ISSN Online: 2177-1235 | ISSN Print: 1983-5175

Before publication, all papers submitted to the RBCP undergo a review and arbitration process to ensure high quality standards and absence of bias in article selection. Each article is evaluated by the Editorial Office to ensure completeness and adherence to journal guidelines. All papers are peer reviewed by at least two reviewers. Acceptance is based on originality, significance, and scientific contribution. The reviewers fill out a form, where assessments of all the sections of an article will be recorded. Thereafter, they make general comments about the study and recommendations for publication or revision. The editor makes the final decision on publishing the study. A third reviewer is consulted in cases of disagreement between the reviewers. The revisions suggested by the reviewers are sent to the corresponding author, and the revised manuscript is sent back to the reviewers to determine whether the suggestions/requirements were met. The editor decides on whether the revised manuscript will be assessed by the same reviewers. In exceptional cases, depending on the subject matter of the manuscript, the editor may request for ad hoc reviewers—researchers who are not part of the Editorial Board—to evaluate the study. This process is carried out through an electronic system and a double-blind review system is adopted to ensure anonymity. The dates of receipt and approval for publication are indicated in the article with respect the chronological order of publication. Reviewers should follow the COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers (



Licença Creative Commons All scientific articles published at are licensed under a Creative Commons license