INTRODUCTION
A wound is defined as a loss of skin coverage including skin, subcutaneous tissues,
muscle, and bones. Wounds can be conceptualized as a “break in the continuity of a
body structure” or a “rupture of normal tissue structures and functions.” They can
be caused by internal or external trauma to the affected tissue, ranging from an acute
and controlled injury to extensive aggression1. Wounds are classified according to how they were produced and the degrees of contamination
and tissue involvement2. Wounds are classified as medium or large when primary closure is not possible. However,
despite the lack of a single universally accepted definition, the term complex wound
usually describes wounds that can anatomically involve multiple tissues, which often
develop after devastating lesions and do not heal in a timely manner or at all. Trauma,
the leading preventable cause of death, mainly affects economically active adults,
creating a major social impact3.
Treating medium and large wounds is challenging because, without proper cleaning and
care, they can lead to complications such as infections and poor healing. Optimal
wound healing requires the removal of debris and necrotic tissue, bacterial load control,
and appropriate closure. The ideal wound closure device should be easy and fast to
use, be economical, cause no pain, and provide the best aesthetic result.
Preparation, the first step in medium and large wound resolution, involves cleaning
and debridement for subsequent flap creation or grafting. However, surgical techniques
using flaps or grafts have some disadvantages. Flaps can be cutaneous, fasciocutaneous,
muscular, or myocutaneous, use tissues from adjacent or microsurgical/distant areas,
and leave large scars and aesthetic deformities. On the other hand, skin grafts require
donor areas and usually leave hypertrophic, retracted, and/or unaesthetic scars in
the donor and recipient areas4.
Reconstructive plastic surgery is an important tool in the surgical treatment of complex
wounds. It is based on two theories regarding its planning and execution: the reconstructive
ladder and the reconstructive triangle. The ladder theory prioritizes the simplest
solution for case resolution, such as grafting. If wound resolution does not occur,
one proceeds to a more complex option, such as the use of local, expander, and free
flaps. Modern reconstructive surgery techniques and the availability of more sophisticated
equipment and materials have made the reconstructive triangle the most used model
today. In this model, the chosen surgical technique is based on anticipating the quality
of the final outcome. The chosen technique should preserve the shape and function
of the area to be rebuilt regardless of complexity, provided that the patient is safe5.
Skin properties are extremely important in wound treatment. Elasticity is the quality
that underlies the use of “elastic sutures” to close wounds over a short time span.
This type of suture has been successfully used to close medium and large wounds6.
The elastic suture technique consists of stitching a rubber band on the wound margins.
Tensioning the elastic band using an x-cross approximates the edges of the wound.
This permanent and continuous tension approximates the edges, and total closure is
achieved much faster than other closing techniques7 (Figures 1-3). To date, the material used as a rubber band is improvised by cutting surgical glove
cuffs or using a rubber band for cash sterilized in ethylene oxide8.
Figure 1 - Preoperative period.
Figure 1 - Preoperative period.
Figure 2 - Immediate postoperative period.
Figure 2 - Immediate postoperative period.
Figure 3 - Result at 15 days postoperatively.
Figure 3 - Result at 15 days postoperatively.
This study aimed to develop a sterile needled surgical elastic suture according to
the standards required by regulatory agencies. To achieve the desired objective, the
elastic suture should have the strength and elasticity of the elastic material currently
used in surgeries.
OBJECTIVE
To develop a double-needled elastic suture thread for the surgical closure of medium
and large wounds.
METHODS
The study was analyzed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal
University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) under CAAE number 6291011217.
The elastic suture described in this study was filed at the Technological Innovation
Center of the UNIFESP and evaluated for registration as a utility model at the National
Institute of Industrial Property (Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial [INPI]).
Patent search
The present search was conducted by the patent office Clarke, Modet & C°, a NIT-UNIFESP-accredited
company, to locate possible invention patent (IP) or utility model (UM) documents.
PatBase® patent search software was also used.
The following international databases were used in the patent search: European Patent
Office (www.epo.org); United States Patent and Trademark Office (www.uspto.gov); World Intellectual Property Organization (www.wipo.int); State Intellectual Property Office of China (english.sipo.gov.cn); and Japan Patent Office (www.jpo.go.jp). The INPI database (www.inpi.gov.br) was searched.
