INTRODUCTION
Head and neck cancers, closely related to alcoholism and smoking, have a significant
prevalence in the Brazilian population. There was an increase in this type of cancer
from 5.82 per 100 thousand inhabitants in 2000 to 11.54 in 2008, with squamous cell
carcinoma being the most common histological type1. Only in 2008, 21,875 new cases were diagnosed1. A more recent study found 220,390 cases diagnosed between 2000 and 20142. Transposition of free flaps is one of the techniques of choice in head and neck
cancer reconstruction3. The great vascularization of this region would generally allow microvascular anastomoses
with cervical receptor vessels. However, many of these patients undergo adjuvant radiotherapy.
Radiotherapy significantly changes the region’s vascular permeability, making it challenging
to use recipient vessels (mainly veins) for the microsurgical flap3.
The grafting of veins from other parts of the body, such as the saphenous vein, is
the standard choice in this situation reported above4. However, this option requires two anastomoses in the grafted vein; one in the recipient’s
vessel and another in the vein of the flap itself. Thus, increasing the risk of thrombosis
and the surgical time and increasing the failure rate of reconstruction4.
An alternative to vein grafting is the cephalic vein transposition5 because the cephalic vein is located far from the region undergoing radiotherapy.
Furthermore, it has a relatively constant course and caliber, in addition to a slightly
variable number of tributaries. The cephalic vein is extremely useful in head and
neck reconstruction4,5. This venous transposition requires only a cervical anastomosis in the flap with
a lower risk of thrombosis and less execution time.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the cephalic vein anatomical characteristics in cadavers for cervical
transposition and its use in microsurgical flaps.
METHODS
Cadavers
The present study is primary. Six cephalic veins from three cadavers were dissected:
a 71-year-old woman and two men, 50 and 62 years old, at the death verification service
of the Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (SVO-FMUSP), from October to December 2019. The Universidade Federal de São Paulo Research Ethics Committee (CEP analyzed and approved this study under number 0675/2019,
after its registration at Plataforma Brasil.
Surgical technique
First, the deltopectoral groove was identified to delimit the incision; the cut was
made between 1 and 2 cm lateral to the groove to avoid direct injury to the cephalic
vein. The distal incision progressed to the humeral mid-level, on the arm’s lateral
surface (usual topography of the cephalic vein). When identified the vein, its tributaries
and the distal vein were connected, besides rotating the axilla from distal to proximal
(Figures 1 and 2). The vein was transposed up to the neck over the clavicle, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 1 - Dissection of the left cephalic vein, incision made near the deltopectoral sulcus,
and the tributaries’ ligature. The neck was dissected for anatomical purposes only.
Figure 1 - Dissection of the left cephalic vein, incision made near the deltopectoral sulcus,
and the tributaries’ ligature. The neck was dissected for anatomical purposes only.
Figure 2 - Dissection of the right cephalic vein, incision made close to the deltopectoral sulcus,
and ligature of the tributaries. The neck was dissected for anatomical purposes only.
Figure 2 - Dissection of the right cephalic vein, incision made close to the deltopectoral sulcus,
and ligature of the tributaries. The neck was dissected for anatomical purposes only.
Figure 3 - Transposition of the cephalic vein to the cervical region. A. Note that there is the
possibility of extending the left cephalic vein to the contralateral cervical region,
showing the versatility of the cephalic vein; B. Demonstration of both cephalic veins
dissected and transposed to the cervical region.
Figure 3 - Transposition of the cephalic vein to the cervical region. A. Note that there is the
possibility of extending the left cephalic vein to the contralateral cervical region,
showing the versatility of the cephalic vein; B. Demonstration of both cephalic veins
dissected and transposed to the cervical region.
RESULTS
The veins had an average length of 18.75 ± 1.84cm and the number of tributaries with
a variation of 7-9. The diameter coincided in both veins of each cadaver, as shown
in Table 1. The anatomical parameter used to identify them (deltopectoral groove) proved reliable,
allowing predictable dissection.
Table 1 - Patients weight and volume transfused.
Cephalic Vein |
Side |
Gender |
Age |
Height\Weight (m\Kg) |
No. of Tributaries |
Length (cm) |
Diameter (mm) |
1 |
D |
Male |
50 |
1,60\71 |
8 |
19 |
4 |
2 |
E |
Male |
50 |
1,60\71 |
7 |
19,5 |
4 |
3 |
D |
Male |
62 |
1,63\62 |
9 |
20,3 |
3 |
4 |
E |
Male |
62 |
1,63\62 |
8 |
18,9 |
3 |
5 |
D |
Female |
71 |
1,52\55 |
7 |
17,8 |
3 |
6 |
E |
Female |
71 |
1,52\55 |
8 |
17 |
3 |
Table 1 - Patients weight and volume transfused.
