INTRODUCTION
In the past two decades, the preservation of function as well as the final
esthetic result have become of primary importance in rhinoplasty. As a result,
there has been a greater tendency to use open techniques that provide greater
exposure of the anatomical elements, leading to new techniques and surgical
strategies.
The origin of the pioneering techniques for nasal tip projection in rhinoplasty
share a basic principle: sacrificing the integrity of the lateral cartilage to
increase the medial crus and gain nasal projection. In the medium and long term,
these techniques showed loss of the support mechanism of the nasal tip and
resulted in undesirable postoperative effects, including complications such as
clamping, asymmetry, and drooping of the nasal tip, in addition to creating an
unattractive and stigmatized nasal appearance1-3.
Various reports (Beekhuis & Colton4,5,
McCollough6,7, Petroff et al.8, Adams et al.9)
reported the difficulties in achieving satisfactory nasal projection using only
these methods. Projection may be difficult to achieve, especially in the black
nose, in which projection of the tip is a difficult task due to the thick skin
and hypotrophic skeleton. Thus, remodeling these nasal tips becomes a major
challenge, solved in large part with cartilaginous grafts in the dome and
columella.
This article presents another means for designing the nasal tip, using it as an
isolated complementary procedure to other techniques that alone do not reach
fully satisfactory results.
OBJECTIVE
To demonstrate a nasal tip projection technique using alar cartilage flaps,
performed alone or in combination with other procedures with the same
purpose.
METHOD
This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of the charts of patients
submitted to rhinoplasty between March 2015 and April 2017, in which the nasal
tip projection technique was applied using alveolar cartilage flaps at the
Department of Plastic Surgery of Daher Lago Sul Hospital, in Brasília, DF.
Patients had noses with bulbous tips and thick skin, and were difficult to
project using the usual techniques.
All patients provided signed informed consent authorizing use of records,
information on treatment, and photographs for scientific purposes.
All procedures were performed by the same plastic surgeon, the senior author of
this work.
The postoperative follow-up period was at least 1 year (ranging from 12 to 24
months).
The results were evaluated by a Full Member of the Brazilian Society of Plastic
Surgery who was not part of the surgical team, using comparative analysis of
preoperative and postoperative photographs (at least 6 months after
surgery).
The present study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Description of the surgical technique
The alar cartilage flap for projection of the nasal tip uses an innovative
approach that differs from the usual procedures for nasal tip projection
described in the literature.
The development of the new technique was based on a fortuitous event in which
there was difficulty in projecting the nasal tip, as well as other
successive cases.
The flap is made with the use of cranial bands of alar cartilage, after
release of the lateral portions, and the pedicled medial portion is
maintained. The width of the base compared to the length of the dorsum
determines the size of the flap and the projection to be created.
For better explanation of the technique, 5 steps are described:
Step 1 - Incision and detachment
Open rhinoplasty technique, with columella incision at its narrowest
point (Figures 1 and 2). Figures 1 and 2
illustrate the exposure of the alar cartilages.
Figure 1 - Horizontal columella incision.
Figure 1 - Horizontal columella incision.
Figure 2 - Detachment of the entire nasal dorsum and exposure of the
alar cartilage.
Figure 2 - Detachment of the entire nasal dorsum and exposure of the
alar cartilage.
Step 2 - Defatting of the nasal tip
The dissection of the skin leaves the adipose tissue in a deep plane
adherent to the superficial musculoaponeurotic system of the nasal tip
and perichondrium. Defatting of the cartilage is thorough to avoid
trauma (Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 3 - Defatting of the entire nose with maintenance of fat in
the deep plane.
Figure 3 - Defatting of the entire nose with maintenance of fat in
the deep plane.
Figure 4 - Defatting of the entire nose with maintenance of fat in
the deep plane.
Figure 4 - Defatting of the entire nose with maintenance of fat in
the deep plane.
Step 3 - Design of cranial portions of the alar cartilage
After suture fixation for the best definition of the dome, design of the
cranial portions of the alar cartilage was performed, prior to resection
to construct the flaps (Figures 5
and 6).
Figure 5 - Design of cranial portions of the alar cartilage to be
sectioned.
Figure 5 - Design of cranial portions of the alar cartilage to be
sectioned.