The following keywords were used for the search, including their derivatives (singular
and plural) and the combinations of these words with their synonyms in English and
Portuguese: surgery, suture thread, suture line, surgery seam, elastic, flexible,
and stretch.
The International Patent Classification was also used for a more specific search.
The classification related to the present invention was:
Section: A - Human needs.
Class: A61 - Medical or veterinary science; hygiene.
Subclass: A61B - Diagnostic methods, surgery, identification.
A61B 17/03 - Wound suturing instruments.
A61B 17/04 - Wound closure instruments.
Prototype development
Material search
Internet search tools (Google) were used to find laboratories that produced elastic
materials, mainly silicone and rubber, and could potentially make an elastic tensile
cylindrical cord similar to the elastic material used in elastic sutures. After a
few visits, we found a company in the silicone industry called Silicoflex, the most technologically prepared to develop the product. The main silicone component
is silicon, the most abundant element on the Earth’s surface after oxygen9 (Figure 5).
Suture prototype
The prototype begins with the production of a silicone rubber blanket that goes through
several mixtures from which the operator collects samples to determine color and hardness
using the shore durometer device9. This sample is placed in an extruder machine and the material gets the desired shape
according to the matrix, in this case, a cylindrical cord10. The material passes through a heating tunnel with temperatures of 150-200 °C, where
the silicone is vulcanized. Finally, the material is placed in a post-curing oven
(200 °C/2 hours) to eliminate odors; after being treated with a catalyst, it becomes
nontoxic. Subsequently, the cords are evaluated for size, hardness, and appearance11.
The produced prototypes had diameters of 2.8 and 2.5 mm, similarly to the elastic
materials, and 40, 50, and 60 shore density (Figure 4A). Manual, tactile, and visual tests favored the 50-shore density prototype, whose
samples were sent to the Falcão Bauer Laboratory - Quality Control Technology Center
- for elasticity, strength, and tension evaluations.
Figure 4 - A: Silicone molecule; B: Molecular formula of silicone.
Figure 4 - A: Silicone molecule; B: Molecular formula of silicone.
The laboratory tested five specimens (200-mm length) that were fixed one at a time
to the test machine hooks and pulled at a constant speed of 50 mm/min until rupture.
Maximum strength and elongation at rupture were recorded (Table 1).
Table 1 - Results of tests performed by Falcão Bauer laboratory evaluating elasticity, resistance
and tension.
Test |
Value found |
TB1 |
TB2 |
TB3 |
TB4 |
TB5 |
Mean |
Maximum strength, kgf |
5.05 |
4.95 |
4.55 |
4.60 |
4.40 |
4.71 |
Elongation at rupture, % |
10001.33 |
816.52 |
705.16 |
773.99 |
891.51 |
837.70 |
Table 1 - Results of tests performed by Falcão Bauer laboratory evaluating elasticity, resistance
and tension.
A comparison with the elastic material normally used for elastic sutures showed that
the length of the thread could be 45 cm, meeting the parameters already standardized
by surgical suture companies. The double-needled elastic thread was produced with
needle length, diameter, and type similar to those of standard suture threads (Figure 4B).
RESULTS
The Clarke, Modet & C° office selected five documents that matched the research objective
to identify products that were similar to the elastic suture developed in this study.
The identified products were classified by relevance according to the following scale:
low (2), medium (2), and high (1).
Tables 1-5 summarize the information presented in the technical patent reports and compare the
patented devices with the device developed in the present study in terms of applicability,
material used, and usage.
Table 1 - Comparative 1.
Study device |
Characteristics compared to patents |
Study device |
Applicability |
Material |
Usage |
|
Large wound closure |
Silicone |
Elastic sutures |
Patent 1 FR2926452A1 |
|
Ligament replacement or hernias |
Braided polyurethane |
Internal surgery |
Table 2 - Comparative 2.
Study device |
Characteristics compared to patents |
Study device |
Applicability |
Material |
Usage |
|
Large wound closure |
Silicone |
Elastic sutures |
Patent 2 us4621638 |
No image |
Corneal suture 1 mm diameter |
Polymers |
Corneal suture (edema)
|
Table 3 - Comparative 3.
