INTRODUCTION
The eyelid is a common site of cancer. Skin cancer of the eyelids, including
basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma, accounts for 5 to
10% of all skin cancers, with 95% comprising basal cell carcinomas or squamous
cell carcinoma1,2. Reconstruction of the lower eyelid after
excision for cancer or trauma is a challenge. Numerous options are possible
depending on the extent of the defect3.
Plastic surgery seeks to repair and restore the protective function of the
eyelid, preferably using techniques that also provide good aesthetic
results4. The surgical anatomy that
guides reconstruction planning divides the eyelid into 3 lamellae: anterior,
middle, and posterior. The anterior lamella is composed of the skin and
orbicularis oculi. The middle lamella is defined as the combined orbital septum,
adipose orbital tissue, and submuscular fibroadipose tissue. The posterior
lamella includes the fascia of the lower eyelid, the tarsus, and the connective
tunica of the eyelid5.
Eyelid defects are classified as 2 types, according to the affected structures:
partial, when the posterior lamella is preserved, and total, when all lamellae
are compromised6. In full-thickness
defects, it is necessary to restore the 2 lamellae and the eyelid support, a
function naturally performed by the tarsus, which is composed of dense
connective tissue, devoid of cartilage7.
In these cases, at least 1 of the reconstructed lamellae needs vascular
support.
Common and reliable surgical techniques involve patch and graft options. Thus, an
algorithm for reconstruction of full-thickness defects of the lower eyelid
assists in the choice of the type of reconstruction to be performed. Defects
smaller than 25% of the eyelid margin can be treated with primary suturing.
Cantholysis and canthotomy allow primary closure of defects comprising 25 to 50%
of the palpebral margin.
Tenzel’s semicircular flap combined with a periosteal flap or palatal mucosal
graft, with atrial or septal cartilage for the posterior lamella, is used to
repair defects of 50 to 75%. Lesions that require extensive resection of 50 to
100% of the palpebral margin are more satisfactorily treated with a
tarsoconjunctival flap of the upper eyelid for the internal lamella and a
forward flap or total skin graft for the anterior lamella8.
The literature reports discordant alternatives as to the best method of
reconstruction for the lower eyelid internal lamella when primary suturing is
impossible. The vast majority of studies comprise case reports or small patient
samples, leading to inconsistency in the evidence presented9.
This study evaluated cases of lower eyelid cancer that left a defect of more than
50% of the eyelid and were reconstructed with the combined use of 2 flaps for
the reconstitution of the anterior and posterior lamellae.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the results of the Hughes myotarsoconjunctival flap (Figure 1) for reconstruction of the internal
lamella combined with the VY Destro skin flap (Figure 2) for reconstruction of the external lamella in defects
caused by resection of lower eyelid cancer.
Figure 1 - Hughes flap. Hughes technique for reconstruction of the posterior
lamella of the lower eyelid. (Patel BCK, Flaharty PM, Anderson RL:
Reconstruction of the eyelids. Baker SR, Swanson NA. Local Flaps in
Facial Reconstruction, St. Louis, Mosby, 1995, p. 289. Fig. 15, A B
C and F.
Figure 1 - Hughes flap. Hughes technique for reconstruction of the posterior
lamella of the lower eyelid. (Patel BCK, Flaharty PM, Anderson RL:
Reconstruction of the eyelids. Baker SR, Swanson NA. Local Flaps in
Facial Reconstruction, St. Louis, Mosby, 1995, p. 289. Fig. 15, A B
C and F.
Figure 2 - Destro flap. Schematic representation of the Destro flap and its
subcutaneous tissue pedicle. Dr. Marco Willians Baena Destro, MSc
thesis entitled Retalhos Triangulares de Pele com Pedículo
Subcutâneo Central na Reconstrução de Pálpebra Inferior (Triangular
Skin Flaps with Central Subcutaneous Pedicle in Lower Eyelid
Reconstruction), 1990, p. 34, Fig. 8a and 8b, with
permission.