Figure 6 - Design of cranial portions of the alar cartilage to be
sectioned.
Figure 6 - Design of cranial portions of the alar cartilage to be
sectioned.
Step 4 - Release and resection of cranial portions of alar
cartilage
Incisions were performed on the flaps in the cranial portions of the alar
cartilage and pedicled at the dome, as shown in Figures 7 and 8.
Figure 7 - Release and resection of the cranial portions of the alar
cartilage.
Figure 7 - Release and resection of the cranial portions of the alar
cartilage.
Figure 8 - Release and resection of the cranial portions of the alar
cartilage.
Figure 8 - Release and resection of the cranial portions of the alar
cartilage.
Step 5 - Rotation of the cranial portion of the alar cartilage flap
and final construction of the new nasal tip projection
Points A and B are rotated toward point C, and cross each other to form
the main scaffold of the new nasal tip (Figures 9 and 10),
while maintaining the dome of the pedicled ala. Simple sutures with
nylon 6-0 were used for coaptation of the alar cartilage on the dome,
and construction of the new nasal tip was then completed, as shown in
Figures 9 and 10.
Figure 9 - Rotation of the cranial portions of the alar cartilage
flaps and final creation of the new structure for projection
of the nasal tip.
Figure 9 - Rotation of the cranial portions of the alar cartilage
flaps and final creation of the new structure for projection
of the nasal tip.
Figure 10 - Rotation of the cranial portions of the alar cartilage
flaps and final creation of the new structure for projection
of the nasal tip.
Figure 10 - Rotation of the cranial portions of the alar cartilage
flaps and final creation of the new structure for projection
of the nasal tip.
RESULTS
Twenty-two black patients with bulbous noses were submitted to rhinoplasty using
the wing cartilage flap technique for projection of the nasal tip; all were
primary rhinoplasties.
The mean age was 31.04 years and the follow-up ranged from 16 to 24 months.
The demographic data of the study patients and their characteristics are
presented in Table 1.
Table 1 - Demographic data.
Number of
Patients
|
22 |
Average age |
31.04 ± 1.22 |
Sex |
|
Female |
10 |
Male |
12 |
Ethnicity |
|
White |
2 |
Black |
20 |
Type of rhinoplasty |
|
Primary |
22 |
Secondary |
0 |
Results |
|
Excellent |
16 |
Good |
4 |
Fair |
2 |
Complications |
None |
Table 1 - Demographic data.
Figures 1 to 10 illustrate the surgical steps and the results of the original
alar cartilage flap technique for projection of the nasal tip.
Figures 11 to 16 show examples of patients with typical black noses, with
extended ala and bulbous nasal tip in the preoperative period and at one and two
years of postoperative follow-up. The postoperative results show noses with
narrower bases and tapered and raised nasal tips, and without a bulbous
appearance. In all illustrated cases, the alar cartilage flap technique for
projection of the nasal tip was used as an isolated technique or was combined
with other techniques.
Figure 11 - A, B and C: Preoperative aspect of a
male patient with typical black nose, bulbous tip, extended ala;
D, E and F: Postoperative aspect of
patient with less extended ala and narrower nasal tip, creating a
nose more harmonious with the face, with use of the alar cartilage
flap technique.
Figure 11 - A, B and C: Preoperative aspect of a
male patient with typical black nose, bulbous tip, extended ala;
D, E and F: Postoperative aspect of
patient with less extended ala and narrower nasal tip, creating a
nose more harmonious with the face, with use of the alar cartilage
flap technique.
Figure 12 -
A, B and C: Preoperative aspect of a
female patient with typical black nose, bulbous tip, extended ala;
D, E and F: Postoperative aspect with
less extended ala and narrower nasal tip, creating a nose more
harmonious with the face, with use of the alar cartilage flap
technique.
Figure 12 -
A, B and C: Preoperative aspect of a
female patient with typical black nose, bulbous tip, extended ala;
D, E and F: Postoperative aspect with
less extended ala and narrower nasal tip, creating a nose more
harmonious with the face, with use of the alar cartilage flap
technique.
Figure 13 - A, B and C: Preoperative aspect of a
female patient with typical black nose, bulbous tip, extended ala;
D, E and F: Postoperative aspect with
less extended ala and narrower nasal tip, creating a nose more
harmonious with a face, with use of the alar cartilage flap
technique.
