INTRODUCTION
According to the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA)
classification, vascular anomalies (VAs) are categorized into the following two main
groups: tumors and malformations. Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common vascular
tumor, while congenital malformations are defined according to the presence of a venous,
lymphatic, arteriovenous, and capillary component or the combination thereof1-5. For the past years, the consensus on the terminology and classification of these
lesions was unclear, with negative clinical outcomes on the therapeutic strategies
performed, which were often applied in a heterogeneous and nonparameterized manner,
increasing the iatrogenic effects of these lesions. After the standardization of the
ISSVA, different treatment options were compared, and each etiological diagnosis was
associated with a gold standard procedure. The diagnosis of a VA is essentially clinical
and is based on anamnesis and careful physical examination. Radiological examinations
are required in selected situations3,6.
VAs are the most common congenital abnormalities of the soft tissues, affecting up
to 10% of newborns. They are observed in any region of the body, but are more common
in the head and neck than in the extremities. The lips are the body region most frequently
affected by VAs 5,7,8. Considering their central position on the face, they are particularly visible, which
creates a significant esthetic stigma, which tends to worsen as the patient grows.
Additionally, VAs can potentially involve the oral muscles, resulting in functional
problems, such as improper speech, oral incontinence, and impairment in facial mimicry5,7,9.
The pattern of involvement in the lip can be related to the etiology of the lesion,
but only few studies have been conducted confirming this hypothesis7,10,11. Based on a large number of cases, this study aims at evaluating this association,
contributing to a better diagnosis and management of patients with VAs of the lips.
METHODS
This was a case series conducted between 1997 and 2017 in a single Vascular Anomalies
Service in São Paulo, Brazil. The present study was approved by the institutional
ethics committee (protocol number 1.630.646), and patients’ parents or guardians provided
informed consent for inclusion in the study.
A total of 150 patients with VAs of the lips were included and evaluated by photographic
analysis. Based on the ISSVA 2018 classification, the etiological diagnosis was defined
by clinical evaluation, complementary tests, and biopsies, as needed. The following
data were collected: type of VA, age, sex, lip involved (top/bottom/both), involvement
of the labial commissure (central, lateral, central side, whole), extension (25% to
100%), involvement beyond the vermillion, and distortion of the lips (Figure 1). To compare the prevalence of IH, patients were divided by age into the following
two groups: patients aged less than 7 years and patients aged greater than 7 years.
An anatomical mapping of the lesions was performed, and the association between the
lesions and the etiological diagnosis was assessed. The individual values were established
to create heat maps for better visualization. Warmer colors represented the areas
of higher incidence of the vascular anomaly represented.
Figure 1 - Anatomical landmarks of the lips
Figure 1 - Anatomical landmarks of the lips
The data were grouped using MS Office 2013 and analyzed using the Statistical Package
International Business Machines Corporation Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
version 2–3.0. The likelihood ratio test was used, with a significance level of 5%
(0.050).
RESULTS
A total of 150 patients (95, women; 55, men) were included in the study. Of these,
76 were diagnosed with IH, 35 with venous and venous-lymphatic malformations (VMs),
20 with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), 16 with capillary malformations (CMs),
and 3 with simple lymphatic malformations (LMs). A female predominance was related
to a higher prevalence of IH (60% of 95 patients, female to male ratio = 1.7:1). Other
vascular tumors in addition to IH were not observed. The results are shown in Table 1 and summarized in Figure 2.
Table 1 - Anatomical patterns of vascular anomalies of the lips.