Figure 2 - Destro flap. Schematic representation of the Destro flap and its
subcutaneous tissue pedicle. Dr. Marco Willians Baena Destro, MSc
thesis entitled Retalhos Triangulares de Pele com Pedículo
Subcutâneo Central na Reconstrução de Pálpebra Inferior (Triangular
Skin Flaps with Central Subcutaneous Pedicle in Lower Eyelid
Reconstruction), 1990, p. 34, Fig. 8a and 8b, with
permission.
METHODS
This retrospective study of medical records included 13 patients who underwent
total reconstruction of the lower eyelid by the author after resection of cancer
between May 2012 and May 2016 at Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Passos, MG. When
the defect involved the total plane of the lower eyelid and horizontal extension
greater than 50%, the eyelid was reconstructed using the Hughes
myotarsoconjunctival flap10 to recreate
the posterior lamella; a triangular flap of skin with a subcutaneous Destro
pedicle was used to reconstruct the anterior lamella11.
Data collected included age, sex, histological tumor type, comorbidities,
surgical time, flap transection time, complications, and follow-up duration.
The results were evaluated using the following parameters: 1) palpebral occlusion
capacity; 2) signs of ectropion; 3) symmetry; and 4) morbidity of the flap donor
area.
All cases were performed by the author with the same assistant, and all were
performed under local anesthesia (lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:200,000) and
topical corneal anesthesia combined with intravenous sedation. One case was
performed with general intravenous anesthesia. Brush marking of tumor margins of
3 to 5 mm was performed. After antisepsis of the entire face and anesthesia, the
lesion was resected and sent immediately for frozen analysis and determination
of safety margins. After confirming margins free of cancer, surgery
proceeded.
For the Hughes flap, eyelid eversion was performed with a repair point at the
eyelid edge or with use of a retractor and forceps cable as a support. The
myotarsoconjunctival flap was designed so that the distal incision was 4 mm from
the palpebral margin (being parallel to the margin to ensure the stability and
contour of the upper eyelid) and the medial and lateral extension was sufficient
to reach and reconstruct the posterior lamella. On average, the height of the
dissected tarsus was 4 to 6 mm and was slightly smaller than the size of the
defect.
Infiltration of the everted subconjunctival upper eyelid was performed with 1 ml
of local anesthetic. An incision was made on the flap using a number 15 blade,
and the flap was dissected with blunt scissors in the subtarsal plane to the
plane of the levator muscle of the upper eyelid; this dissection was continued
superiorly until the flap could be advanced to the inferior defect without
tension. The flap was sutured with Vicryl® 6.0 in a continuous line
to the lower palpebral conjunctiva, just above the fundus of the palpebral sac
and extending to the palpebral ridge, thus, repairing the posterior lamella.
To repair the anterior lamella with the Destro flap, methylene blue was used to
demarcate a “V” flap that began at the lower ends of the defect with a vertical
line slightly longer than the height of the defect, descending and converging
toward the malar region. The central subcutaneous pedicle of the inverted
cone-shaped flap was delicately dissected by separating loose subcutaneous
tissue and preserving the vessels, in a dissection designed to taper the pedicle
that progressed to the muscular plane.
The larger the desired displacement, we ensured that the more tapered and longer
was the pedicle. We advanced the triangular flap on the myotarsoconjunctival
flap by sliding to cover the raw area. The first 2 points were attached with
Mononylon® 5.0, reaching the bilateral conjunctival ridge 2 mm
below the 2 upper angles of the flap, with some points attached with Vicryl 6.0.
The fasciocutaneous triangular flap was attached to the superior tarsus, which
was reflected 1 mm above the residual lower palpebral margin to avoid inferior
retraction (Figures 3 to 9).
Figure 3 - Basal cell carcinoma of the lower left eyelid.
Figure 3 - Basal cell carcinoma of the lower left eyelid.