Figure 13 - A, B and C: Preoperative aspect of a
female patient with typical black nose, bulbous tip, extended ala;
D, E and F: Postoperative aspect with
less extended ala and narrower nasal tip, creating a nose more
harmonious with a face, with use of the alar cartilage flap
technique.
Figure 14 - A: Female patient with black nose, tip sag, extended
ala; B: 1-year postoperative aspect presenting less
extended ala and raised nasal tip; C: 2-year
postoperative aspect with a nose more harmonious with the face, with
use of the alar cartilage flap technique.
Figure 14 - A: Female patient with black nose, tip sag, extended
ala; B: 1-year postoperative aspect presenting less
extended ala and raised nasal tip; C: 2-year
postoperative aspect with a nose more harmonious with the face, with
use of the alar cartilage flap technique.
Figure 15 -
A: Female patient in profile with black nose, drooping
tip, extended ala; B: 1-year postoperative aspect
presenting less enlarged ala and raised nasal tip; C:
2-year postoperative aspect with a nose more harmonious with the
face, with use of the alar cartilage flap technique.
Figure 15 -
A: Female patient in profile with black nose, drooping
tip, extended ala; B: 1-year postoperative aspect
presenting less enlarged ala and raised nasal tip; C:
2-year postoperative aspect with a nose more harmonious with the
face, with use of the alar cartilage flap technique.
Figure 16 -
A: Female patient with black nose, drooping tip,
extended ala; B: 1-year postoperative aspect presenting
less extended ala and raised nasal tip. The nose is more harmonious
with the face with use of the alar cartilage flap technique.
Figure 16 -
A: Female patient with black nose, drooping tip,
extended ala; B: 1-year postoperative aspect presenting
less extended ala and raised nasal tip. The nose is more harmonious
with the face with use of the alar cartilage flap technique.
DISCUSSION
The literature is still somewhat controversial regarding the results of
refinement of the nasal tip in rhinoplasty, with the main limitation being
excessive loss of nasal projection over time. Thus, the evaluation of projection
of the nasal tip is a critical point and a subject of discussion in rhinoplasty.
Different techniques and materials are used for better esthetic results and
maintenance of the nasal tip10,11.
The increased use of cartilage excision techniques in esthetic rhinoplasty has
often resulted in rupture of the nasal tip components, promoting inconsistent
and undesirable results in the medium and long term, with unsightly retraction
and compromised function11.
Beekhuis & Colton4,5 believed that the strength of the alar
cartilage and the septal angle are the factors that most affect the projection
of the tip. McCollough6,7 emphasized that the ligament structures of
the nasal tip are key components of the “tripod.” Petroff et al.8 recognized that the medial cartilage and
its relationship with the septum are important for sustaining the tip. Adams et
al.9 analyzed various support
components for projection of the nasal tip in rhinoplasty and realized that
greater loss in projection was observed in open approaches than with closed
rhinoplasty.
Conservative surgery with minimal or no resection is preferred, but repositioning
with precise sutures coupled with understanding of the dynamics when used alone
or in combination with cartilage grafts is acceptable4-9.
With loss of projection of the nasal tip, changes in rotation and length of the
nose can occur secondary to the loss of adequate support of the nasal cartilage.
Irregularities of the nasal tip, the dorsal contour, and alar retraction are
often caused by the loss of cartilage dynamics7,11.
The septal cartilage is considered a good graft donor area for the correction of
nasal deformities in non-primary rhinoplasty, for use in the preparation of
dorsal and projection grafts, struts, tip definition, and nasal length.
Auricular or costal cartilage may be alternative donors. However, even with the
availability of these resources, this new technique can be used as a single
point projection procedure or in combination with other procedures that alone
did not achieve complete projection as planned or desired11.
This original nasal tip projection technique using an alar cartilage flap has the
advantages of being a local flap, absence of observed complications, and good
maintenance of long-term shape and projection.
The simplicity of the technique still permits surgical flexibility and
creativity. While the flaps of the alar cartilage are being prepared, the
surgeon can rotate and fix them in the contralateral or ipsilateral cartilage.
The nasal tip is structured after the cartilaginous loops are formed with
separate sutures, according to individual requirements in each case.
