INTRODUCTION
Skin grafts are not effective in covering the lesions in the distal third of the
lower limbs that expose the bones, joints, tendons, and blood vessels due to a
limited vascular bed and poor granulation of the wounds. These lesions can only
be corrected with microsurgical transfer, muscle, myocutaneous, or
fasciocutaneous flaps1-3.
Adequate protection of these structures with minimal sequelae in the donor area
and constant vascularization are some of the factors that have been considered
for ideal coverage. The main limiting factors are the dimensions, depth of the
lesion, and presence of osteomyelitis4.
The reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap should consider two principles: the
length × width ratio of the flap and that the flap should be based on a
proximal pedicle5.
Since 1980s, with a good understanding of the anatomy of the lower limbs and
improvement of myocutaneous flaps, several techniques have been proposed to
reconstruct the distal third of the lower limbs. In 1983, Pontén described the
larger leg flaps with inclusion of the fascia. In the same year, Donski &
Fogdestam proposed the distal pedicle fasciocutaneous flap based on the fibular
artery. The reverse fasciofat flap based on perforating branches of the
posterior tibial artery was described by Gumener et al. in 1990 for
reconstruction of the malleolar and calcaneal regions, accompanied by primary
closure of the donor area6. Additionally,
in 1990, Carriquiry5 proposed a reverse
fasciocutaneous flap based on two blood supplies, myocutaneous and
septocutaneous perforators (from the fibular and posterior tibial arteries),
isolating and preserving the sural nerve and medial superficial sural artery
that accompanies the sural nerve. In 1992, Masquelet et al. described the
reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap based on the sural neurovascular pedicle5.
OBJECTIVE
To demonstrate the feasibility of the reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap
described by Carriquiry to cover the lower third of the limbs and foot
injuries.
METHODS
Surgery was performed in eight patients admitted to the Hospital de Base de São
José do Rio Preto, SP, in the Plastic Surgery Service of FAMERP/FUNFARME, from
2013 to 2018. All patients had lesions that exposed the bones and tendons in the
distal region of the limbs, dorsum of the foot, or both, and the reverse sural
fasciocutaneous flap was used with the technique proposed by Carriquiry in 1990.
The study protocol followed the principles of Helsinki Declaration.
Regional anatomy
The skin, subcutaneous cellular tissue, and muscular fascia of the calf are
extensively vascularized. The dense suprafascial vascular plexus, which has
the main anastomoses oriented longitudinally, and the rich septocutaneous
perforator system, together with the well-known and widely used
musculocutaneous and axial systems, contribute to the creation of safe
fasciocutaneous flaps in this region5.
The flap described by Carriquiry is based on the medial and lateral
septocutaneous arteries of the posterior limb that anastomose with each
other and with the superficial sural artery through longitudinally-oriented
suprafascial arches5 (Figure 1).
Figure 1 - Schematic representation of the cutaneous arterial supply of
the limb. Medial (msc) and lateral (lsc), septocutaneous
anastomoses, musculocutaneous (mc) and superficial sural artery
(a) perforators. Source: Carriquiry CE. Heel coverage with a
deepithelialized distally based fasciocutaneous flap. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 1990;85(1):116-9.
5
Figure 1 - Schematic representation of the cutaneous arterial supply of
the limb. Medial (msc) and lateral (lsc), septocutaneous
anastomoses, musculocutaneous (mc) and superficial sural artery
(a) perforators. Source: Carriquiry CE. Heel coverage with a
deepithelialized distally based fasciocutaneous flap. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 1990;85(1):116-9.
5
The most significant input to the suprafascial plexus in the lower half of
the limb comes from the septocutaneous system, as the axial vessels do not
reach such distal regions and musculocutaneous perforators are infrequent at
this level5.
Therefore, the blood is supplied via the distal septocutaneous vessels
through longitudinal anastomoses in the suprafascial plexus during the
elevation of distal fasciocutaneous flaps5.
In the popliteal fossa, the tibial nerve gives rise to the medial sural
cutaneous nerve, which joins the lateral sural cutaneous nerve from the
common fibular nerve to form the sural nerve. This nerve supplies the skin
on the posterior and lateral sides of the limbs and the lateral side of the
ankle and foot, and it should be preserved to maintain the sensitivity of
this region7 (Figure 2). The flap described in this study preserves
the sural nerve in its original bed, maintaining its sensory function.
Figure 2 - Schematic representations of the vessels and nerves of the
popliteal fossa (left) and cutaneous nerves of the lower limb,
posterior view (right). Source: Sobotta J, Waschke J. Sobotta
Atlas de Anatomia Humana. 23
rd ed. Rio de Janeiro:
Guanabara Koogan, 2012.
