INTRODUCTION
For a long time, plastic surgeons and gynecologists have been working on vulvar reconstructions
related to episiotomies scars and functional muscle defects in urinary incontinence1, 2. The term female genital surgery encompasses several techniques aimed at improving
the female vulvar area, both aesthetically and functionally3.
The field of female vulvar and vaginal plastic surgery encompasses a set of very broad
surgical and non-surgical interventions, including labia minora reduction surgery
(called labiaplasty or nymphoplasty), genital rejuvenation procedures, surgery to
reduce or increase labia majora, mons pubis liposuction, hymenoplasty, interventions
on the G-spot and clitoris, and vulvar whitening procedures4, 5, 6, 7.
The demand for these surgeries has been growing more and more. According to the American
Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, there was a 14% increase in demand for these
surgeries from 2014 to 2015, corresponding to a growth of almost 220% in the last
5 years. Currently, it is practiced by more than 25% of plastic surgeons8.
The reverence for the body and its appearance is an important resource for obtaining
self-esteem and female well-being. In this way, it influences not only aspects related
to vanity but also those involved in health in all its aspects. In this context, female
genital plastic surgery has been one of the most sought after in the last five years,
especially by aesthetically dissatisfied women who seek a healthier and more pleasurable
sexual and social life2, 4.
Feelings of emotional distress are common in these women, significantly impacting
their self-esteem, sexuality, hygiene and vulvar functionality. Various physical complaints
involving the labia minora have been reported, including pain, infection, discomfort
during various physical activities (including sexual intercourse) and difficulties
with personal hygiene4, 9.
It was observed that the main reason for consulting women who want labiaplasty is
emotional dissatisfaction with the genital appearance and sexual relations, referring
to anxiety or inhibition10.
Thus, this research sought to quantify the interest of women assisted by the Centro
de Atenção à Mulher (CAM) in Rio do Sul-SC in these procedures, understanding the
reasons for dissatisfaction and showing how intimate aesthetics can interfere in the
lives of patients. Therefore, the objective is to evaluate the interest of women assisted
by the CAM of Rio do Sul in intimate aesthetic surgeries.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the interest of a group of women assisted by the CAM of Rio do Sul in
intimate aesthetic surgeries, evaluating aesthetic and functional causes that influence
interest.
METHODS
This research is characterized by an observational study of quantitative, qualitative,
field, and exploratory types. The research took place at the CAM in Rio do Sul-SC.
The population of the present study were women aged between 18 and 54 years old, attended
by the Gynecology services from February to March 2021. All patients who met the inclusion
criteria were invited to participate in the research. As a sample estimate, an average
of the consultations performed/day was used; thus, 150 patients were expected to be
interviewed. At the end of the collection period, 100 women were interviewed, according
to the sample calculation by Medronho11; in this research, the sample had a CI of 91.5%.
In a pre-gynecological consultation approach, the questionnaires were applied to sexually
active and inactive patients whom the CAM assists. Those who had previous surgeries
and/or intimate aesthetic procedures or had cognitive deficits that made it difficult
to apply the questionnaire were excluded (Figure 1).
Figure 1 - Flowchart of inclusion and exclusion of patients in the research.
Figure 1 - Flowchart of inclusion and exclusion of patients in the research.
As a research instrument, a semi-structured questionnaire prepared by the authors
was used, which is divided into four thematic blocks: Sample Characterization; Past
History; Evaluation of Intimate Appearance; this block uses the classification of
Degrees of Hyperplasia of Small Lips, according to Colaneri12; and Knowledge About Intimate Aesthetic Surgery. The project was approved by the
Research Ethics Committee (CEP), with opinion number 4,372,410.
Data were processed and grouped according to study variables. The database was organized
using a spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel and then transferred to the Statistical Package
for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 26.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, USA).
A descriptive analysis of the results was performed, representing the quantitative
variables by mean and standard deviation and the qualitative ones by absolute number
and percentage.