This report presents a simple, easy-to-execute, and reliable technique that
produces a natural nasal appearance with maintenance of long-term tip
projection. It should be understood that this method is proposed as an
additional resource for projection of the tip when the desired result is not
obtained using the usual dome repositioning methods or cartilage grafts, as is
commonly observed in the black nose12,13.
CONCLUSION
This original alar cartilage flap technique for projection of the nasal tip has
been very effective. The employment of this technique has provided satisfactory
results for projection of the nasal tip.
The technique is simple to execute, without significant complications, and is a
viable option for nasal tip projection in selected patients, especially in
combination with other procedures. The technique is of great value in surgery on
the bulbous or black nose.
COLLABORATIONS
JCD
|
Analysis and/or interpretation of data; final approval of the
manuscript; conception and design of the study; completion of
surgeries and/or experiments; writing the manuscript or critical
review of its contents.
|
MCAG
|
Analysis and/or interpretation of data; completion of surgeries
and/or experiments; writing the manuscript or critical review of its
contents.
|
LGM
|
Analysis and/or interpretation of data; completion of surgeries
and/or experiments.
|
LMCD
|
Analysis and/or interpretation of data; completion of surgeries
and/or experiments.
|
IRJ
|
Analysis and/or interpretation of data.
|
GCS
|
Analysis and/or interpretation of data.
|
LDPB
|
Analysis and/or interpretation of data; completion of surgeries
and/or experiments.
|
CADCF
|
Analysis and/or interpretation of data; completion of surgeries
and/or experiments.
|
REFERENCES
1. Lee MR. Discussion: Anatomical Study of the Medial Crura and the
Effect on Nasal Tip Projection in Open Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2013;132(4):794-5. PMID: 24076671 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a01550
2. Han SK, Lee DG, Kim JB, Kim WK. An anatomic study of nasal tip
supporting structures. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52(2):134-9. PMID: 14745261 DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000095439.98488.e6
3. Janeke JB, Wright WK. Studies on the support of the nasal tip. Arch
Otolaryngol. 1971;93(5):458-64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1971.00770060704004
4. Beekhuis GJ, Colton JJ. Nasal tip support. Arch Otolaryngol Head
Neck Surg. 1986;112(7):726-8. PMID: 3707733 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1986.03780070038008
5. Colton JJ, Beekhuis GJ. Rhinoplasty analysis. Otolaryngol Clin North
Am. 1987;20(4):675-98.
6. McCollough EG, English JL. A new twist in nasal tip surgery. An
alternative to the Goldman tip for the wide or bulbous lobule. Arch Otolaryngol.
1985;111(8):524-9. PMID: 3896210 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1985.00800100072010
7. McCollough EG, Mangat D. Systematic approach to correction of the
nasal tip in rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol. 1981;107(1):12-6. PMID: 7469873 DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1981.00790370014002
8. Petroff MA, McCollough EG, Hom D, Anderson JR. Nasal tip projection.
Quantitative changes following rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
1991;117(7):783-8. PMID: 1863446 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1991.01870190095020
9. Adams WP Jr, Rohrich RJ, Hollier LH, Minoli J, Thornton LK, Gyimesi
I. Anatomic basis and clinical implications for nasal tip support in open versus
closed rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(1):255-61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199901000-00040
10. Joseph J. Nasoplastik und Sonstige Gesichts Plastik Nebst
Mammoplastik. Leipzig: Kurt Kabitzsch; 1931.
11. Daniel RK. The nasal tip: anatomy and aesthetics. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 1992;89(2):216-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199202000-00002
12. Rohrich RJ, Bolden K. Ethnic rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg.
2010;37(2):353-70. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2009.11.006
13. Momoh AO, Hatef DA, Griffin A, Brissett AE. Rhinoplasty: the african
american patient. Semin Plast Surg. 2009;23(3):223-31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1224802
1. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, São
Paulo, SP, Brazil.
2. Hospital Daher Lago Sul, Brasília, DF,
Brazil.
Corresponding author: José Carlos
Daher, SHIS QI7 Conjunto F - Lago Sul - Brasília, DF, Brazil. Zip
Code 71615-570. E-mail: daher@hospitaldaher.com.br
Article received: December 18, 2016.
Article accepted: May 17, 2018.
Conflicts of interest: none.