Affected lip |
IH |
VM |
AVM |
CM |
LM |
Total |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
Upper |
38 |
46.91 |
23 |
28.40 |
13 |
16.05 |
4 |
4.94 |
3 |
3.70 |
81 |
Lower |
38 |
55.88 |
12 |
17.65 |
7 |
10.29 |
11 |
16.18 |
0 |
0.00 |
68 |
Both |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
1 |
100.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
1 |
Total |
76 |
50.67 |
35 |
23.33 |
20 |
13.33 |
16 |
10.67 |
3 |
2.00 |
150 |
Location |
IH |
VM |
AVM |
CM |
LM |
Total |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
Central |
25 |
83.33 |
5 |
16.67 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
30 |
Lateral |
16 |
45.71 |
13 |
37.14 |
6 |
17.14 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
35 |
C+L |
26 |
42.62 |
17 |
27.87 |
13 |
21.31 |
4 |
6.56 |
1 |
1.64 |
61 |
Whole |
9 |
37.50 |
0 |
0.00 |
1 |
4.17 |
12 |
50.00 |
2 |
8.33 |
24 |
Total |
76 |
50.67 |
35 |
23.33 |
20 |
13.33 |
16 |
10.67 |
3 |
2.00 |
150 |
Involvement of the labial commissure
|
IH |
VM |
AVM |
CM |
LM |
Total |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
Yes |
7 |
15.91 |
13 |
29.55 |
9 |
20.45 |
15 |
34.09 |
0 |
0.00 |
44 |
No |
69 |
65.09 |
22 |
20.75 |
11 |
10.38 |
1 |
0.94 |
3 |
2.83 |
106 |
Total |
76 |
50.67 |
35 |
23.33 |
20 |
13.33 |
16 |
10.67 |
3 |
2.00 |
150 |
Extension |
IH |
VM |
AVM |
CM |
LM |
Total |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
< 25% |
31 |
63.27 |
13 |
26.53 |
5 |
10.20 |
0 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
49 |
25%-50% |
27 |
56.25 |
10 |
20.83 |
8 |
16.67 |
3 |
6.25 |
0 |
0.00 |
48 |
> 75% |
9 |
31.03 |
12 |
41.38 |
6 |
20.69 |
1 |
3.45 |
1 |
3.45 |
29 |
100% |
9 |
37.50 |
0 |
0.00 |
1 |
4.17 |
12 |
50.00 |
2 |
8.33 |
24 |
Total |
76 |
50.67 |
35 |
23.33 |
20 |
13.33 |
16 |
10.67 |
3 |
2.00 |
150 |
Involvement of the skin
|
IH |
VM |
AVM |
CM |
LM |
Total |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
Yes |
53 |
51.46 |
19 |
18.45 |
15 |
14.56 |
15 |
14.56 |
1 |
0.97 |
103 |
No |
23 |
48.94 |
16 |
34.04 |
5 |
10.64 |
1 |
2.13 |
2 |
4.26 |
47 |
Total |
76 |
50.67 |
35 |
23.33 |
20 |
13.33 |
16 |
10.67 |
3 |
2.00 |
150 |
Distortion |
IH |
VM |
AVM |
CM |
LM |
Total |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
% |
Freq. |
Yes |
62 |
48.44 |
32 |
25.00 |
19 |
14.84 |
12 |
9.38 |
3 |
2.34 |
128 |
No |
14 |
63.64 |
3 |
13.64 |
1 |
4.55 |
4 |
18.18 |
0 |
0.00 |
22 |
Total |
76 |
50.67 |
35 |
23.33 |
20 |
13.33 |
16 |
10.67 |
3 |
2.00 |
150 |
Table 1 - Anatomical patterns of vascular anomalies of the lips.
Figure 2 - Summary of anatomical pattern of involvement of vascular malformations
Figure 2 - Summary of anatomical pattern of involvement of vascular malformations
Regarding the distribution per age group, 82 patients (54%) were younger than 7 years.
Within this subgroup, 79% of the patients were diagnosed with IH. Vascular malformations
were more prevalent in patients aged greater than 7 years (71.4% of VMs, 85% of AVMs,
and 87.5% of CMs).
VAs were observed in both lips, but they were slightly more frequent in the upper
lip (54%) than in the lower lip. The majority of patients (64.6%) presented with involvement
of up to 50% extension of the lip. The most commonly affected was the center-lateral
portion (40.6%), followed by the involvement of the lateral portion of the lip alone
(23.3%). The involvement of the commissure was observed in 29.33% of patients. The
involvement of the skin, that is, beyond the vermillion, was observed in 68.6% of
patients. A distortion of the lip was observed in 85.33% of patients.
Considering only the group of vascular tumors, 85% of the patients were aged younger
than 7 years. The pattern of involvement for IH was of only one lip, equally distributed
between the upper and lower lip. The majority of the deformities caused lip distortion
and extension beyond the vermillion. Some differences were observed between the upper
and lower lip: in the upper lip, the lesions were often smaller and more centrally
located compared to the lower lip, while the lower lip showed a higher degree of heterogeneity
than the upper lip. Older patients were diagnosed with IH in the involuted phase.
