INTRODUCTION
Currently, with the increase in reducing gastroplasty or bariatric surgery, there
has also been an increase in the number of patients with large weight losses who are
looking for plastic surgery. One of the characteristics of these patients is the excess
of dermal adipose tissue, which represents a real challenge for the plastic surgeon.
Among the most common deformities, those that affect the lower limbs, especially the
trochanteric region, represent an important psychological disorder for the patient
and have a high degree of technical difficulty1,2,3.
Therefore, the correct indication of the different procedures, based on an assessment,
considering both the organic and the psychological aspects, is essential in the treatment
of these deformities3.
In 1964, Pitanguy described a technique with scars camouflaged in natural grooves,
which when understood and correctly indicated, offers very satisfactory results. With
the advent of liposuction, there was a reformulation of the possibilities of treatment
for trochanteric lipodystrophy, establishing new concepts, but not invalidating the
procedures previously used4,5.
Therefore, the objective was to report a case of trochanteric dermolipectomy in a
patient after bariatric surgery, where liposuction alone would not solve the correction
of the deformity.
CASE REPORT
Female patient, 55 years old, with a history of reducing gastroplasty (bariatric surgery)
in December 2013, her pre-bariatric BMI was 52.3 kg/m2 and had great weight loss (approximately 52 kg in 5 years). He reported significant
discomfort with lipodystrophy and extensive flaccidity in the bilateral trochanteric
region (Figure 1). After evaluation by the team, it was decided to perform bilateral trochanteric
dermolipectomy. The patient underwent the procedure indicated in January 2019 at the
Plastic Surgery Service Osvaldo Saldanha, in Santos/SP.
The criteria for surgery indication were: great weight loss after bariatric surgery
(approximately 52 kg in 5 years, BMI pre-trochanteric dermolipectomic surgery equal
to 31.8 kg/m2), excess skin and subcutaneous cell tissue (SSCT) in the bilateral trochanteric region
and the patient’s desire to perform the correction of lipodystrophy in the aforementioned
region.
Surgical technique
The excision areas are marked with the patient in an orthostatic position, prior to
anesthesia (Figure 2). Patient under general anesthesia, is placed in prone position on the operating
table. Asepsis, antisepsis and placement of sterile fields are performed. Incision
in previous mark. The incision corresponds approximately to the grooves formed by
the deformity due to lipodystrophy in the trochanteric region, starting at the junction
of these two grooves, proceeding towards the anterosuperior iliac crest, but not reaching
it. Once the skin incision is made, it is deepened until the muscular plane is reached,
making a bevel in the caudal direction. The flaps are dried up to the limit of the
defined area, with their total weight equal to 3kg and 200g. A continuous suction
drain is used on each resected side and closed by planes (Figure 3).
Figure 3 - Immediate postoperative
Figure 3 - Immediate postoperative
The patient had a good postoperative evolution, without complications such as seroma,
hematoma or suture dehiscence in the postoperative period (Figures 4 e 5).
Figure 4 - Preoperative, 20 days postoperatively, 1 month and 20 days postoperatively: anterior
and posterior views.
Figure 4 - Preoperative, 20 days postoperatively, 1 month and 20 days postoperatively: anterior
and posterior views.
Figure 5 - Preoperative, 20 days postoperatively, 1 month and 20 days postoperatively: bilateral
side view.
Figure 5 - Preoperative, 20 days postoperatively, 1 month and 20 days postoperatively: bilateral
side view.
DISCUSSION
Trochanteric lipodystrophy is attributed to several factors, hormonal and, mainly,
hereditary. There is also the adipocyte theory, which states that there is a fixed
number of adipocytes in the body containing two types of receptors sensitive to the
same chemical mediators of the adrenergic system. It has been shown that adipocytes
with alpha 2 receptors, in women, are located mainly in the trochanteric region, for
this reason there is no improvement in the deformity of this region, despite great
weight loss, being one of the most common complaints of patients, the fat deposit
in this region. These patients have a characteristic gynecoid body: the pelvis is
larger than the trunk, the breasts are small and the arms are thin. When these patients
go on a diet, exercise and try in other ways to reduce body measures, they can only
lose weight, but this disproportion remains and can even be accentuated3,4,5.
Therefore, due to these deformities, these patients look for plastic surgery, so that
they can minimize them. In trochanteric lipodystrophy, in cases of mild and moderate
deformities, the scar resulting from a dermolipectomy is undoubtedly one of the most
controversial points of the classic technique, in which the relationship between the
benefit and the resulting deformity would be unfavorable. Regarding less severe deformities,
there is currently the option of treatment by liposuction, which allows the correction
without visible scars, consequently limiting the indications for classic dermolipectomy,
with relatively apparent scars. On the other hand, liposuction used in a patient with
major deformities, may aggravate them even further, resulting in sequelae whose correction
needs to be performed using the trochanteric dermolipectomy technique3,4,6.
The analysis of the different procedures performed in the 90’s showed that liposuction
brought an indisputable benefit in cases of localized adiposity, limiting the indications
for the dermolipectomy technique, especially in the trochanteric region, without,
however, invalidating it for selected cases5,7,8.
In conclusion, as described in this case report, due to the presence of great adiposity
and flaccidity in the patient’s trochanteric region, the trochanteric dermolipectomy
technique was indicated, since liposuction alone would not be enough to correct the
patient’s complaints, which may further aggravate the deformity of the region in question.
REFERENCES
1. Regnault P, Baroudi R, Carvalho CGS. Correction of lower limb lipodystrophy. Aesthetic
Plast Surg. 1979 Dec;3:233-49.
2. Franco T. Aesthetic surgery of the upper and lower limbs. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1980
Dec;4(1):245-56.
3. Mazzarone F, Pitanguy I, Gabriele J, Nunes D, Vargas A. Dermolipectomia crural com
prolongamento médio-anterior no paciente pós-obesidade. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2005;20(3):142-7.
4. Pitanguy I, Correa WEM, Salgado F, Kauak L, Solinas R. Aspectos atuais da lipodistrofia
trocantérica e interfomoral. Rev Bras Cir. 1987;77(3):181-94.
5. Farina R, Baroudi R, Golcman B, Castro O. Riding-trousers-like type of pelvicrural
lipodystrophy (trochanteric lipomatosis). Br J Plast Surg. 1960;13:174-8.
6. Shaer WD. Gluteal and thigh reduction: reclassification, critical review, and improved
technique for primary correction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1984;8(3):165-72.
7. Pitanguy, I. Trochanteric lipodystrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1964 Sep;34:280-6.
8. Pitanguy, I. Upper extremity: dermolipectomy. In: Pitanguy I, ed. Aesthetic surgery
of head and body. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1984. p. 153-8.
1. Serviço de Cirurgia Plástica Osvaldo Saldanha, Santos, SP, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Mariana Fernandes Avenida Osvaldo Reis, 3281, 13º andar, Salas 1310/1311, Praia Brava, Itajaí, SC,
Brazil. Zip Code: 88007-001 E-mail: dramarianacp@gmail.com
Article received: March 18, 2019.
Article accepted: July 08, 2019.
Conflicts of interest: none.