Figure 4 - Resected tumor and Hughes flap demarcated on the everted upper
eyelid, with its border 4 mm distal from the palpebral
margin.
Figure 4 - Resected tumor and Hughes flap demarcated on the everted upper
eyelid, with its border 4 mm distal from the palpebral
margin.
Figure 5 - Flap folded and sutured to the lower palpebral conjunctiva to
repair the posterior lamella.
Figure 5 - Flap folded and sutured to the lower palpebral conjunctiva to
repair the posterior lamella.
Figure 6 - Dissected triangular Destro flap with central subcutaneous
pedicle in the shape of an inverted cone.
Figure 6 - Dissected triangular Destro flap with central subcutaneous
pedicle in the shape of an inverted cone.
Figure 7 - Destro flap advanced over the Hughes flap to reconstruct the
anterior lamella.
Figure 7 - Destro flap advanced over the Hughes flap to reconstruct the
anterior lamella.
Figure 8 - Six-month postoperative appearance.
Figure 8 - Six-month postoperative appearance.
Figure 9 - Normal palpebral occlusion.
Figure 9 - Normal palpebral occlusion.
Transection of the flap was performed after 3 to 4 weeks under local anesthesia
using a tentacan support for corneal protection (Figure 10). Hemostasis was performed at the upper border of the
flap, with thinning of excess tissue and healing by second intention. In some
cases, Vicryl 6.0 simple stitches were used to regularize the collar.
Figure 10 - Hughes flap transection.
Figure 10 - Hughes flap transection.
This study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki revised in
2000 and Resolution 196/96 of the National Health Council. The patients signed a
Free and Informed Consent Form, allowing the use of their data and the
publication of their photos (CAAE:69519617.7.0000.8043).
RESULTS
Thirteen patients (6 women and 7 men) were operated on over 4 years. All were
Caucasian. Ages ranged from 55 to 89 years with a mean of 72.61 years. Basal
cell carcinoma accounted for 11 cases (84.61%), with 1 case of squamous cell
carcinoma and 1 case of Merkel cell carcinoma. The surgical time averaged 75.76
minutes (for the first stage of reconstruction). Myotarsoconjunctival flap
transection was performed from 19 to 39 days after the first surgery, with a
mean of 28 days. The follow-up duration was at least 12 months. During this
period there were no cases of local recurrence (Table 1).
Table 1 - Patient characteristics.
Age (years) |
Sex |
Etiology |
Surgical time (min) |
Transection (days) |
Complications |
Resolution |
56 |
F |
BCC |
60 |
26 |
|
|
55 |
M |
BCC |
110 |
30 |
|
|
86 |
F |
BCC |
75 |
21 |
|
|
83 |
F |
BCC |
40 |
21 |
|
|
58 |
M |
BCC |
95 |
19 |
Ectopic mucosa on the palpebral border |
Upper eyelid skin graft |
80 |
F |
BCC |
75 |
39 |
|
|
59 |
M |
Merkel |
135 |
36 |
Edema with conjunctival irritation |
Massage |
77 |
M |
BCC |
130 |
39 |
|
|
89 |
F |
BCC |
45 |
28 |
|
|
83 |
M |
BCC |
40 |
22 |
|
|
61 |
F |
BCC |
60 |
23 |
|
|
85 |
M |
SCC |
75 |
32 |
|
|
72 |
M |
BCC |
120 |
28 |
Ectropion |
Fricke flap |
Table 1 - Patient characteristics.
According to the criteria established by the study, no patient had comorbidity at
the flap donor area. One patient with an extensive tumor developed early
conjunctival irritation due to edema that caused the skin of the flap to contact
and irritate the conjunctiva. With massage, she had spontaneous resolution at 4
months and regression of edema (Figures 11
to 13).
Figure 11 - Vegetative lesion of the lower right eyelid.
Figure 11 - Vegetative lesion of the lower right eyelid.
Figure 12 - Recent post-operative aspect of transection with edema and
conjunctival irritation.
