INTRODUCTION
Injuries caused by burns represent a significant public health problem and are the
fourth leading cause of childhood death in Brazil and the United States, behind only
other traumatic causes, such as traffic accidents, and homicides.1,2 According to the Brazilian Society of Burns, around 1 million burns occur per year
in Brazil. Of these, 100,000 patients will seek hospital care, and approximately 2,500
will die directly or indirectly from their burns.2,3
Due to musculoskeletal and immunological immaturity, children are more vulnerable
to death. It is estimated that approximately 70% of all deaths caused by burns at
this age could be avoided.1,4 This mortality rate is mainly due to infection and sepsis as well as systemic repercussions.1 After the destruction of the primary protective barrier, the thermal trauma leads
to the release of mediators, with extensive damage to capillary integrity and accelerated
loss of fluids, which may even lead to hypovolemic shock. Due to the disproportionate
body surface-to-weight ratio, these individuals more frequently present with systemic
repercussions.3,5
Furthermore, few diseases carry losses as devastating as burns. This type of lesion
results in considerable morbidity due to sequelae, with functional disability being
one of the most severe. This is especially true when the burn affects the hands, which
may result in unsightly deformities—especially of the face—and psychosocial disabilities.3,6
OBJECTIVE
Thus, the objective of this study was to outline the epidemiological profile of 0-18-year-old
children treated by the Plastic Surgery and Burns Service of the Evangelical University
Hospital of Curitiba.
METHODS
A cross-sectional and retrospective study was conducted by analyzing 625 hospitalization
records of children, aged 0-18, all of whom were victims of burns admitted to the
Plastic Surgery and Burns Service of the Evangelical University Hospital of Curitiba,
from January 2010 to December 2017. The Burns Service treats adults and children from
all over the state of Paraná, and other States, with greater demand from the city
of Curitiba and the metropolitan region. The study was approved by the Research Ethics
Committee of the Evangelical Charity Society of Curitiba, under opinion no. 86160718.4.0000.0103.
Information was collected on age, sex, length of hospitalization, death, body region
affected by burns, burned body surface area (BSA), depth of the burn, the etiological
agent involved, and therapeutic approach. The data regarding the causative agent of
burns were grouped as follows: chemical agent (burns caused by alkalis or acids);
thermal agent (burns caused by flammable agents, hot liquids, heated surface, embers,
and direct flame); and electrical agent (burns caused by electrical current).
The results are expressed as absolute numbers and percentages, in the form of tables
and graphs, which were processed using Microsoft Excel 2016.
RESULTS
We evaluated a total of 625 medical records of patients aged 1 month to 18 years of
age, over the last seven years. Of these, four (0.6%) died. A plurality of the sample
was composed of infants (43%), followed by preschoolers (36%), adolescents (11%),
and schoolchildren (10%). The mean age was 12.6 years. The most affected sex was male
(60%, n = 376), and the ratio between the sexes was 1.5:1. Concerning the time of
hospitalization, patients were hospitalized for 14.5 days on average, with a maximum
stay of 118 days. There was no significant difference in the time of hospitalization
among age groups (p = 0.61). There was also no significant difference between the
sexes (p = 0.83).
In this study, 98% (612) of the burns were caused by a thermal agent—74% by hot liquids—across
all age groups (Table 1). Most burns were second-degree (61.3%), followed by third-degree (38.2%), and first-degree
burns alone (0.5%).
Table 1 - Type of thermal burns by age class
|
Infant |
Pre-school Age |
School Age |
Adolescents |
Type |
N |
% |
N |
% |
N |
% |
N |
% |
Flammable agent |
4 |
2 |
24 |
11 |
17 |
27 |
11 |
17 |
Embers |
7 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Direct flame |
4 |
2 |
29 |
13 |
15 |
24 |
15 |
23 |
Hot liquid |
230 |
88 |
158 |
71 |
28 |
45 |
38 |
58 |
Hot surface |
17 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
Total |
262 |
100 |
222 |
100 |
62 |
100 |
66 |
100 |
Table 1 - Type of thermal burns by age class
Concerning BSA, 553 patients had 0%-25% BSA, 69 patients had 26%-50% BSA, two patients
had 51%-75% BSA, and one patient had burns over >75% BSA (Graph 1). The most-affected body area was the trunk (55%), with second-degree burns in 60%
of patients with trunk-area burns. Patients with >25% BSA tended to be hospitalized
eight days longer than patients with up to 25% BSA (p = 0.0029).