The pattern of involvement of IH is presented in Table 1 and summarized in Figure 3.
Figure 3 - Pattern of involvement of infantile hemangiomas.
Figure 3 - Pattern of involvement of infantile hemangiomas.
Different patterns were observed for each specific etiology of vascular malformations.
Most patients were aged older than 7 years (77%). VMs were predominantly observed
in the upper lip and were located more laterally. An impairment of 25% to 75% due
to lip extension was observed, with significant deformity of its structure. Almost
half of the patients had malformations that extended beyond the edges of the vermilion.
Table 1 presents the data, and Figure 4 summarizes the pattern of involvement of VMs.
Figure 4 - Pattern of involvement of venous and venous-lymphatic malformations.
Figure 4 - Pattern of involvement of venous and venous-lymphatic malformations.
The AVMs were slightly more frequent in the upper lip than in the lower lip. The center-lateral
portion of the lip was affected in the majority of patients, from 25% to 75% of their
extension. A frequent involvement of the labial commissure and lip distortion were
observed. The majority of the AVMs extended beyond the limit of the vermilion. The
anatomical pattern is described in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 5.
Figure 5 - Pattern of involvement of arteriovenous malformations.
Figure 5 - Pattern of involvement of arteriovenous malformations.
CMs predominantly affected the lower lip. All patients had full involvement of the
lip, and 75% of the patients presented volume distortion (Figure 6). LMs involving the upper lip were observed in only three patients, with almost full
extension and large distortion.
Figure 6 - Pattern of involvement of capillary malformations.
Figure 6 - Pattern of involvement of capillary malformations.
Some statistically significant differences were observed when comparing the tumors
to the vascular malformations. The IHs were located more centrally (p=0.001), with rare involvement of the labial commissure (p=0.001), and were smaller than the vascular malformations (p=0.02). These results are shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7 - Comparison between infantile hemangiomas versus vascular malformations.
Figure 7 - Comparison between infantile hemangiomas versus vascular malformations.
DISCUSSION
More than two-thirds of VAs are found in the head and neck region. When one considers
the lips as a single unit, this region of the body has the highest prevalence of VAs5,7. A proper diagnosis is crucial for the proper management of patients to minimize
the esthetic and functional impairment caused by VAs5,6,7. In clinical practice, treatment of VAs is often performed by nonspecialists. Consequently,
any medical tool that assists in the differential diagnosis will allow for a faster
referral to specialized healthcare professionals, resulting in a better management
for patients with VAs.
The anatomical location may assist in the definition of the etiology of a VA. The
treatment of VAs differs considerably in accordance with the established diagnosis.
If an expectant management is preferred in vascular tumors such as IH, insufficient
treatment of vascular malformations allows its expansion, deforming the location and
resulting in a remarkable increase in the difficulty of treatment12,13,14. Currently, pharmacological treatment is particularly important in the treatment
of VAs, and the therapeutic choice is specific for each etiology15.
The surgical resection of VA of the lips can be one treatment option. The anatomical
site is crucial when planning the procedure. Reconstruction after the resection aims
at correcting contour deformities, rebuilding the labial commissure, and restoring
the competence of the lips. The type of resection (complete or partial) and the prospect
of recurrence of the lesion also depend on the etiological type of lesion13.
This study revealed the anatomical pattern of involvement of the VAs of the lips and,
more intensively, its association with the etiological diagnosis (Figure 2). The initial presentation of VAs often comprises minimal changes; hence, establishing
an assertive diagnosis is considered difficult. Accordingly, the anatomical pattern
of involvement is considered beneficial, specifically in mixed malformations where
a profound component of the lesion can be neglected. Thus, the combination of clinical
characteristics and anatomical location potentially reduces the diagnostic error and
results in better treatment 14,15.
The use of images to summarize clinical concepts is gradually accepted in modern medicine.
Heat maps are often used to represent complex statistical data. In this study, they
were used to reveal the complex distribution of VAs in a concise and practical manner16.