8
Figure 2 - Schematic representations of the vessels and nerves of the
popliteal fossa (left) and cutaneous nerves of the lower limb,
posterior view (right). Source: Sobotta J, Waschke J. Sobotta
Atlas de Anatomia Humana. 23
rd ed. Rio de Janeiro:
Guanabara Koogan, 2012.
8
Surgical technique
The lower border of the flap was marked 5 cm above the lateral and medial
malleoli (the pivot point of rotation). The upper border was marked after
providing a sufficient length for the complete coverage of the lesion, which
corresponds to the distance from the pedicle of the flap to the most distal
point of the lesion, also considering the required rotation to cover the
lesion; this distance is the length of the flap. The incision was performed
in the marked upper border, and the skin and subcutaneous tissue were
elevated together with the muscle fascia.
Approximately 1 cm should be preserved on either side of the lateral borders
of the Achilles tendon, as the medial and lateral septocutaneous arteries of
the posterior region of the limbs emerge in that region. The sural nerve was
preserved in its original bed and subsequently placed between the
gastrocnemius muscles and covered by them to prevent their exposure. The
flap was elevated to the marked lower point-the pivot-in the lower third of
the limb (Figure 3).
Figure 3 - Schematic representation of the elevation of the
fasciocutaneous flap with a distal pedicle. Source: Carriquiry
CE. Heel coverage with a deepithelialized distally based
fasciocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg.
1990;85(1):116-9.
5
Figure 3 - Schematic representation of the elevation of the
fasciocutaneous flap with a distal pedicle. Source: Carriquiry
CE. Heel coverage with a deepithelialized distally based
fasciocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg.
1990;85(1):116-9.
5
At this point, the flap was transposed at a sufficient angle to reach the
lesion (approximately 150°). It is not necessary to maintain the
fasciosubcutaneous border beyond the skin island, and the subcutaneous
tissue and fascia can have the same size as the cutaneous portion of the
flap. Three weeks after this first step, the flap was released (sufficient
size to keep the lesion covered), and its other part was returned to the
donor bed. At this time, full-thickness skin grafts from the inguinal region
were also used to cover the donor area of the flap.
RESULTS
The surgical procedures performed using the technique described by Carriquiry
showed satisfactory functional results (Figures 4-6).
Figure 4 - A: Preoperative; B: Immediately
postoperative; C: Immediately postoperative;
D: Late postoperative; E: Late
postoperative.
Figure 4 - A: Preoperative; B: Immediately
postoperative; C: Immediately postoperative;
D: Late postoperative; E: Late
postoperative.
Figure 5 - A: Preoperative; B: Immediately
postoperative; C: Immediately postoperative;
D: Late postoperative; E: Late
postoperative; F: Late postoperative; G:
Late postoperative.
Figure 5 - A: Preoperative; B: Immediately
postoperative; C: Immediately postoperative;
D: Late postoperative; E: Late
postoperative; F: Late postoperative; G:
Late postoperative.
Figure 6 - A: Preoperative; B: Preoperative;
C: Immediate postoperative; D:
Immediately postoperative; E: Immediately
postoperative; F: Late postoperative; G:
Late postoperative; H: Late postoperative.
Figure 6 - A: Preoperative; B: Preoperative;
C: Immediate postoperative; D:
Immediately postoperative; E: Immediately
postoperative; F: Late postoperative; G:
Late postoperative; H: Late postoperative.
To achieve these results, care was taken in the management of these patients,
such as 1) pedicle care to ensure that there was no tapering, twisting, or
compression, both intraoperatively and in the postoperative period; 2)
identification of the medial sural nerve so that it remained in its original
topography and was not sectioned or dissected together with the flap; 3)
stimulation of venous drainage through retrograde massage of the flap; and 4)
immobilization of the ankle joint.
Only one case showed complications in the postoperative period, evolving with
ischemia and superficial skin necrosis in the distal portion of the flap, which
was resolved with debridement and grafting of the skin posteriorly (Figure 7). The other cases showed
satisfactory progression with total coverage of the lesions.
Figure 7 - A: Case with complications; B: Case
with complications; C: Case with complications, late
postoperative.
Figure 7 - A: Case with complications; B: Case
with complications; C: Case with complications, late
postoperative.
DISCUSSION
The distal third of the lower limb is often exposed to trauma. Thus, it is
difficult to reconstruct this region when skin coverage is necessary 6. Accidents with motorcycles are the main
source of these injuries9. Out of the
eight cases in this study, five were caused by this type of trauma.
It is always difficult to cover this region with skin. In this segment, there is
no interposition of the muscular tissues between the noble structures and
integument; thus, it has limited distensibility and mobility. Therefore, the use
of skin grafts and random rotation flaps is inadequate for wounds that affect
the full thickness of the skin10. In
these cases, it is necessary to use distant flaps, which can be fasciocutaneous
or free11.
The reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap described by Carriquiry is easy to use,
reliable, and allows for simple postoperative care. It has a wide rotation angle
(up to 150°) without a large pedicle volume. Special care should be taken in the
subdermal dissection of the pedicle to minimize the final esthetic sequelae.
Although similar to the reverse-flow sural flap, the main difference is the
preservation of the sural nerve, thereby maintaining its sensory function. It
also differs as the fasciosubcutaneous border does not need to be maintained
beyond the skin island, and the lateral borders of the Achilles tendon need to
be preserved, not only the region near the lateral malleolus as in the sural
flap.
The reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap is a good alternative to microsurgical
flaps, which are highly complex and technically difficult, have a high hospital
cost, and a lengthy surgical time (mean of 8 hours)12.
However, the use of these flaps is contraindicated in cases of previous trauma in
the medial or lateral region of the limbs that affect the pedicle of the flap,
since this compromises its vascularization5.
In the present study, this flap was used in lesions located in the distal region
of the limbs and dorsum of the foot that exposed the bones and tendons,
including an exposed fracture or tendon injury.
CONCLUSION
The flap used in this study corrects lesions of the lower third of the limbs and
foot. It is relatively easy to prepare, with a good vascular supply, based on
more than one pedicle and without functional loss of the donor bed. As
disadvantages, there is the necessity to perform more than one procedure and
final thickness of the lesion and the donor area changes.
COLLABORATIONS
CGS
|
Conception and design study, data curation, methodology, project
administration, realization of operations and/or trials, writing -
original draft preparation, writing - review & editing.
|
AMR
|
Realization of operations and/or trials.
|
LAFK
|
Conception and design study, data curation, realization of operations
and/or trials.
|
CCF
|
Realization of operations and/or trials.
|
VBC
|
Realization of operations and/or trials.
|
ARB
|
Final manuscript approval, supervision, writing - review &
editing.
|
REFERENCES
1. Kneser U, Bach AD, Polykandriotis E, Koop J, Horch RE. Delayed
reverse sural flap for staged reconstruction of the foot and lower leg. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(7):1910-7. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000189204.71906.c2
2. Touam C, Rostoucher P, Bhatia A, Oberlin C. Comparative study of two
series of distally based fasciocutaneous flaps for coverage of the lower
one-fourth of the leg, the ankle, and the foot. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2001;107(2):383-92. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200102000-00013
3. Donski P, Fogdestam I. Distally based fasciocutaneous flap from the
sural region. A preliminary report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg.
1983;17(3):191-6. PMID: 6673085
4. Attinger A, Cooper P. Soft tissue reconstruction for calcaneal
fractures or osteomyelitis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32(1):135-70. PMID:
11465125
5. Carriquiry CE. Heel coverage with a deepithelialized distally based
fasciocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85(1):116-9. PMID: 2293720 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199001000-00022
6. Braga-Silva J, Martins PDE, Román JA, Gehlen D. Utilização do
Retalho Adipofascial Reverso nas Perdas de Substância Cutânea do Terço Distal da
Perna e Pé. Rev Soc Bras Cir Plást. 2005;20(3):182-6.
7. Moore KL, Dalley AF. Anatomia orientada para a clínica. 5a ed. Rio
de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2007.
8. Sobotta J, Waschke J. Sobotta Atlas de Anatomia Humana. 23a ed. Rio
de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2012.
9. Motoki THC, Carvalho KC, Vendramin FS. Perfil de pacientes vítimas
de trauma em membro inferior atendidos pela equipe de cirurgia reparadora do
Hospital Metropolitano de Urgência e Emergência. Rev Bras Cir Plást.
2013;28(2):276-81. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-51752013000200018
10. Rezende MR, Rabelo NTA, Benabou JE, Wei TH, Mattar Junior R,
Zumiotti AV, et al. Cobertura do terço distal da perna com retalhos de
perfurantes pediculados. Acta Ortop Bras. 2008;16(4):223-9. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522008000400007
11. Quirino AC, Viegas C. Retalhos fasciocutâneos para cobertura de
lesões no pé e tornozelo. Rev Bras Ortop. 2014;49(2):183-8. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2014.01.017
12. Souza Filho MVP, Santos CC. Microcirurgia em reconstruções
complexas: análise dos resultados e complicações. Rev Bras Cir Plást.
2009;24(2):123-30.
1. Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto,
São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
2. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, São
Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Camila Garcia Sommer, Avenida
Brigadeiro Faria Lima 5544, Vila São Manoel, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
Zip Code 15090-000. E-mail: camisommer@hotmail.com
Article received: November 12, 2018.
Article accepted: April 21, 2019.
Conflicts of interest: none.