Graph 1 - BSA intervals. Source: The authors (2018)
Graph 1 - BSA intervals. Source: The authors (2018)
Among the treatment modalities, 44% (272) of the patients needed surgical interventions
(debridement and grafting), and dressings were the most adopted treatment.
Third-degree thermal burns were mostly caused by hot liquids (38%), in both sexes,
and most children with third-degree thermal burns were preschoolers (39%). For burns
involving hot liquids (Table 2), dressings (65%) and debridement (85%) were the most common treatments, whereas
grafting alone was homogeneously distributed across the all types of third-degree
thermal burns (p = 0.001).
Table 2 - Distribution of the types of third-degree thermal burns according to the therapy adopted
Therapy |
Dressings |
Debridement |
Graft |
Type |
N |
% |
N |
% |
N |
|
Flammable agent |
10 |
9 |
2 |
4 |
18 |
24 |
Embers |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
Direct flame |
18 |
17 |
4 |
9 |
15 |
20 |
Hot liquid |
70 |
65 |
39 |
85 |
33 |
43 |
Hot surface |
7 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
8 |
Total |
108 |
100 |
46 |
100 |
76 |
100 |
Table 2 - Distribution of the types of third-degree thermal burns according to the therapy adopted
DISCUSSION
Historically, burns are easily preventable injuries, especially in children, and require
basic care directed at parents and children themselves. This is demonstrated by the
fact that 79% of burns occurred in younger than six years of age, a group with emerging
neuropsychomotor development that may not possess adequate awareness of danger and
safety. This finding is consistent with past studies, which found that children younger
than five years are more likely to sustain burns.7-11 Males were more at risk for burns, with a ratio of 1.51 males for each female, in
agreement with another study center that found 53.4% of burn victims were males.7
Among the types of burns, we found that most burns, across all age groups, were caused
by hot liquids. This finding is consistent with studies performed in other Brazilian
States7,8, developing countries such as India9,12 and Iran,11 as well as developed countries, such as Canada8 and Wales.7 This finding conforms to the so-called "hot kettle syndrome," wherein a child pulls
a pan or kettle with boiling water off a stove. This finding further illustrates the
socio-economic situation in Brazil, in which a large number of people tend to live
in a common residence, with children and adults crowding kitchen areas.
When we analyzed the regions most affected by burns, we found some interesting differences
from prior studies. A Canadian study found a predominance of lesions in the hip and
limbs.8 In contrast, Iranian researchers found a large number of burns in the limbs (47%
of the total number of lesions).11 However, in our analysis and other Brazilian studies,1,2 the most affected body region was the trunk, in contrast to other international research
findings.
Regarding the time of hospitalization of these patients, our finding of an average
of 14.5 days is in agreement with a study of other developing countries, which found
an average hospitalization duration of 17.56 days.9 A mean hospitalization of two weeks was also reported by Brazilian researchers.2,3 School-aged children, aged 7-9 years, had the longest average hospitalization duration
(17.14 days). The standard deviation was 12.02 days because there was considerable
variation in the lengths, depths, and locations of burns.
Burn depth depends on the temperature of the causal agent and the duration of contact
with the agent. Children and the elderly have more sensitive skin than adults, so
superficial more easily progress to deeper levels, worsening overall health status.
In our sample, most (61.3%) burns were second-degree. This finding is corroborated
by other studies, where second-degree burns affected 50%-70% of the patients.8-11
The vast majority (89%) of our patients had 0%-25% BSA burns, with only one patient
with burns over >75% of the BSA. However, patients with greater affected BSA generally
incur higher hospitalization costs, with more intensive therapy needs, prolonged hospitalization,
and greater attention to their wounds. In patients burned by flammable agents or embers,
the most commonly used therapy was grafting. In contrast, most patients with lesions
attributable to direct flame, hot liquids, and heated surfaces were treated with dressings.
