INTRODUCTION
Abdominoplasty techniques have constantly evolved since 1899, when Kelly1 performed an elliptical lipectomy to correct abdominal lipodystrophy. A century later,
incisions are lower and the standard largely detached abdominal flap provides greater
mobility and greater skin excision and umbilical transposition. In 2001, Saldanha
et al.2 broke paradigms by presenting a new surgical concept for the aesthetic treatment
of the abdominal region following the principles of liposuction to preserve lateral
perforating vessels and allowing small detachment of the supraumbilical region with
superior aesthetic results2. From 2003 to 2009, this technique was improved and became the modern treatment of
abdominal lipodystrophy3,4,5. Modern liposuction techniques are currently used; in 20186, Hoyos et al. introduced the concept of high-definition liposuction in abdominoplasty
using ultrasound-assisted liposuction and neoumbilicoplasty to correct stigmas secondary
to the procedure, such as a “tense” appearance and a lack of natural abdominal convexity
and concavity6. Here we propose a technique to redefine natural abdominal anatomy using traditional
lipoabdominoplasty with selective liposuction to achieve more natural-looking surgical
results that are reproducible for most patients.
OBJECTIVE
To describe a technique of superficial and deep abdominal liposuction on the linea
alba and semilunar line to better define the abdominal flap in abdominoplasty.
METHODS
This study included abdominoplasty patients presenting with type IV and V lipodystrophy
as classified by Pitanguy in 19955. The patients were non-smokers who maintained a stable weight in the previous 6 months,
had a body mass index below 30, and had no prohibitive comorbidities for the procedure.
All procedures were approved by the medical board of the Santa Casa Plastic Surgery
and Reconstructive Microsurgery Service, and all patients signed an informed consent
form. Between November 2018 and May 2019, 21 procedures were performed using the described
technique. The same surgeon performed each procedure, followed up each patient with
photographic records at 30, 90, and 180 days postoperatively, and continues following
them today.
Marking
After marking the dermolipectomy area with the patient in the orthostatic position,
we identify the intersection between the costal margin and the lateral border of the
rectus abdominis muscle (point A) and draw a line through the lateral border of the
rectus abdominis muscle from this point to the pubic symphysis according to the patient’s
anatomy. This line is measured bilaterally up to the linea alba to avoid asymmetry.
To delimit the liposuction area (deep and superficial) and achieve higher definition,
the costal line is marked bilaterally up to 4-5 cm from point A to form point B. Next,
a line is drawn from point B to the rectus abdominis muscle insertion, forming the
future semilunar sulcus, the area where the deep and superficial liposuction will
be performed. The midline where the liposuction will be performed is marked up to
a point about 5-6 cm from the navel to prevent an infraumbilical midline depression
and to preserve distal vascularization. The most distal part of the abdominal flap
and a lateral area of 1.5 cm are demarcated as a transition zone between the linea
alba and the rectus abdominis muscle (Figure 1).
Figure 1 - Preoperative markings
Figure 1 - Preoperative markings
Surgery
The patient undergoes general anesthesia with preventive measures taken to avoid deep
vein thrombosis, such as knee flexion, the use of pneumatic compression boots, and
the use of a thermal blanket for temperature control. If planned, surgery begins with
the patient in the prone position for liposuction of the back. Surgical drapes are
changed and the patient is moved to a supine position. After antisepsis and the placement
of sterile drapes, the abdominal flap area is infiltrated with a tumescent solution
of 0.9% saline and adrenaline 1:1,000,000. The patient is placed in a supine position
with a slight extension of 15° and the liposuction begins in the supraumbilical linea
alba through an incision in the internal cranial part of the navel using a 3-mm cannula
in the superficial plane and 4-mm cannula in the deep plane with care taken not to
mark an area up to 7 cm from the navel since it is the infraumbilical area where the
linea alba is not visible. Next, liposuction is performed in a transition area of
approximately 2 cm laterally to the linea alba to create a gradual transition with
the rectus abdominis muscle. The entire rectus abdominis area is deeply aspirated
to thin the flap without pairing with the central area. After liposuction is performed
in the central area, the concave region determined by the semilunar line is recreated
to obtain the semilunar sulcus with deep and superficial liposuction performed through
the inguinal incisions at the level of the rectus abdominis muscle insertion. We used
a 4-mm cannula for the deep liposuction and a 3-mm cannula for the superficial liposuction.
It is important to aspirate up to 3-4 cm above the demarcated area, correcting the
descending distance of the flap.
After satisfactory fat aspiration from this area and a natural shadow effect are achieved,
the flanks are deeply aspirated to obtain a better body outline.
After the liposuction is completed, an abdominoplasty is performed. The flap is gradually
brought down using adhesive sutures as described by Baroudi and Ferreira in 19987, maintaining the position of the semilunar sulcus and linea alba recreated in the
flap according to the patient’s abdominal wall anatomy using sutures at the corresponding
points. If necessary, the procedure is followed by an open lipectomy as described
by Saltz in 20148. No drains are used (Figure 2). The patient is kept in Fowler’s position in the recovery room and discharged the
next day. An outpatient return is scheduled 3 days after surgery for a follow-up consultation.