RESULTS
As seen in Table 1, regarding the characterization of the sample, the mean age was 37.56±12.96 years.
Of the 100 patients, the vast majority were married (54%), Catholic (61%) and had
completed high school (34%). Furthermore, it can be observed that 86% reported being
attracted to the opposite sex (heterosexuals), and, on average, the patients were
overweight (Body Mass Index - BMI - 26.65 kg/m2).
Table 1 - Sample Characteristics (n=100).
Sample Characteristics |
mean ±SD or n (%) n=100 |
Age years |
37.56±12.96 |
Marital status |
|
Single |
14 (14.0) |
Girlfriend |
26 (26.0) |
Married |
54 (54.0) |
Divorced |
3 (3.0) |
Widow |
3 (3.0) |
Religion |
|
Without religion |
7 (7.0) |
Catholic |
61 (61.0) |
Protestant |
15 (15.0) |
Spiritist |
7 (07.0) |
Others |
7 (07.0) |
Adventist |
3 (3.0) |
Education |
|
Incomplete elementary school |
17 (17.0) |
Complete primary education |
9 (09.0) |
Incomplete high school |
19 (19.0) |
Complete high school |
34 (34.0) |
Incomplete higher education |
9 (09.0) |
Complete higher education |
6 (06.0) |
Postgraduate studies |
6 (06.0) |
Master's degree |
0 (0.00) |
Doctorate degree |
0 (0.00) |
Post doctoral |
0 (0.00) |
Sexual orientation |
|
Heterosexual |
86 (86.0) |
Homosexual |
2 (02.0) |
Bisexual |
4 (04.0) |
No reply |
8 (08.0) |
BMI (Body Mass Index) = kg/m2 |
26.65±5.8 |
Table 1 - Sample Characteristics (n=100).
Regarding the patients’ relationship with their intimate aesthetics, it can be noted
that most patients considered intimate aesthetics very important (61%) and most were
satisfied (62%). At some point, a good portion of the patients felt embarrassed by
their intimate aesthetics (47% sometimes, 5% always), which was sometimes related
to the use of clothes such as bikinis, panties and leggings (36% sometimes, 13% always).
Most patients had no discomfort or pain with clothing (59%) and were satisfied with
the staining and lubrication of their genitals (75% and 48%, respectively). Regarding
interference in everyday life, 65% of the women indicated that they always had interference
and 20% sometimes. Interference with sexual and psychosocial life was not present
in most cases (68% and 52%, respectively), as shown in Table 2.
Table 2 - Relationship with intimate aesthetics (n=100).
Relationship with intimate aesthetics |
mean ± SD or n (%) n=100 |
Satisfaction with intimate aesthetics |
|
Very satisfied |
17 (17.0) |
Satisfied |
62 (62.0) |
Little satisfied |
16 (16.0) |
Indifferent |
5 (5.0) |
Importance |
|
Very important |
61 (61.0) |
Important |
35 (35.0) |
Little important |
2 (2.0) |
Irrelevant |
3 (03.3) |
Embarrassment due to intimate aesthetics |
|
Ever |
5 (05.0) |
Sometimes |
47 (47.0) |
Never |
40 (40.0) |
Indifferent |
7 (07.7) |
Discomfort or pain with clothes |
|
Ever |
10 (10.0) |
Sometimes |
30 (30.0) |
Never |
59 (59.0) |
Indifferent |
1 (01.0) |
Embarrassment with clothing (bikinis, underwear, and leggings) |
|
Ever |
13 (13.0) |
Sometimes |
36 (36.0) |
Never |
47 (47.0) |
Indifferent |
4 (04.0) |
Satisfaction with coloring |
|
Satisfied |
75 (75.0) |
Dissatisfied |
24 (24.0) |
They did not answer |
1 (01.0) |
Satisfaction with lubrication |
|
Very satisfied |
38 (38.0) |
Satisfied |
48 (48.0) |
Little satisfied |
8 (08.0) |
Indifferent |
5 (05.0) |
No reply |
1 (01.0) |
Psychosocial interference |
|
Ever |
10 (10.0) |
Sometimes |
26 (26.0) |
Never |
52 (52.0) |
Indifferent |
10 (10.0) |
No reply |
2 (02.0) |
Interference with sex life |
|
Ever |
9 (09.0) |
Sometimes |
15 (15.0) |
Never |
68 (68.0) |
Indifferent |
7 (07.0) |
No reply |
1 (01.0) |
Interference in everyday life |
|
Ever |
65 (65.0) |
Sometimes |
20 (20.0) |
Never |
6 (06.0) |
Indifferent |
8 (08.0) |
No reply |
1 (01.0) |
Table 2 - Relationship with intimate aesthetics (n=100).