CONCLUSION
A large number of children are involved in accidents caused by burns. This reinforces
the importance of prevention, since such burns cause physical and psychological trauma,
and are mostly irreversible. Younger children were more prone to burn injuries, and
most burn-related injuries occurred at home. Simple measures, such as keeping hot
liquids out of reach, using electrical appliances under supervision, and not leaving
children alone in the kitchen, many help prevent future accidents. Also, specialized
burn teams that are ready and able to attend to burns is critically important for
improving the prognoses of these patients.
COLLABORATIONS
MVASN
|
Conception and design study, Conceptualization, Final manuscript approval, Project
Administration, Supervision, Writing - Review & Editing
|
SMM
|
Conception and design study, Conceptualization, Final manuscript approval, Project
Administration, Supervision, Writing - Review & Editing
|
RD
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, Conception and design study, Conceptualization,
Data Curation, Final manuscript approval, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Project Administration,
Supervision, Writing - Original Draft Preparation, Writing - Review & Editing
|
CSC
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation,
Methodology, Realization of operations and/or trials, Writing - Review & Editing
|
GLAL
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation,
Methodology, Realization of operations and/or trials, Writing - Original Draft Preparation,
Writing - Review & Editing
|
REFERENCES
1. Oliveira KC, Penha CM, Macedo JM. Perfil epidemiológico de crianças vítimas de queimaduras.
Arq Med ABC. 2007;32(Supl 2):S55-8.
2. Aragão JA, Aragão MECS, Teixeira RMP, Reis FP. Estudo epidemiológico de pacientes
internados na unidade de tratamento de queimados do hospital de urgência de Sergipe.
Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2012;27(3):379-82.
3. Vale ECS. Primeiro atendimento em queimaduras: A abordagem do dermatologista. An Bras
Dermatol. 2005 Feb;80(1):9-19.
4. Rossi LA, Barruffini RCP, Garcia TR, Chianca TCM. Queimaduras: características dos
casos tratados em um hospital escola em Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brasil. Rev Panam Salud
Publica. 1998;4(6):401-4.
5. Barret JP, Herndon DN. Effects of burn wound excision on bacterial colonization and
invasion. Plast Reconstr Surg [Internet]. 2003 Fev; [cited ANO mês Dia]; 111(2):744-50;discussion:751-2.
Available from: http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00006534-200302000-00037
6. Siqueira FMB, Juliboni ÉPK. O papel da atividade terapêutica na reabilitação do indivíduo
queimado em fase aguda. Cad Ter Ocup UFSCar. 2000;8(2):79-81.
7. Sanyaolu L, Javed MU, Eales M, Hemington-Gorse S. A 10 year epidemiological study
of paediatric burns at the Welsh Centre for burns and plastic surgery. Burns [Internet].
2017; [cited ANO mês Dia]; 43(3):632-7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.10.004
8. Spinks A, Wasiak J, Cleland H, Beben N, MacPherson AK. Ten-year epidemiological study
of pediatric burns in Canada. J Burn Care Res. 2008 May/Jun;29(3):482-8.
9. Powar RS, Sudhir BM, Prabhu MD, Rajput DU, Mallapur BN. Epidemiological study of pediatric
burns at a tertiary care centre in South India. IJCMPH. 2016;3(5):1242-6.
10. Dhopte A, Tiwari VK, Patel P, Bamal R. Epidemiology of pediatric burns and future
prevention strategies - a study of 475 patients from a high-volume burn center in
North India. Burn Trauma [Internet]. 2017; 5(1):1. Available from: http://burnstrauma.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41038-016-0067-3
11. Rahmani F, Bakhtavar HE, Zamani A, Abdollahi F, Rahmani F. Demographic features of
pediatric patients with burn injuries referred to the emergency department of Sina
hospital in Tabriz, Iran, in 2014. J Anal Res Clin Med [Internet]. 2017; [cited ANO
mês Dia]; 5(1):4-8. Available from: http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/JARC M/Abstract/JARCM_1979_20161114215505
12. Kumar P, Chirayil PT, Chittoria R. Ten years epidemiological study of paediatric burns
in Manipal, India. Burns. 2000 May;26(3):261-4.
1. Hospital Universitário Evangélico de Curitiba, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
2. Faculdade Evangélica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Renata Damin Rua Magdalena Taborda Ribas, 728, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. Zip code: 81050-350. E-mail:
renatadamin@hotmail.com
Article received: February 20, 2019.
Article accepted: April 18, 2019.
Conflicts of interest: none.