INTRODUCTION
Ear neoplasms are relatively common as they are susceptible to sun exposure.
Surgery by excision and reconstruction of partial ear defects without changing
their natural shape or reducing their size is the best approach for treatment.
Alternative techniques involving healing by secondary intention or excisions
reduce the size or deform the ear as healthy tissues need to be removed. Skin
grafts in ear reconstruction are subject to contraction, loss of natural
contour, and aesthetic deformity1.
The retroauricular region has conventionally been used as the skin graft donor
site for surgery. However, in 1959, Owens2
introduced the concept of transposing a retroauricular skin flap through an
opening in the cartilage to another portion of the ear with a de-epidermized
pedicle. This technique minimizes the risks of cartilaginous exposure and
chondritis in healing by secondary intention, and has superior aesthetic
outcomes in terms of contour, color, shape of the external auricular meatus, and
subsequent hearing loss. We present two cases of partial ear reconstruction
after resection for skin cancer.
CASE REPORT
Two patients were treated at the Cancer Institute of the Hospital de Base de São
José do Rio Preto - São Paulo, in 2017 and 2018 after being diagnosed with basal
cell carcinoma by incisional biopsy. The lesions were slow growing, ulcerated,
and friable. They were excised under local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine solution
and 1:100,000 vasoconstrictors, with the surgical margins including cartilage
and posterior perichondrium.
Case 1
A 40-year-old male patient had a 1.5 cm nodular lesion in the right auricle
close to the auditory meatus. After resection of the lesion, a
retroauricular flap was made with an axial lower pedicle based on the lower
branch of the posterior auricular artery. After transposition through the
cartilaginous defect, the skin island was left in a shape and extension
similar to the resected skin defect, and an area of 1 x 1 cm2 corresponding to the arterial pedicle
was de-epidermized and primary closure of the donor area was performed
(Figures 1 and 2). The patient did not develop any post-surgical
necrosis, flap congestion, wound dehiscence, hematoma. or infection (Figure 3). The pathological report
revealed that it was an infiltrative and expansive basal cell carcinoma
without epidural or vascular invasion with tumor-free surgical margins.
Figure 1 - A: Auricular lesion - preoperative;
B: Defect after margin resection, including
conchal cartilage; C: Development of an
retroauricular island flap with inferior pedicle based on the
inferior branch of the posterior auricular artery;
D: Flap through the cartilaginous window to the
anterior face of the ear.
Figure 1 - A: Auricular lesion - preoperative;
B: Defect after margin resection, including
conchal cartilage; C: Development of an
retroauricular island flap with inferior pedicle based on the
inferior branch of the posterior auricular artery;
D: Flap through the cartilaginous window to the
anterior face of the ear.
Figure 2 - A: Flap positioned over the defect to demarcate
the area of the pedicle to be de-epidermized; B:
Immediate postoperative result.
Figure 2 - A: Flap positioned over the defect to demarcate
the area of the pedicle to be de-epidermized; B:
Immediate postoperative result.
Figure 3 - A: Appearance 2 months postoperatively;
B: Donor site with corresponding scar.
Figure 3 - A: Appearance 2 months postoperatively;
B: Donor site with corresponding scar.
Case 2
A 74-year-old male patient presented with a 2.5 cm lesion in the conchal and
left antihelix region. Resection of the lesion including cartilage and
perichondrium was performed, resulting in a defect of 3.5 x 3 cm size (Figure 4). A retroauricular flap was
made with an axial superior pedicle based on the superior auricular artery,
a branch of the superficial temporal artery. The flap was transposed through
the cartilaginous window, with a small portion of the pedicle de-epidermized
and the flap accommodated to the bed similar in shape and extension. Primary
closure of the donor area was performed (Figure 5). The results were satisfactory, without signs of
inflammation or other complications with good aesthetic results (Figure 6).
Figure 4 - A: Lesion in the preoperative left antihelix
region; B: Defect after margin resection, including
cartilage and perichondrium.
Figure 4 - A: Lesion in the preoperative left antihelix
region; B: Defect after margin resection, including
cartilage and perichondrium.
Figure 5 - A: Development of a superior pedicle
retroauricular island flap; B and C:
The flap was transposed across the cartilaginous window to the
anterior face of the ear; D and E:
Immediate postoperative period.
Figure 5 - A: Development of a superior pedicle
retroauricular island flap; B and C:
The flap was transposed across the cartilaginous window to the
anterior face of the ear; D and E:
Immediate postoperative period.
Figure 6 - Result 15 days postoperative with adequate color and
contouring and no complications.
Figure 6 - Result 15 days postoperative with adequate color and
contouring and no complications.