In Table 3, it can be seen that, of the 100 patients, the vast majority had no knowledge about
intimate aesthetic surgeries, and, in addition, a significant portion (32%) were interested
in performing some intimate aesthetic surgery.
Table 3 - Intimate cosmetic surgery (n=100).
Sample characteristics |
mean ± SD or n (%) n=100 |
Knowledge |
|
Yes |
10 (10.0) |
No |
87 (87.0) |
No reply |
3 (3.0) |
Interest |
|
Yes |
32 (32.0) |
No |
63 (63.0) |
No reply |
5 (05.0) |
Table 3 - Intimate cosmetic surgery (n=100).
When analyzing Table 4, it is noted that most patients do not have any degree of hypertrophy of the labia
minora (Figure 1) but that a relevant number of patients (9%) have higher degrees (3 - labia minora
greater than 5 cm and 4 - labia minora larger than 6 cm).
Table 4 - Labia minora hyperplasia (n=100).
Degree of hyperplasia of the labia minora |
mean ± SD or n (%) n=100 |
Degrees of hyperplasia (Colaneri)12 |
|
Grade 0 (> 1cm) |
49 (49.0) |
Grade 1 (> 1 > 3cm) |
24 (24.0) |
Grade 2 (> 3 < 5 cm) |
14 (14.0) |
Grade 3 (> 5cm) |
7 (07.0) |
Grade 4 (> 6cm) |
2 (02.0) |
No reply |
4 (04.0) |
Table 4 - Labia minora hyperplasia (n=100).
DISCUSSION
The findings obtained from the research indicated that there was a general interest
in performing intimate aesthetic surgeries. Of the 100 women interviewed, 32 were
interested in having some type of intimate aesthetic surgery.
The results, which indicated an interest in approximately 32% of the women interviewed,
corroborate the findings of Lima13, in which 35% showed interest in performing intimate aesthetic procedures and 20%
were interested in surgical procedures for intimate beautification. In the studies
by Kalaaji et al.14 there was general interest in performing intimate aesthetic surgeries, as evidenced
in this study (22.6%). On the other hand, when looking for more recent studies, there
are no data regarding the interest in these procedures. However, Placik & Devgan8 show an exponential increase in the internet search for pubic mound liposuction and
labiaplasty procedures between 2018 and 2019.
Currently, more and more intimate aesthetics are gaining ground, as women feel more
empowered and encouraged to talk about their sexuality. In addition, the media and
globalization brought the idealization of the perfect body10. Women desire intimate cosmetic procedures, mostly labiaplasty, for aesthetic reasons
– for example, to reduce self-consciousness in public situations and feelings of ugliness
and abnormality.
Functional reasons are, for example, to reduce discomfort, irritation or pain during
activities (nonsexual, for example, irritation in clothing or sports activities).
Sexual reasons are to lessen dyspareunia or fear of negative evaluation by a sexual
partner or self-consciousness during intimacy. Sometimes they had a bad experience
with negative comments or were teased about their genital appearance.