Study device |
Characteristics compared to patent |
Study device |
Applicability |
Material |
Usage |
|
Large wound closure |
Silicone |
Elastic sutures |
Patent 3 us2006121274 |
|
Wound suture |
Non-elastic thread with elastic core |
Sutures requiring low thread elasticity |
Table 4 - Comparative 4.
Study device |
Characteristics compared to patents |
Study device |
Applicability |
Material |
Usage |
|
Large wound closure |
Silicone |
Elastic sutures |
Patent 4 US5102419A |
No image |
Suture in an area with edema |
Various polymers |
Suture in an area with edema |
Table 5 - Comparative 5.
Study device |
Characteristics compared to patents |
Study device |
Applicability |
Material |
Usage |
|
Large wound closure |
Silicone |
Elastic sutures |
Patent 5 W00112073AL |
|
Vascular suture (anastomoses) |
Isoplastic (polymer): A mixture of polyurethane, silicone, rubber, and others |
Vascular sutures |
The results of the tests at Falcão Bauer Laboratory evaluating the device’s elasticity,
resistance, and tension are presented in Table 1. The data show that the elastic suture prototype presented in this study has a mean
elastic capacity 8.3 times its original length, greater tensile strength than the
elastic material currently used, and great elastic capacity (1001.33%) and tensile
strength (Falcão Bauer Laboratory).
The analysis of the data presented in Table 1 comparing the prototype to currently used elastic materials show that, despite some
similarities, the elasticity properties along the entire thread, diameter of 2.5 mm
(increasing strength), and double needles make the prototype a useful model. The device
developed in this study is called ElasticLine (Figures 6 and 7).
Figure 6 - Suture thread prototype.
Figure 6 - Suture thread prototype.
DISCUSSION
The present study describes the development of ElasticLine, a sterilizable elastic cylindrical monofilament thread prototype 2.5 mm in diameter
when not tensioned created for elastic sutures. The ElasticLine is expected to be used in simple and fast elastic sutures using a product manufactured
for this purpose that meets the requirements and standards outlined for medical products
by the supervising bodies. The development of the ElasticLine is timely because, to date, plastic surgeons have improvised elastic sutures with
cuffs cut out from surgical gloves or elastic rubber bands7.
The viscoelastic properties of the skin allow the use of devices that stretch it through
constant traction and maintain the edges of large wounds in contact to enable closure
without exacerbated tension. Several types of skin stretching devices have already
been described, such as the four pins inserted by Kirschner around a wound in 1987.
In addition, in 1995, Armstrong developed a mechanical device for attaching wound
edges, while Narayanan used a metal cylinder fixed inside the wound for suture traction
in 1995. These devices are uncomfortable and costly. In 2011, Ismavel16 sutured the edges of large wounds using glove cuffs. This technique was the inspiration
for the present study of the development of a specific elastic suture thread called
the ElasticLine.
The development of an elastic suture thread is necessary given the rigorous health
surveillance of the use of appropriate products for each function and the need for
a product like the currently used sutures. The ElasticLine enhances the elastic properties of the skin without causing dehiscence, which is
very common with the use of inelastic sutures that promote high skin tension12.
Silicone was the raw material chosen to produce the ElasticLine due to being easily available, being of low cost (approximately BRL 5.00/m), having
high elastic capacity (1001.33%), and having high tensile strength. It is also nontoxic
and sterilizable, recommended for surgical procedures according to the rules of regulatory
agencies such as the National Health Surveillance Agency.
The inclusion of double needles will facilitate elastic suturing by x-crossing the
thread. The other devices found in the patent search have different diameters and
elasticity levels and do not have double needles, thereby establishing important differences
between this utility model and the other devices.
It is increasingly important to search for practical and inexpensive solutions for
medical treatments. The development of modern surgical devices is of paramount importance
since easier procedures benefit surgeons and patients.
Social impact
Traffic accidents are the leading cause of injuries requiring surgical intervention.
Causing 1.2 million deaths per year worldwide and approximately 40,000 deaths in Brazil,
they represent a major health problem13.
In 2013, Sistema Único de Saúde spent approximately BRL 231,000,000.0014 on traffic accident victims alone.
The ElasticLine is expected to provide low-cost healing for patients with medium and large wounds
in a short time span, thereby reducing long-term hospitalization costs. The Brazilian
health surveillance agency does not allow the use of rubber bands for hair, and the
high cost of the current wound closure devices represents a limitation for their use,
especially in the public health system, where a large number of patients require wound
treatment15.