DISCUSSION
Several authors have described the use of the retroauricular flap and have
adapted the technique to add their own modifications. In 1972, Masson3 described the technique of reconstruction
of auricle based on a retroauricular flap, without a de-epidermized pedicle.
Renard4 performed a superior
de-epidermized pedicle retroauricular flap reconstruction for defects in the
auricle, and for more extensive ones involving the antihelix. Wood-Smith et al.5
reported the treatment of extensive lesions in the auricle using two
retroauricular flaps, one from the posterior surface of the ear and the other
from the superior pedicle. Yoav et al. 6, in turn, used a myocutaneous flap
based on the posterior auricular muscle.
Several studies have analyzed the surgical treatment of ear lesions. Some authors
advocate a skin graft as the first option, while others advocate
second-intention healing for small auricular lesions, and still others advocate
primary closure, depending on the location and size of the lesion7-9.
However, larger defects are associated with aesthetic and functional
complications. Adequate excision of tumors from this region requires resection
of cartilage for a safe tumor margin. A retroauricular flap has many advantages
as it is a single-stage surgical procedure that can be performed under local
anesthesia in an outpatient setting. When used for reconstruction of the auricle
and other defects of the anterior face of the ear, the results are similar in
terms of color and texture, with satisfactory aesthetic appearance6. It has low complications at the donor
site, with scar behind the ear and being in most cases of primary closure. This
flap has is safe due to its vascular supply, and is well documented in studies
by Park et al. 10, among others11.
Therefore, it is a safe option for reconstruction of ear defects of the entire
anterior surface and can be used even in large lesions.
CONCLUSION
The authors recommend that retroauricular flaps can be used in several ways,
including treatment of ear defects. It is well vascularized, which makes it safe
to harvest, it can be performed in a single stage, and it is useful for small
and large lesions without causing serious complications or sacrificing healthy
tissue. It has excellent aesthetic and functional results.
COLLABORATIONS
VBC
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, realization of operations and/or
trials.
|
MVC
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, realization of operations and/or
trials.
|
CCF
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, realization of operations
and/or trials.
|
GVS
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, realization of operations and/or
trials.
|
CGS
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, writing - review &
editing.
|
JGCK
|
Realization of operations and/or trials.
|
LAFK
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, realization of operations
and/or trials, writing - original draft preparation.
|
ARB
|
Analysis and/or data interpretation, final manuscript approval.
|
REFERENCES
1. Azaria R, Amir A, Hauben DJ. Anterior conchal reconstruction using a
posteroauricular pull-through transpositional flap. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2004;113(7):2071-5. PMID: 15253199 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000121186.46720.B0
2. Owens N. An effective method for closing the external auditory
canal. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1959;23(4):381-7. PMID:
13645254
3. Masson JK. A simple island flap for reconstruction of concha-helix
defects. Br J Plast Surg. 1972;25(4):399-403. PMID: 4567027 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(72)80083-3
4. Renard A. Postauricular flap based on a dermal pedicle for ear
reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;68(2):159-64. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198108000-00005
5. Wood-Smith D, Ascherman JA, Albom MJ. Reconstruction of acquired ear
defects with transauricular flaps. Plast Reconst Surg. 1995;95(1):173-5. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199501000-00031
6. Yoav PT, Horowitz Z, Bedrin L, Kronenberg J. Auricular
reconstruction with a postauricular myocutaneous island flap: Flip-Flop Flap.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(7):1191-9. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199612000-00010
7. Peled IJ. Healing of ear defects: primary or secondary. Plast
Reconst Surg. 1997;100(1):277-8.
8. Ghassemi A, Modabber A, Talebzadeh M, Nanhekhan L, Heinz M, Hölzle
F. Surgical management of auricular defect depending on the size, location, and
tissue involved. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71(8):e232-42.
9. Watson D, Hecht A. Repair of Auricular Defects. Facial Plast Surg
Clin North Am. 2017;25(3):393-408.
10. Park C, Shin KS, Kang HS, Lee YH, Lew JD. A new arterial flap from
the postauricular surface: its anatomic basis and clinical application. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 1988;82(3):498-505. PMID: 3406183
11. Song R, Song Y, Qi K, Jiang H, Pan F. The superior auricular artery
and retroauricular arterial island flaps. Plast Reconst Surg.
1996;98(4):657-67.
1. Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio
Preto, São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Lauro Arnoldo Ferreira
Koehler, Rua Curitiba, nº 202, Bairro Olarias, Ponta Grossa, Paraná,
Brazil. Zip Code: 84.035-030. E-mail: lauro_afk@hotmail.com
Article received: June 17, 2018.
Article accepted: February 10, 2019.
Conflicts of interest: none.