The factors influencing the decision to undergo labiaplasty are the media, relationships
and psychological well-being15. Sharp et al. characterized women’s motivations as “appearance”, “functional”, “sexual”
and “psychological” motivations, as commonly reported8, 15, 16. Furthermore, Pardo et al.17 reported that among the indications for labiaplasty, there were aesthetic causes
in 95.4%, functional in 37.2% and psychological causes in 17.4%.
When analyzing the interest in the procedure according to age group, it is observed
that 28% of the patients were under 30 years old, 34% were between 35-40 years old,
and 37.5% were over 40 years old. Compared with the literature, these data agree with
the study by Müllerová & Weiss, which shows that the prevalence of these procedures
is higher in patients aged 25-35 years, with the second wave of demand between 40-50
years16. It is believed that these procedures’ greatest interest and prevalence are in this
age group due to the effects of puberty and menopause.
In addition to the high interest in the procedures, dissatisfaction with intimate
aesthetics was an alarming point of the study. Of the patients studied, 16% were dissatisfied
with their intimate aesthetics, which is in line with several studies carried out
in Brazil, such as Lima13, which showed 15.3% of dissatisfaction, a statistic that is repeated in international
studies such as Sharp et al.9, who reported that approximately 17% of women were dissatisfied.
Of the dissatisfied patients, 68.75% were interested in performing some intimate aesthetic
procedure. Likewise, in the group formed by patients who responded that they felt
embarrassed (always and sometimes), 48.97% were interested in performing some intimate
intervention. These data show that aesthetic and psychological aspects are the main
motivators for procedures1, 8, 16, 18, 19.
When resorting to physical/structural characteristics, observing the questionnaire
of degrees of hypertrophy of labia minora (HPL), the patients who presented more severe
degrees of hypertrophy, grades 3 and 4 in the Colaneri’s Classification12 were, on average, more interested in performing surgery of intimate aesthetics (100%).
Compared with the literature, no data associating the prevalence of procedures with
HPL degrees exists. This fact shows that, in addition to the mental component of how
women relate to their intimate aesthetics, the physical component is directly linked
to the greater demand for such types of surgeries. Also, this study observed that
patients with HPL grades 3 and 4 suffer more from embarrassment and discomfort. Therefore,
these assessments must be carried out and systematized in health systems.
When observing the women’s knowledge about the types of intimate aesthetic surgery,
the vast majority (87%) of the patients did not know about any intimate aesthetic
surgery. When evaluating the women who responded knowing the procedures, 50% were
interested in performing an intimate aesthetic procedure. This corroborates the hypothesis
that perhaps the interest in performing these procedures is not greater due to a lack
of knowledge about this type of surgery.
Finally, according to data from the Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica Estética, in 2017, Brazil performed approximately 21,000 labiaplasties per year, ranking first
in the world a number lower than the interest shown by the study population. In addition,
studies such as those by Sharp et al.15 and Veale et al.19 report that most patients undergo surgeries through private systems.
CONCLUSIONS
The results obtained indicated considerable interest in performing intimate aesthetic
procedures. Such interest may be related to the growing female empowerment, which
opens space for greater sexual expression and, thus, greater freedom to search for
intimate beautification procedures. Furthermore, it may be closely linked to the growing
search for the ideal body proposed by the media.
Due to the importance given to intimate aesthetics in the physical, psychosocial,
sexual and daily interference, in addition to the discomfort and embarrassment that
lead patients to seek specialized medical care, with an important impact on the quality
of life of these people8, 15, 16, adequate resources must be allocated to greater provision of such procedures in
the Unified Health System for the population of Brazil.