The applicability of the ElasticLine using the elastic suture technique should be tested in a prospective experimental
study in rats and subsequently in humans to prove that its tensile strength is sufficient
for use in animal or human wounds without damaging the tissues. The ElasticLine has the potential for use in other types of surgical procedures besides skin wound
closure, such as tumor resection and large dehiscence closures. However, new uses
will depend on further specific study findings.
CONCLUSION
The ElasticLine is a double-needled elastic suture that was developed for the surgical closure of
medium and large wounds.
COLLABORATIONS
ELNS
|
Project Administration, Realization of operations and/or trials, Writing - Original
Draft Preparation, Writing - Review & Editing
|
EBG
|
Supervision
|
LMF
|
Final manuscript approval
|
REFERENCES
1. Morris JP, Wood WC, Chery GW, Hughes MA, Leaper DJ, Ferguson MWJ. Wound healing. In:
Morris PJ, Wood WC, editors. Oxford textbook of surgery. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University
Press; 2001. p.129-59.
2. Blanes L. Tratamento de feridas. In: Baptista-Silva JCC, editor. Cirurgia vascular:
guia ilustrado. São Paulo: 2004. Disponível em: http://www.bapbaptista.com
3. Castro RRM, Ribeiro NF, Andrade AM, Jaques BD. Perfil dos pacientes da enfermaria
de ortopedia de um Hospital Público de Salvador-Bahia. Acta Ortop Bras. 2013 Aug;21(4):191-94.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522013000400001
4. Hochberg J. Retalhos musculares e miocutâneos. In: Mélega JM, Zanini SA, Psillakis
JM. Cirurgia Plástica Reparadora e Estética. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: MEDSI; 1997. p.97-101.
5. Teixeira Neto N, Chi A, Paggiaro AO, Ferreira MC. Surgical treatment of complex wounds.
Rev Med (São Paulo). 2010 Jul/Dez;89(3/4):147-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v89i3/4p147-151
6. Petroianu A, Sabino KR, Alberti LR. Closure of large wound with rubber elastic circular
strips - case report. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014 Jan/Mar;27(1):86-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-67202014000100021
7. Santos ELN, Oliveira RA. Sutura elástica para tratamento de grandes feridas. Rev Bras
Cir Plást. 2012;27(3):475-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-51752012000300026
8. Santos ELN, Oliveira RA. Wound treatment using elastic sutures. Rev Bras Cir Plást.
2014;29(4):587-8.
9. Rodrigues LEMJ. Fundamentos da Engenharia Aeronáutica com Aplicações ao Projeto SAE-Aerodesign:
Estabilidade e Estruturas. 1ª ed. São Paulo; 2014.
10. Costa W. Comportamento das forças de adesão do adesivo selante de silicone [tese].
São Paulo (SP): Escola Politécnica - USP; 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-14282011005000013
11. Silicoflex Industria e Artefatos de Silicone. Manual Técnico - São Paulo; 2017.
12. Góes CHFS, Kawasaki MC, Mélega JM. Fechamento de Feridas por Tração Cutânea Intra-operatória.
Análise de 23 Casos. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2004;19(2):69-74.
13. Polyana MPM, et al. Qualifying information on deaths and serious injuries caused by
road traffic in five Brazilian capitals using record linkage. Accid Anal Prev. 2017
Sep; [cited 2019 Fev 22]; 106:392-298. Disponível em: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001457517302324
14. Paula, Patrícia de, Países assinam acordo para reduzir número de vítimas de trânsito,
Ministerio da Saúde, Agencia Saúde, 2015.
15. Ministério da Saúde, Boletim Epidemiológico, Secret. De Vigilância Sanitária, Vol.
44 Nº8 2013.
16. Ismavel R, Samuel S, Boopalan PRJVC, Chittaranjan SB. A Simple Solution for Wound
Coverage by Skin Stretching. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2011 Mar;25(3):127-32.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318206f556
1. Unifesp, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Eduardo Luiz Nigri dos Santos Rua Professor Lair Remusat Renno, 30, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Zip Code: 30210-320.
E-mail: eduardonigri@terra.com.br
Article received: February 25, 2019.
Article accepted: June 22, 2019.
Conflicts of interest: none.