Figure 12 - Recent post-operative aspect of transection with edema and
conjunctival irritation.
Figure 13 - Improvement of conjunctival irritation and flap edema after 4
months massage therapy.
Figure 13 - Improvement of conjunctival irritation and flap edema after 4
months massage therapy.
Another patient developed ciliary border hyperemia caused by ectopic conjunctival
mucosa beyond the eyelid border, despite having a regular eyelid border without
ectropion at the level of the limbus. This was corrected after 24 months with a
thin skin graft of the ipsilateral upper eyelid (Figures 14 to 17). The last
operated case had a severe ectropion, which was successfully corrected 3 months
later with a Fricke flap of the upper eyelid (Figures 18 to 21).
Contralateral symmetry and palpebral closure were observed in all cases at the
end of treatment, and no other functional problems were identified in any of the
patients.
Figure 14 - Defect after resection of basal cell carcinoma.
Figure 14 - Defect after resection of basal cell carcinoma.
Figure 15 - Eyelid margin hyperemia after transection due to exteriorized
positioning of the mucosa of the Hughes flap.
Figure 15 - Eyelid margin hyperemia after transection due to exteriorized
positioning of the mucosa of the Hughes flap.
Figure 16 - Upper eyelid skin graft on the eyelid margin.
Figure 16 - Upper eyelid skin graft on the eyelid margin.
Figure 17 - Improvement in eyelid margin aspect after grafting.
Figure 17 - Improvement in eyelid margin aspect after grafting.
Figure 18 - Tumor of the lower right eyelid.
Figure 18 - Tumor of the lower right eyelid.
Figure 19 - Extensive defect after resection.
Figure 19 - Extensive defect after resection.
Figure 20 - Ectropion and trapdoor scar 4 months after transection of the
flap.
Figure 20 - Ectropion and trapdoor scar 4 months after transection of the
flap.
Figure 21 - Resolution with Fricke flap.
Figure 21 - Resolution with Fricke flap.
DISCUSSION
Reconstruction of large defects of the lower eyelid is a challenge for
restorative surgery. Different techniques have been described, including those
by Mustardé12, the use of Hughes flap
with modifications and advances13, the
use of hard palate graft covered by orbicularis muscle advancement14, the use of the Tripier flap15, and other more complex approaches, such
as the use of pre-expanded lingual mucosal flap16, the use of acellular dermal matrix17, the use of cheek flap supported by the fascia lata18, and the use of the superior orbicularis
muscle flap combined with the island tarsoconjunctival19 and Fricke flap20,21. All these
techniques are useful when lower eyelid reconstruction is necessary; however,
some are complex and expensive3.
To achieve excellent functional and aesthetic results, the 2 layers of the lower
eyelid must be adequately reconstructed, bearing in mind that the use of a graft
on a lamella requires the use of a flap in the other. When a flap is used on a
lamella, an option is rebuilding of the other flap with a flap or graft. Once
this is done, the vascular supply is guaranteed, as is the integration of the
reconstruction13.
In the present study, we used the triangular flap of the subcutaneous pedicle to
reconstruct the anterior lamella. We believe that a flap of the same aesthetic
unit is the best option because it has color and thickness similar to that of
the resected area11,22. A skin graft, either from the upper
eyelid or retroauricular region, is also an option; however, the graft must be
removed from another surgical region and requires a flap to the internal lamella
to vascularize the graft.
The internal lamella can be reconstructed with the use of a nasal septal
chondromucosal graft12,22,23, ear cartilage (Destro’s preference)24,25, or hard palate mucosa14. However, these grafts are unstable in large resections due to
the lack of remaining eyelid support, which makes them difficult to attach, and
necessitates the use of extensive skin flaps to rework the external lamella26; however, these may impair adherence to
the graft due to excessive thickness.
To reconstruct the internal lamella, we used a myotarsoconjunctival flap. This
alternative provides more stability and support for lateral, medial, and
inferior attachment to the remaining lower eyelid, in addition to being well
vascularized.