REFERENCES
1. Goodman M P, Placik OJ, Benson RH 3rd, Miklos JR, Moore RD, Jason RA, et al. A large
multicenter outcome study of female genital plastic surgery. J Sex Med. 2010;7(4 Pt
1):1565-77. PMID: 19912495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01573.x
2. Goodman M, Fashler S, Miklos J, Moore R, Brotto L. The sexual, psychological, and
body image health of women undergoing elective vulvovaginal plastic/cosmetic procedures:
A pilot study. Am J Cosmet Surg. 2011;28(4):219-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074880681102800404
3. Clerico C, Lari A, Mojallal A, Boucher F. Anatomy and Aesthetics of the Labia Minora:
The Ideal Vulva? Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41(3):714-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0831-1
4. Crouch NS, Deans R, Michala L, Liao LM, Creighton SM. Clinical characteristics of
well women seeking labial reduction surgery: a prospective study. BJOG. 2011;118(12):1507-10.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03088.x
5. Cihantimur B, Herold C. Genital beautification: a concept that offers more than reduction
of the labia minora. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37(6):1128-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-013-0211-4
6. Vieira-Baptista P, Lima-Silva J, Beires J. “Cirurgia íntima”: o que se faz e com que
bases científicas? Acta Obstet Ginecol Port. 2015;9(5):393-9.
7. Fasola E, Gazzola R. Labia Majora Augmentation with Hyaluronic Acid Filler: Technique
and Results. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(10):1155-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw083
8. Placik OJ, Devgan LL. Female Genital and Vaginal Plastic Surgery: An Overview. Plast
Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(2):284e-97e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005883
9. Sharp G, Tiggemann M, Mattiske J. A Retrospective Study of the Psychological Outcomes
of Labiaplasty. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(3):324-31.
10. Özer M, Mortimore I, Jansma E P, Mullender MG. Labiaplasty: motivation, techniques,
and ethics. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15(3):175-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2018.1
11. Medronho RA. Epidemiologia. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2009.
12. Colaneri AGF. Nova classificação para hipertrofia dos pequenos lábios vaginais e correlação
com as técnicas cirúrgicas indicadas. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2018;33(1):64-73.
13. Lima RA. Satisfação das mulheres com sua estética íntima [Trabalho de Conclusão de
Curso]. Campina Grande: Universidade Estadual da Paraíba; 2017. 31 p.
14. Kalaaji A, Dreyer S, Maric I, Schnegg J, Jönsson V. Female Cosmetic Genital Surgery:
Patient Characteristics, Motivation, and Satisfaction. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(12):1455-66.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy309
15. Sharp G, Tiggemann M, Mattiske J. Factors That Influence the Decision to Undergo Labiaplasty:
Media, Relationships, and Psychological Well-Being. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(4):469-78.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv270
16. Müllerová J, Weiss P. Plastic surgery in gynaecology: Factors affecting women’s decision
to undergo labiaplasty. Mind the risk of body dysmorphic disorder: A review. Women
Aging. 2020;32(3):241-58.
17. Pardo SJ, Sola D V, Galan CG, Contreras ML. Labioplastía genital, experiencia y resultados
en 500 casos consecutivos. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 2015;80(5):394-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-75262015000500007
18. Veale D, Eshkevari E, Ellison N, Costa A, Robinson D, Kavouni A, et al. Psychological
characteristics and motivation of women seeking labiaplasty. Psychol Med. 2014;44(3):555-66.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713001025
19. Veale D, Eshkevari E, Ellison N, Costa A, Robinson D, Kavouni A, et al. A comparison
of risk factors for women seeking labiaplasty compared to those not seeking labiaplasty.
Body Image. 2014;11(1):57-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.10.003
1. Centro Universitário para o Desenvolvimento do Alto Vale do Itajaí, Rio do Sul,
SC, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Luiz Eduardo Mendes Zanis Rua Brasil, 673, Rio do Sul, SC, Brazil Zip Code: 89165-634 E-mail: luiz.zanis@unidavi.edu.br
Article received: June 07, 2021.
Article accepted: April 07, 2022.
Conflicts of interest: none.
Institution: Centro de Atenção à Mulher de Rio do Sul, Rio do Sul, SC, Brazil.