the anatomical details
of the structures involved, the most common injuries were those that involved from
the lip to the soft palate.
REFERENCES
1. Merritt L. Part 1. Understanding the embryology and genetics of cleft lip and palate.
Adv Neonat Care. 2005 Abr;5(2):64-71.
2. Menegotto BG, Salzano FM. Epidemiology of oral clefts in a large South American sample.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991 Out;28(4):373-6;discussion:376-7.
3. Spina V. A proposed modification for the classification of cleft lip and cleft palate.
Cleft Palate J. 1973 Jul;10:251-2.
4. Al Omari F, Al-Omari IK. Cleft lip and palate in Jordan: birth prevalence rate. Cleft
Palate Craniofac J. 2004 Nov;41(6):609-12.
5. Vanderas AP. Incidence of cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip and palate among
races: a review. Cleft Palate J. 1987 Jul;24(3):216-25.
6. Burdi AR, Silvey RG. Sexual differences in closure of the human palatal shelves. Cleft
Palate J. 1969 Jan;6:1-7.
7. Cymrot M, Sales FC, Teixeira FAA, Teixeira Junior FAA, Teixeira GSB, Cunha Filho JF,
et al. Prevalência dos tipos de fissura em pacientes com fissuras labiopalatinas atendidos
em um Hospital Pediátrico do Nordeste brasileiro. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2010 Dez;25(4):648-51.
8. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia Estatística (IBGE). Projeção da população do Brasil
e das Unidades da Federação [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): IBGE; 2019; [acesso em
2019 Apr 15]. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br/apps/populacao/projecao/
1. Federal University of the Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
2. Mackenzie Evangelical College of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
3. University Tuiuti of the Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Corresponding author: José Fernando Polanski, Rua General Carneiro, 181, SAM 19, Alto da Glória, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. Zip Code:
80060-900. E-mail: jfpolanski@gmail.com
Article received: April 15, 2020.
Article accepted: July 15, 2020.
Conflicts of interest: none