Mustardé opposed the use of the upper eyelid for reconstruction of the lower
eyelid due to the possibility of upper palpebral retraction leading to corneal
exposure. This would be of concern if we consider the original work of Hughes in
1937, in which an incision was made in the gray line with total division of the
upper eyelid, leaving it with reduced support and susceptible to postoperative
retraction.
The main problem with the original technique was, therefore, frequent morbidity
in the donor area, with retraction and entropion after division of the pedicle.
To avoid this complication, some authors27-29 modified the
original Hughes technique to preserve the tarsus and reduce its inclusion in the
flap. In this modification, which we used in our patients, the lower horizontal
border of the Hughes flap should be at least 4 mm from the eyelid margin, so
that a tarsal plaque remains in the donor site of the upper eyelid, avoiding
postoperative deformity. There is no justification for not using this excellent
flap in lesions larger than 50% because is safe to use in terms of vascularity
and provides support for external lamellar apposition, which is a factor in
stability and reconstruction of the eyelid9.
One difficulty presented by this Hughes flap option occurs when the eye with the
affected eyelid is the single source of vision, making it difficult to use flaps
within the same aesthetic unit. Another negative point is the need for a second
operation 3 weeks later for transection of the Hughes flap and opening of the
eyelid cleft13.
Hughes performed transection of the myotarsoconjunctival flap pedicle after 3
months10. Cies and Bartlett30 reported dividing the patch at 3 and 4
weeks without complications, and McCord and Nunery28 waited 6 to 8 weeks before the split. Leibovitch et
al.31 divided the flap in 7 days and
found that this did not compromise the blood supply, with good aesthetic and
functional results even after early flap splitting. In our patients, the
objective was to perform transection after 3 weeks on average, but this period
varied due to external and individual factors, which in our analysis did not
alter the results; the mean transection was performed at 28 days.
One of our first patients (Figures 15 to 17) developed hyperemia of the palpebral
margin after division of the pedicle in the second surgical stage. We attributed
this hyperemia to use of simple Vicryl 6.0 suturing at the palpebral border
after transection; this led to advancement of the mucosa on the new palpebral
border and an excellent functional result; however, posterior aesthetic
correction was required, and was performed with a thin skin graft of the upper
eyelid 2 years later, achieving an excellent result.
Bartley and Putterman32 regularized the
border after transfection of the flap and allowed spontaneous granulation to
occur. This allowed the mucocutaneous junction to be formed by second intention
and to avoid postoperative hyperemia. Thus, this technique was performed in the
rest of the patients and hyperemia was not observed again.
More extensive lesions present more pronounced postoperative edema, which can
lead to eye discomfort and irritation. In these patients, postoperative massage
or lymphatic drainage can help with resolution (Figures 11 to 13)
We attributed a postoperative ectropion in the last patient (Figures 18 to 21) to
the sagging and poor elasticity of malar skin that we underestimated by using a
flap to reconstruct the anterior lamella. We believe that, in this case, Destro
fasciocutaneous flap was not a good choice for reconstruction of the anterior
lamella after rotating the Hugues flap.
Other alternatives, such as a Mustardé flap, or even skin grafting of the
contralateral or retroauricular upper eyelid on the myotarsoconjunctival flap,
should be considered if lateral facial flaccidity is present. In these cases,
full-thickness skin grafts are considered for reconstruction of the anterior
lamella33, and are preferred by many
authors34. In this well-known
complication with use of a Fricke flap, care should be taken to evaluate the
elasticity of facial skin before choosing a VY flap, since inadequate elasticity
of the skin of the malar region may lead to inferior retraction of the
reconstituted palpebral ridge.
The average surgical time was 74.61 minutes and was considered rapid for this
procedure. In 3 cases, the surgery was prolonged because the frozen margin
required extension; this did not affect the results, given the importance of
performing total excision of the tumor.