The mean surgical time is 240 minutes when there is associated back liposuction and
200 minutes when no back liposuction is performed. The patient starts lymphatic drainage
5 days postoperatively.
Figure 2 - Photographs of the patient’s immediately pre- and postoperative appearance.
Figure 2 - Photographs of the patient’s immediately pre- and postoperative appearance.
RESULTS
The cases operated during this period presented no complications. Surgical results
are shown in Figures 3-7. There was a greater prominence of abdominal concavities such as the semilunar sulcus
and linea alba.
Figure 3 - Photos taken preoperatively and at 30 and 90 days postoperatively.
Figure 3 - Photos taken preoperatively and at 30 and 90 days postoperatively.
Figure 4 - Photographs of the patient preoperatively and 90 days postoperatively.
Figure 4 - Photographs of the patient preoperatively and 90 days postoperatively.
Figure 5 - Photographs of a patient taken preoperatively and at 180 days postoperatively.
Figure 5 - Photographs of a patient taken preoperatively and at 180 days postoperatively.
Figure 6 - Photographs of a patient taken preoperatively and at 90 days postoperatively.
Figure 6 - Photographs of a patient taken preoperatively and at 90 days postoperatively.
Figure 7 - Photographs of a patient taken preoperatively and at 180 days postoperatively.
Figure 7 - Photographs of a patient taken preoperatively and at 180 days postoperatively.
DISCUSSION
Although the results of the current lipoabdominoplasty techniques are reproducible
and aesthetically satisfactory, stigmas such as the stretched aspect of the abdominal
flap are relevant since they result in an unnatural appearance6. In 20049, Lockwood described unwanted results like a tense appearance in the central abdominal
region, excess skin, inguinal and lateral sagging, a suprapubic depressed scar, cranially
oriented pubic hair, poor waist definition, and hypertrophic and asymmetric scars.
In 20186, Hoyos et al. added a tense-looking abdomen, lack of convexity and concavity, short
distance between the navel and scar, constricted or larger than normal navel, hyperchromic
umbilical scar, and residual umbilical hernia to the list.
Abdominal contour depends on age, genetics, muscle mass, intra- and extra-abdominal
adiposity, pregnancy history, pathologies, and body posture. The shape of the abdominal
wall is created by the relationship between the musculoskeletal system, subcutaneous
tissue, fibroadipose tissue, and skin. These relationships give the appearance of
an aesthetic contour with light reflecting prominences and shadowing depressions.
A shadow is formed on the midline by the depression of a sulcus corresponding to the
linea alba from the xiphoid to the navel. Laterally to this sulcus, there are two
broad vertical convex areas produced by the prominence of the rectus abdominis muscles
that join together beneath the navel. More laterally and slightly posteriorly to these
prominences, there are two broad depressions called the semilunar sulci that produce
a “lyre” shape by insertion of the skin into the condensation of the oblique muscles
fasciae, the external border of the rectus muscles, the inguinal ligaments, and the
pubis10.
Therefore, a natural-looking abdomen has a marked and subtle linea alba above the
navel and a transition region between the lateral border of the rectus abdominis and
oblique muscles with well-defined concavity, which in lateral view has a double “S”
shape. This is the natural appearance that patients want. Since the morphological
profile of most patients is not athletic (Figure 8), the objective of this study is not to achieve a high-definition liposuction standard
with well-defined abdominal muscles (Figure 8).
Figure 8 - Anatomical considerations for obtaining a natural-looking abdomen (edited by the author
on an image not filtered by license available on the internet).
Figure 8 - Anatomical considerations for obtaining a natural-looking abdomen (edited by the author
on an image not filtered by license available on the internet).
To produce three-dimensional effects, we must understand the concept of “chiaroscuro,”
a painting technique introduced by Leonardo Da Vinci in the 1511 century. Chiaroscuro,
also called tonal perspective, is defined by the contrast between light and shadow
in the representation of an object, creating a three-dimensional effect by predicting
and reproducing the effect of light on the object. Tonal progression creates depth
perception and a sensation of plenitude where shadows intensify as they move away
from light. In liposuction, we create shadows by selectively removing fat from an
area, visually transforming it into a concave area, and consequently making the adjacent
area more convex. Therefore, we create shadows by removing more subcutaneous fat in
a given area and add light by forming convexities. The transition area between these
two points determines how natural the final result will look. It is important to highlight
that a sudden change between light and dark will create an artificial appearance.
After this study, we determined three points of consideration to achieve this natural
appearance: correct preoperative anatomical marking, proper shadow-convexity transition
effect during liposuction, and flap repositioning on the abdominal wall (Figures 9 and 10).
Figure 9 - Determining technical factors for obtaining a natural appearance (edited by the author
on an image not filtered by a license available on the internet).
Figure 9 - Determining technical factors for obtaining a natural appearance (edited by the author
on an image not filtered by a license available on the internet).
Figure 10 - Abdominal concavity and convexity defined using superficial and deep liposuction (edited
by the author on image not filtered by license available on the internet).
Figure 10 - Abdominal concavity and convexity defined using superficial and deep liposuction (edited
by the author on image not filtered by license available on the internet).