Although there are some limitations in this study, such as the retrospective pattern
of data collection, an anatomical pattern of distribution can be identified. The main
goal was achieved and is expected to minimize the diagnostic error, with a rapid referral
of the patient to an appropriate treatment.
CONCLUSION
Anatomical patterns of involvement of the lips were identified for each vascular anomaly.
Thus, a tool was created to assist in the diagnosis of patients and to provide better
therapeutic management.
COLLABORATIONS
RFZ
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, Conception and design study, Data Curation, Final
manuscript approval, Formal Analysis, Project Administration, Writing - Review & Editing
|
DCG
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, Conception and design study, Final manuscript
approval, Project Administration, Supervision, Writing - Original Draft Preparation,
Writing - Review & Editing
|
AK
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, Conception and design study, Data Curation, Final
manuscript approval, Realization of operations and/or trials
|
EMC
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, Conception and design study, Data Curation, Final
manuscript approval
|
RG
|
Final manuscript approval, Supervision, Writing - Review & Editing
|
REFERENCES
1. Corrêa PH, Nunes LCC, Johann ACBR, Aguiar MCF de, Gomez RS, Mesquita RA. Prevalence
of oral hemangioma, vascular malformation and varix in a Brazilian population. Braz
Oral Res. 2007;21(1):40-5.
2. Mulliken JB Glowacki J. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations in infants and children:
a classification based on endothelial characteristics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;69(3):412-22.
3. Goldenberg DC, Hiraki PY, Marques TM, Koga A, Gemperli R. Surgical treatment of facial
infantile hemangiomas: an analysis based on tumor characteristics and outcomes. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(4):1221-31.
4. International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA). Classification
for vascular anomalies - overview table. In: 20th ISSVA Congress Workshop; 2014 apr
1-4; Melbourne, Austrália. Melbourne, Austrália: ISSVA; 2014. Available from: http://www.issva.org/UserFiles/file/Classifications-2014-Final.pdf
5. Sohail M, Bashir MM, Ansari HH, Khan FA, Assumame N, Awan NU, et al. Outcome of management
of vascular malformations of lip. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(6):e520-4.
6. Jackson IT, Carreño R, Potparic Z, Hussain K. Hemangiomas, vascular malformations,
and lymphovenous malformations: classification and methods of treatment. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 1993;91(7):126-30.
7. Ryu JY, Lee JS, Lee JW, Choi KY, Yang JD, Cho BC, et al. Clinical approaches to vascular
anomalies of the lip. Arch Plast Surg. 2015;42(6):709-15.
8. Jafarian M, Dehghani N, Shams S, Esmaeelinejad M, Aghdashi F. Comprehensive treatment
of upper lip arteriovenous malformation. J Maxillofac Oral Surg [Internet]. 2016;
15(3):394-9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752213
9. Yanes DA, Pearson GD, Witman PM. Infantile hemangiomas of the lip: patterns, outcomes,
and implications. Pediatr Dermatol. 2016;33(5):511-7.
10. Low DW. Management of adult facial vascular anomalies. Facial Plast Surg. 2003;19(1):113-29.
11. Min-Jung TO, Scheuermann-Poley C, Tan M, Waner M. Distribution, clinical characteristics,
and surgical treatment of lip infantile hemangiomas. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(4):292-304.
12. Chiller KG, Passaro D, Frieden IJ. Hemangiomas of infancy. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(12):1567-76.
13. Hiraki PY, Goldenberg DC. Diagnóstico e tratamento do hemangioma infantil. Rev Bras
Cir Plást. 1983;25(2):388-97.
14. Van Doorne L, De Maeseneer M, Stricker C, Vanrensbergen R, Stricker M. Diagnosis and
treatment of vascular lesion of the lip. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;40(6):497-503.
15. Waner M, North PE, Scherer KA, Frieden IJ, Waner A, Mihm Junior MC, et al. The nonrandom
distribution of facial hemangiomas. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(7):869-75.
16. Wilkinson L, Michael F. The history of the cluster heat map. Am Stat. 2009;63(2):179-84.
1. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Dov Charles Goldenberg Rua Arminda, 93, Itaim Bibi, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Zip Code: 04538-100. E-mail:
drdov@terra.com.br
Article received: July 1, 2019.
Article accepted: October 21, 2019.
Conflicts of interest: none.