All patients were followed for at least 12 months by plastic surgery, with
satisfactory outcomes; 2 cases developed complications, but were treated. During
this period, there were no lesion recurrences and patients were followed up by
clinical oncology.
CONCLUSION
Lower palpebral reconstruction is a challenge for the plastic surgery specialist
who has several available techniques. The combined use of the Hughes
myotarsoconjunctival flap and a Destro flap is a valuable alternative to
complete reconstruction of the lower eyelid, as it achieves a favorable
functional and aesthetic result, enabling major reconstruction options after
cancer resection of the entire lower eyelid plane.
COLLABORATIONS
DAL
|
Writing the manuscript or critical review of its contents.
|
REFERENCES
1. Cook BE Jr, Bartley GB. Treatment options and future prospects for
the management of eyelid malignancies: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology.
2001;108(11):2088-98. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00796-5
2. Abraham JC, Jabaley ME, Hoopes JE. Basal cell carcinoma of the
medial canthal region. Am J Surg. 1973;126(4):492-5. PMID: 4582802 DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(73)80036-4
3. Panse N, Sambhus M, Sahasrabudhe P, Deodhar A. The Tarsoconjunctival
Flap for Lower Lid Reconstruction-Review of Literature and Case Series. J Clin
Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;4(2):271. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9570.1000271
4. Mélega JM, Viterbo F, Mendes FH. Cirurgia plástica: os princípios e
a atualidade. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2011. p. 573-4.
5. Kakizaki H, Malhotra R, Madge SN, Selva D. Lower eyelid anatomy: an
update. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63(3):344-51.
6. Newman MI, Spinelli HM. Reconstruction of the eyelids, correction of
ptosis, and canthoplasty. In: Thorne CH, ed. Grabb and Smith's Plastic Surgery.
7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. p.
397-416.
7. Alves JCRR, Liu RP, Silva Filho AF, Pereira NA, Carvalho EES.
Reconstrução palpebral com enxerto de cartilagem autóloga de concha de orelha.
Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2012;27(2):243- 8.
8. Fante RG. Reconstruction of the eyelids. In: Baker SR. Local Flaps
in Facial Reconstruction. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2007. p.
387-412.
9. Maniglia RF. Uso do retalho tarso conjuntival para reconstrução da
lamela interna da pálpebra inferior [Dissertação de mestrado]. São Paulo:
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo; 2008.
10. Hughes WL. A new method for rebuilding a lower lid: report of a
case. Arch Ophthalmol. 1937;17(6):1008-17.
11. Destro MW. Retalhos triangulares de pele com pedículo subcutâneo
central na reconstrução da pálpebra inferior [Tese de doutorado]. Belo
Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina;
1990.
12. Mustarde JC. Repair and reconstruction of the orbital region. 2nd
ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1980.
13. Rohrich RJ, Zbar RI. The evolution of the Hughes Tarsoconjunctival
flap for the lower eyelid reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg.
1999;104(2):518-22.
14. Lalonde DH, Osei-Tutu KB. Functional reconstruction of unilateral,
subtotal, full-thickness upper and lower eyelid defects with a single hard
palate graft covered with advancement orbicularis myocutaneous flaps. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(6):1696-700. PMID: 15861077
15. Tripier L. Lambeau músculocutané en forme de pont. Appliqué a la
restauration de paupieres. Gaz Hop (Paris). 1889;62:1124-5.
16. Miyawaki T, Hisako A, Suzuki H, Kurihara K, Jackson IT.
Pre-expansion of mucosa-lined flap for lower eyelid reconstruction. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(5):76e-82e.
17. Li TG, Shorr N, Goldberg RA. Comparison of the efficacy of hard
palate grafts with acellular human dermis grafts in lower eyelid surgery. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(3):873-8.
18. Matsumoto K, Nakanishi H, Urano Y, Kubo Y, Nagae H. Lower eyelid
reconstruction with a cheek flap supported by fascia lata. Plast Reconstr Surg.