Safe liposuction on the abdominal flap has currently been reviewed. In 197912, Huger divided the abdominal vascular supply into three zones: zone I, the central
abdomen, supplied by the deep and superficial branches of the superior epigastric
artery; zone III, the peripheral abdomen, supplied by intercostal, subcostal, and
lumbar perforators; and zone II, the inferior abdomen, supplied by the deep inferior
epigastric artery, deep and superficial circumflex iliac artery, and superficial external
pudendal artery. During abdominoplasty, zone II is resected; there is concern regarding
flap viability after detaching zone I. In articles written in 1995 and 2000, Matarasso13,14recommended being careful when aspirating the central abdomen and advised the use
of a thick flap. More recently, with safer and more limited detachments, some studies
suggest that liposuction in the central abdomen is safe as long as the lateral perforating
vessels are preserved15,16 and the procedure does not exceed 7.5 cm laterally of midline17.
Recent studies on flap vascularization compared the preservation and total sectioning
of perforating vessels using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging, showing no differences
in perfusion and corroborating the thesis that even larger dissections can be performed
with liposuction18. The technique presented in this study does not include aggressive liposuction on
the central abdomen to maintain some level of rectus abdominis muscle convexity and,
theoretically, increasing safety during the procedure. Deep and superficial liposuction
is performed only in selected areas according to the patient’s anatomy.
CONCLUSION
The technique showed satisfactory aesthetic results of achieving a natural abdominal
appearance using deep and superficial liposuction in abdominal shadowed areas. This
study showed that the technique is vascularly safe as well as reproducible due to
the use of conventional liposuction available to the vast majority of plastic surgeons.
COLLABORATIONS
LMP
|
Conception and design study, Project Administration, Writing - Original Draft Preparation
|
MRT
|
Conceptualization, Final manuscript approval, Supervision
|
FMFN
|
Data Curation, Project Administration
|
PBE
|
Final manuscript approval, Supervision
|
NS
|
Final manuscript approval
|
REFERENCES
1. Kelly HA. Report of gynecological cases. Johns Hopkins Med J. 1899;10:197.
2. Saldanha O, Pinto E, Matos W, et al. Lipoabdominoplasty without undermining. Aesthet
Surg J. 2001 Nov;21(6):518-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/maj.2001.121243
3. Saldanha OR, Pinto EBS, Matos Júnior WN, et al. Lipoabdominoplasty with selective
and safe undermining. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003 Jul/Aug;27(4):322-7. PMID: 15058559
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-003-3016-z
4. Saldanha OR, Federico R, Daher PF, et al. Lipoabdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2009 Sep;124(3):934-42. PMID: 19730314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b037e3
5. Pitanguy I. Abdominoplasty: classification and surgical techniques. Rev Bras Cir 1995;85:23-44.
6. Hoyos A, Perez ME, Guarin DE, Montenegro A. A report of 736 high-definition lipoabdominoplasties
performed in conjunction with circumferential VASER liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2018 Sep;142(3):662-675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004705
7. Baroudi R, Ferreira CA. Seroma: how to avoid it and how to treat it. Aesthet Surg
J. 1998 Nov/Dec;18(6):439-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-820X(98)70073-1
8. Saltz R. Two position comprehensive approach to abdominoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 2014
Oct;41(4):681-704. PMID: 25283455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2014.07.008
9. Lockwood TE. Maximizing aesthetics in lateral-tension abdominoplasty and body lifts.
Clin Plast Surg. 2004 Oct;31(4):523-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2004.04.001
10. Shiffman MA, Mirrafati S. Aesthetic surgery of the abdominal wall. Berlin: Springer-Verlag;
2005.
11. Duhrkoop D. Chiaroscuro in Painting: The Power of Light and Dark. 2007; [access in
ANO mês DIA]. Available from: http://www.emptyeasel.com
12. Huger Junior WE. The anatomic rationale for abdominal lipectomy. Am Surg. 1979 Sep;45(9):612-7.
13. Matarasso A. Liposuction as an adjunct to a full abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg.
1995 Apr;95(5):829-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199595050-00010
14. Matarasso A. Liposuction as an adjunct to a full abdominoplasty revisited. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 2000 Oct;106(5):1197-1202;discussion:1203-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200010000-00035
15. Smith LF, Smith Junior LF. Safely combining abdominoplasty with aggressive abdominal
liposuction based on perforator vessels: technique and a review of 300 consecutive
cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 May;135(5):1357-1366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001200
16. Brauman D, Capocci J. Liposuction abdominoplasty: an advanced body contouring technique.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov;124(5):1685-95. PMID: 20009857 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98c5d
17. Swanson E. Comparison of limited and full dissection abdominoplasty using laser fluorescence
imaging to evaluate perfusion of the abdominal skin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul;136(1):31e-43e.
PMID: 26111330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001376
1. Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Leonardo Milanesi Possamai Rua Marquês do Pombal 450, Apartamento 304, Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Zip Code: 90540-000. E-mail: leonardopossamai@hotmail.com
Article received: May 10, 2019.
Article accepted: July 8, 2019.
Institution: Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Conflitos de interesse: não há.