DISCUSSION
Head and neck oncological reconstruction went through different stages. In the 40s,
there were several attempts to correct these defects with local flaps and skin grafts,
which did not show good long-term results, evolving with orofacial fistulas, dehiscences,
necroses, and complex deformities resulting from reconstruction6. Other options have emerged over time, such as the temporofrontal pedicled flap7 and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap8. However, the difficulty of axial rotation and the fact that there is little available
tissue adjacent to the lesion caused free flaps to emerge as one of the main options
for reconstruction in these cases9. They are more advantageous than pedicled axial flaps, as they allow better blood
supply, less tension, greater malleability, moldability and tissue extension for reconstruction1,2.
In patients who have not undergone previous radiotherapy or surgical treatment, it
is possible to use the neck and face’s recipient vessels, such as branches of the
external carotid artery and tributaries of the internal jugular vein or the external
jugular vein10. The transposition of veins in the thoracic region has been a viable option to circumvent
vascularization impairment in patients undergoing cervicofacial radiotherapy10,11.
In this described technique, the transposed cephalic vein will be anastomosed to the
flap vein, making a single anastomosis, reducing the risk of thrombosis, and decreasing
the reconstruction’s failure rate. There are several possible options for vessels
to be transposed. In addition to the cephalic vein, we have the thoracodorsal vein
and the transverse cervical vein11. Among these options, the cephalic vein is one of the main alternatives, as it has
an adequate diameter, predictable dissection and is located farther from the usual
radiotherapy site for head and neck cancer12,13.
Our work corroborated data from the literature, showing the constant profile of the
vein concerning the caliber and length, in addition to the little variable number
of tributaries. It allows excellent venous drainage and is generally free from radiotherapy
ablation due to its lateral thoracic location.
The literature has several reports on the successful use of the cephalic vein11,13,14, which confirms this technique as a reliable option in head and neck reconstruction.
CONCLUSION
The transposition of the cephalic vein is an interesting option for head and neck
cancer reconstruction, as it has constant characteristics and a predictable location
and maybe a suitable technique to the therapeutic arsenal of the reconstructive plastic
surgeon.
REFERENCES
1. Casati MFM, Vasconcelos JA, Vergnhanini GS, Contreiro PF, Graça BT, Kanda JL, et al.
Head and neck cancer epidemiology in Brazil: populational based cross-sectional study.
Rev Bras Cir Cabeça Pescoço. 2012 Out/Dez;41(4):186-91.
2. Carvalho LGA, Santiago CPL, Andrade ACM, Valença AMG, Riveiro ILA, Castro RD. El câncer
de cabeza y cuello en Brasil: un análisis de 15 años. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2018 Out;55(3):22-8.
3. Hanasono MM, Barnea Y, Skoracki RJ. Microvascular surgery in the previously operated
and irradiated neck. Microsurgery. 2009;29:1-7.
4. Maricevich M, Lin LO, Liu J, Chang EI, Hanasono MM. Interposition vein grafting in
head and neck free flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Out;142(4):1025-34.
5. Chan D, Rabbani CC, Inman JC, Ducic Y. Cephalic vein transposition in the vessel-depleted
neck. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;155(2):367-8.
6. McGregor IA. The pursuit of function and cosmesis in managing oral cancer. Br J Plast
Surg. 1993 Jan;46(1):22-31.
7. McGregor IA. The temporal flap in intra-oral cancer: its use in repairing the post-excisional
defect. Br J Plast Surg. 1963 Out;16:318-35.
8. Ariyan S. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. A versatile flap for reconstruction
in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979 Jan;63(1):73- 81.
9. Vanni CMRS, Pinto FR, Castro R, Kanda JL. Pedicle temporofrontal flap for head and
neck reconstruction. Arq Bras Ciên Saúde. 2010 Mai/Ago;35(2):99-102.
10. Rinaldo A, Shaha AR, Wei WI, Silver CE, Ferlito A. Microvascular free flaps: a major
advance in head and neck reconstruction. Acta Otolaryngol. 2002;122(7):779-84.
11. Vasilakis V, Patel HDL, Chen HC. Head and neck reconstruction using cephalic vein
transposition in the vessel-depleted neck. Microsurgery. 2009 Jun;29(8):598-602.
12. Kubo T, Yano K, Hosokawa K. Management of flaps with compromised venous outflow in
head and neck microsurgical reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2002;22(8):391-5.
13. Chan D, Rabbani CC, Inman JC, Ducic Y. Cephalic vein transposition in the vessel-depleted
neck. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;155(2):367-8.
14. Inoue T, Fujino T. An upper arm flap, pedicled on the cephalic vein with arterial
anastomosis, for head and neck reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1986 Oct;39(4):451-3.
1. Federal University of the São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Corresponding author: Roney Gonçalves Fechine Feitosa, Rua Borges Lagoa 1083, Sala 62, Vila Clementino, SP, Brazil. Zip Code: 04038-032.
E-mail: roneyfechine@gmail.com
Article received: April 27, 2020.
Article accepted: July 19, 2020.
Conflicts of interest: none