1999;103(6):1650-4. PMID: 10323697
19. Porfiris E, Christopoulos A, Sandris P, Georgiou P, Ioannidis A,
Popa CV, et al. Upper eyelid orbicularis oculi flap with tarsoconjunctival
island for reconstruction of full-thickness lower lid defects. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 1999;103(1):186-91. PMID: 9915182
20. Fricke JCG. Bildung neuer Augenlieder (Blepharoplastik) nach
Zerstörungen und dadurch hervorgebrachten Auswärtswendungen derselben. Hamburg:
Pethes und Bessler; 1829.
21. Wilcsek G, Leatherbarrow B, Halliwell M, Francis I. The 'RITE' use
of the Fricke flap in periorbital reconstruction. Eye (Lond).
2005;19(8):854-60.
22. Destro MW, da Silva AL, Speranzini MB. Lower eyelid repair utilising
triangular skin flaps with subcutaneous pedicles. Br J Plast Surg.
1991;44(5):363-7. PMID: 1873616
23. Güzel MZ, Yildirim I, Aygit AC, Aydin Y, Bayramiçli M.
Reconstruction of the total lower eyelid defect - useful modifications. Eur J
Plast Surg. 1995;18(4):171-4.
24. Friedhofer H, Salles AG, Jucá MCCR, Ferreira MC. Eyelid
reconstruction using cartilage grafts from auricular scapha. Eur J Plast Surg.
1999;22(2-3):96-101.
25. Matsuo K, Sakaguchi Y, Kiyono M, Hataya Y, Hirose T. Lid margin
reconstruction with an orbicularis oculi musculocutaneous advancement flap and a
conchal cartilage graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(1):142-5.
26. Leone CR Jr. Tarsal pedicle flap for lower eyelid reconstruction.
Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(8):1423-4.
27. Pollock WJ, Colon GA, Ryan RF. Reconstruction of the lower eyelid by
a different lid- splitting operation: case report. Plast Reconstr Surg.
1972;50(2):184-7. PMID: 4558116
28. McCord CD Jr, Nunery WR. Reconstructive Procedures of the Lower
Eyelid and Outer Canthus. In: McCord CD Jr, ed. Oculoplastic Surgery. New York:
Raven Press; 1981. p.194-8.
29. Hughes WL. Total lower lid reconstruction: technical details. Trans
Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1976;74:321-9. PMID: 867633
30. Cies WA, Bartlett RE. Modification of the Mustardé and Hughes
methods of reconstructing the lower lid. Ann Ophthalmol.
1975;7(11):1497-502.
31. Leibovitch I, Selva D. Modified Hughes flap: division at 7 days.
Ophthalmology. 2004;111(12):2164-7. PMID: 15582069
32. Bartley GB, Putterman AM. A minor modification of the Hughes'
operation for lower eyelid reconstruction. Am J Ophthalmol.
1995;119(1):96-7.
33. Borges KS, Chedid R, Dibe M, Sbalchiero JC, Leal PRA. Reconstrução
de pálpebra inferior com retalho modificado de Hughes: análise de resultados e
complicações no Instituto Nacional do Câncer Rio de Janeiro. Rev Bras Cir Plást.
2010;25(3 Suppl.1):23.
34. Chedid R, Borges KS, Santos P, Sbalchiero JC, Dibe MA, Leal PR, et
al. Perfil das reconstruções de pálpebra inferior no Instituto Nacional do
Câncer: estudo retrospectivo de 137 casos. Rev Bras. Cirurgia Plást. 2010;25(3
Suppl.1):1-102.
1. Departamento de Cirurgia Plástica, Santa Casa
de Passos, Hospital Regional de Câncer de Passos, Passos, MG,
Brazil.
Corresponding author: Diogo Almeida
Lima, Avenida Arouca, 260, Centro - Passos, MG, Brazil. Zip Code
37900-152. E-mail: drdiogolima@gmail.com
Article received: August 8, 2017.
Article accepted: October 11, 2017.
Conflicts of interest: none.